Electronic government return assessment by measuring information system usage

Electronic Government

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-21

  Almutairi, Helaiel ^a  

^a KUWAIT UNIVERSITY   (Kuwait)

Author keywords

E government; Evaluation; Information system usage; Kuwait; Public sector

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957657345     PISSN: 17407494     EISSN: 17407508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/EG.2010.029888     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Al-Gahtani, S.S. (2001) 'The applicability of the TAM model outside North America: an empirical test in the Arab world', Proceedings of the BIT World Conference, 4-6 June 2001, Cairo.
2. Bannister, F. (2007) 'The curse of the benchmark: an assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons', International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 74, pp.71-188.
3. Barnes, S. and Vidgen, R. (2006) 'Data triangulation and web quality metrics: a case study in e-government', Information & Management, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp.767-777.
4. Brnjofsson, E. and Yang, S. (1996) 'Information technology and productivity: a review of the literature', Advances in Computers, Vol. 43, pp.179-214.
5. Bruin, H. (2002) 'Performance measurement in the public sector: strategies to cope with the risks of performance measurement', The International Journal of Pubic Sector Management, Vol. 15, No. 7, pp.578-594.
6. Capgemini (2006) Online Availability of Public Services: How is Europe Progressing?, European Commission DG Information Society, Bruxells.
7. Carbo, T. and Williams, J. (2004) 'Models and metrics for evaluating local electronic government systems and services', Electronic Journal of e-Government, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp.95-104.
8. Chircu, A. (2008) 'E-government evaluation: towered a multidimensional framework', Electronic Government, An International Journal, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp.345-363.
9. Davison, R.M., Wagner, C. and Ma, L.C.K. (2005) 'From government to e-government: a transition model', Information Technology & People, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp.280-299.
10. Gupta, M.P. and Jana, D. (2003) 'E-government evaluation: a framework and case study', Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp.365-387.
11. Halaris, C., Magoutas, B., Papadomichelaki, X. and Mentzas, G. (2007) 'Classification and synthesis of quality approaches in e-government services', Internet Research, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp.378-401.
12. Heeks, R. (2006) 'Benchmarking e-government: improving the national and international measurement, evaluation and comparison of e-government', Igovernment Working Paper Series. Available online at: www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/ idpm/publications/wp/igov/index.htm (accessed on 14 September 2008).
13. Henriksson, A., Yiori, Y., Forst, B. and Middleton, M. (2007) 'Evaluating instrument for e-government websites', Electronic Government, An International Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp.204-226.
14. Holliday, I. and Yep, R. (2005) 'E-government in China', Public Administration and Development, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp.239-249.
15. Igbaria, M., Pavri, F.N. and Huff, S.L. (1989) 'Microcomputer application: an empirical look at usage', Information and Management, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp.187-196.
16. Iyer, L., Singh, R., Salam, A.L. and D A'ubeterre, F. (2006) 'Knowledge management to government-to-government process coordination', Electronic Government, An International Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.18-35.
17. Janssen, D., Rotthier, S. and Snijkers, K. (2004) 'If you measure it they will score: an assessment of international e-governrment benchmarking', Information Policy, Vol. 9, pp.121-130.
18. Kolsaker, A. and Lee-Kelley, L. (2006) 'Citizen-centric e-government: a critique of the UK model', Electronic Government, An International Journal, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp.127-138.
19. Kunstelj, M.and Vintar, M. (2004) 'Evaluating the progress of e-government development: a critical analysis', Information Polity, Vol. 9, pp.131-148.
20. Lee-Kelley, L. and Kolsaker, A. (2004) 'E-government: The "fit" between supply assumptions and usage drivers', Electronic Government, An International Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp.130-140.
21. Mitra, R. and Gupta, M. (2007) 'Analysis of issues of e-government in Indian police', Electronic Government, An International Journal, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 97-125.
22. Nunnally, J. (1967) Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
23. Peters, R., Janssen, M. and Engers, T. (2004) 'Measuring e-government impact: existing practices and shortcomings', ICEC04, Sixth International Conference on Electronic Commerce. Available online at: http://portal.acm.org/ citation.cfm?id=1052220 (accessed on 29 August 2008).
24. Petricek, V., Escher, T., Cox, I and Margetts, H. (2006) 'The web structure of e-government - developing a methodology for quantitative evaluation', The International World Wide Web Conference Committee (IW3C2). Available online at: http://www.iw3c2.org/ (accessed on 29 August 2008).
25. Salem, F. (2007) 'Benchmarking the e-government Bulldozer: beyond measuring the tread marks', Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp.9-22.
26. Straub, D., Limayem, M. and Karahanna-Evaristo, E. (1995) 'Measuring system usage: implication for IS theory testing', Management Science, Vol. 41, No. 8, pp.1328-1342.
27. Taylor Nelson Sofres (2003) Government Online: An International Perspective, Annual Global Report.
28. United Nations/American Society for Public Administration (UN/ASPA) (2002) Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective: Assessing the Progress of the UN Member Sates, UN/ASPA, New York.
29. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. (2000) 'A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies', Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp.186-214.
30. West, D. (2004) 'E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes', Public Administration Review, Vol. 64, No, 1, pp.15-27.
31. Westholm, H. and Aichholzer, G. (2003) Prima strategic guideline 1: e-administration, PRISMA project and information society technology. Available online at: http://www.eivc.org/uni/Uploads/admin/SG1administration.pdf (accessed on 25 May 2008).