Uncovering the dominant scatterer in graphene sheets on SiO2

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 82, Issue 8, 2010, Pages

  Katoch, Jyoti ^a   Chen, J H ^b   Tsuchikawa, Ryuichi ^a   Smith, C W ^a   Mucciolo, E R ^a   Ishigami, Masa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b Bldg 142   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957586491     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.081417     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. K. I. Bolotin, Solid State Commun. 146, 351 (2008). 10.1016/j.ssc.2008. 02.024
2. K. I. Bolotin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 096802 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 101.096802
3. A. H. Castro Neto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009). 10.1103/RevModPhys.81. 109
4. A. K. Geim, Science 324, 1530 (2009). 10.1126/science.1158877
5. A. K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov, Nature Mater. 6, 183 (2007). 10.1038/nmat1849
6. S. Adam, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 18392 (2007). 10.1073/pnas.0704772104
7. T. Ando, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75, 074716 (2006). 10.1143/JPSJ.75.074716
8. M. I. Katsnelson and A. K. Geim, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 366, 195 (2008). 10.1098/rsta.2007.2157
9. P. M. Ostrovsky, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Phys. Rev. B 74, 235443 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.235443
10. T. Stauber, N. M. R. Peres, and F. Guinea, Phys. Rev. B 76, 205423 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.205423
11. M. Titov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 076802 (2010). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104. 076802
12. T. O. Wehling, M. I. Katsnelson, and A. I. Lichtenstein, Phys. Rev. B 80, 085428 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.085428
13. J. H. Chen, Nat. Phys. 4, 377 (2008). 10.1038/nphys935
14. J. H. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 236805 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102. 236805
15. A. Bostwick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 056404 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 103.056404
16. D. C. Elias, Science 323, 610 (2009). 10.1126/science.1167130
17. Z. H. Ni, arXiv:1003.0202. v2 (unpublished).
18. L. A. Ponomarenko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 206603 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.206603
19. C. Jang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 146805 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101. 146805
20. Graphene is obtained from Kish graphite by mechanical exfoliation (Ref.) on 280 nm SiO 2 over doped Si, which is used as the back gate. Raman spectroscopy is used to confirm that the samples are single layer graphene. Au/Cr electrodes, defined by electron-beam lithography, contact the graphene sheets. The devices are annealed in H 2 / Ar at 300 ° C for 1 hour to remove resist residues. Each device is annealed in ultrahigh vacuum at 490 K for longer than 8 hours to eliminate any residual adsorbates prior to hydrogen dosing experiments.
21. The voltage probes were placed on graphene areas measuring (length × width) 5.0 × 6.4 μ m 2 (sample A), 0.74 × 0.31 μ m 2 (sample B), and 7.8 × 8.2 μ m 2 (sample C).
22. Dosing is done at a constant temperature, which varied between different devices.
23. The dosage rate is estimated from the angular distribution of atomic hydrogen provided by the manufacturer.
24. S. Ryu, Nano Lett. 8, 4597 (2008). 10.1021/nl802940s
25. Z. H. Zhu, G. Q. Lu, and F. Y. Wang, J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 7923 (2005). 10.1021/jp044407s
26. M. A. Carneiro and R. B. Capaz (private communication).
27. L. M. Malard, Phys. Rep. 473, 51 (2009). 10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.003
28. M. M. Lucchese, Carbon 48, 1592 (2010). 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.12.057
29. L. G. Cançado, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 163106 (2006). 10.1063/1.2196057
30. K. Sato, Chem. Phys. Lett. 427, 117 (2006). 10.1016/j.cplett.2006.05.107
31. Multiple Lorentzian peaks near 1250, 1350, and 1450 cm - 1 were fitted to the experimental data to determine the peak height.
32. N. M. R. Peres, F. Guinea, and A. H. C. Neto, Phys. Rev. B 73, 125411 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.125411
33. E. R. Mucciolo and N. M. R. Peres (unpublished).
34. S. Adam, P. W. Brouwer, and S. D. Sarma, Phys. Rev. B 79, 201404 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.201404
35. Previous calculations using resonant scatterers with infinite on-site energy yield a resistivity exponent less or equal to - 1.
36. μ = 1 c g d σ d V g where μ is field-effect mobility and c g is capacitance per unit area, was used to calculate the gate-dependent mobility.
37. S. V. Morozov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 016602 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 100.016602
38. Y. W. Tan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 246803 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99. 246803
39. T. Zecho, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 8486 (2002). 10.1063/1.1511729
40. J. Kerwin and B. Jackson, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 084702 (2008). 10.1063/1.2868771
41. F. Guinea, B. Horovitz, and P. L. Doussal, Solid State Commun. 149, 1140 (2009). 10.1016/j.ssc.2009.02.044
42. V. M. Pereira, arXiv:1004.5384. v1 (unpublished).
43. K. S. Novoselov, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 10451 (2005). 10.1073/pnas.0502848102
44. A. C. Ferrari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 187401 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 97.187401
45. M. Ishigami, Nano Lett. 7, 1643 (2007). 10.1021/nl070613a
46. T. O. Wehling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 056802 (2010). 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 105.056802