Negative campaigning in a multiparty system

Representation

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 27-39

  Elmelund Præstekær, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957280153     PISSN: 00344893     EISSN: 17494001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00344890701869082     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ANSOLABEHERE, STEPHEN, SHANTO IYENGAR, ADAM SIMON and NICHOLAS VALENTINO. 1994. Does attack advertising demobilize the electorate? American Political Science Review 88(4): 829-38.
2. BOWLER, SHAUN and DAVID FARRELL. 1992. The study of election campaigning. In Electoral strategies and political marketing, edited by Shaun Bowler and David Farrell. New York: St Martin's Press, pp. 1-23.
3. DAMORE, DAVID. 2002. Candidate strategy and the decision to go negative. Political Research Quarterly 55(3): 669-85.
4. DESPOSATA, SCOTT. 2004. Going negative in comparative perspective: Electoral rules and campaign strategies. Working paper, University of Arizona.
5. DE VREESE, CLAES, SUSAN BANDUCCI, HOLLI SEMETKO and HAJO BOOMGAARDEN. 2006. The news coverage of the 2004 European parliamentary election campaign in 25 countries. European Union Politics 7(4): 477-504.
6. ECKSTEIN, HARRY. 1975. Case study and theory in political science. In The handbook of political science: Strategies of inquiry, edited by Fred Greenstein and Nelson Polsby. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 79-138.
7. FINKEL, STEVEN and JOHN GEER. 1998. A spot check: Casting doubt on the demobilizing effect of attack advertising. American Journal of Political Science 42(2): 573-95.
8. FREEDMAN, PAUL and KENNETH GOLDSTEIN. 1999. Measuring media exposure and the effects of negative campaign ads. American Journal of Political Science 43(4): 1189-1208.
9. GEER, JOHN. 2006. In defence of negativity - Attack ads in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. HAKANSSON, NICKLAS. 1999. Valretorik. Om politiskt sprctk I partipropagandan [Election Rhetoric. On political language in party propoganda]. Goteborg: Statsvetenskapliga institutionen Goteborgs universitet.
11. HARRINGTON, JOSEPH and GREGORY HESS. 1996. A spatial theory of positive and negative campaigning. Games and Economic Behavior 17(2): 209-29.
12. HOLBROOK, THOMAS. 1996. Do campaigns matter?. London: Sage Publications.
13. IRWIN, GALEN. 1996. Second-order or third-rate? Issues in the campaign for the European Parliament 1994. Electoral Studies 18(4): 183-99.
14. JAMIESON, KATHLEEN HALL. 1992. Dirty politics: Deception, distraction, and democracy. New York: oxford University Press.
15. JOHNSTON and ANNE. 1991. Political broadcasts: An analysis of form, content, and style in presidential communication. In Mediated politics in two cultures: Presidential campaigning in the United States and France, edited by Lynda Lee Kaid, Jacques Gerstle and Keith Sanders. London: Praeger, pp. 59-72.
16. KAHN, KIM and PATRICK KENNEY. 1999. The spectacle of US Senate campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. KAID, LYNDA LEE and CHRISTINA HOLTZ-BACHA. 1995. Political advertising across cultures: Campaigning content, styles, and effects. In Western democracies: Parties and candidates on television, edited by Lynda Lee Kaid and Christina Holtz-Bacha. London: Sage Publications, pp. 206-27.
18. KATZ, RICHARD S. 1986. Party government: A rationalistic conception. In Visions and realities of party government, edited by Francis G. Castles and Rudolf Wildenmann. New York: de Gruyter, pp. 31-71.
19. KRIPPENDORFF, KLAUS. 1980. Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage Publications.
20. KROGSTAD, ANNE. 2001. Image and issue in televised debates. In Instead of the ideal debate: Doing politics and doing gender in Nordic political campaign discourse, edited by Kirsten Gomard and Anne Krogstad. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, pp. 155-84.
21. KROGSTAD, ANNE. 2004. Fjernsynsvalgkamp. Noen retoriske ovelser i fordeling av skyld og *re [Some rhetorical exercises in distribution of honour and blame]. In I valgkampens hete. Strategisk kommunikasjon og politisk usikkerhet [In the heat of the election campaign. Strategic communication and political uncertainty], edited by Bernt Aardal, Anne Krogstad and Hanne Marthe Narud. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, pp. 85-112.
22. LAU, RICHARD and GERALD POMPER. 2001. Negative campaigning by US Senate candidates. Party Politics 7(1): 69-87.
23. LAU, RICHARD, LEE SIGELMAN, CAROLINE HELDMAN and PAUL BABBITT. 1999. The effects of negative political advertisements: A meta-analytic assessment. American Political Science Review 93(4): 851-75.
24. LAVER, MICHAEL and NORMAN SCHOFIELD. 1990. Multiparty government: The politics of coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. MA, NGOK and CHI-KEUNG CHOY. 2003. The impact of electoral rule change on party campaign strategy: Hong Kong as a case study. Party Politics 9(3): 347-67.
26. MARSH, MICHAEL. 1998. Testing the second-order model after four European elections. British Journal of Political Science 28(4): 591-607.
27. MARTIN, POUL. 2004. Inside the black box of negative campaign effects: Three reasons why negative campaigns mobilize. Political Psychology 25(4): 545-62.
28. MAYER, WILLIAM. 1996. In defence of negative campaigning. Political Science Quarterly 111(3): 437-55.
29. POLBORN, MATTIAS and DAVID YI. 2006. Informative positive and negative campaigning. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1(4): 351-71.
30. REIF, KARLHEINZ and HERMANN SCHMITT. 1980. Nine second-order national elections - A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research 8(1): 3-44.
31. SARTORI, GIOVANNI. 1976. Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis. Cambridge: cambridge University press.
32. SKAPERDAS, STERGIOS and BERNARD GROFMAN. 1995. Modeling negative campaigning. American Political Science Review 89(1): 49-61.
33. SIUNE, KAREN. 1995. Political advertising in Denmark. In Western democracies: Parties and candidates on television, edited by Lynda Lee Kaid and Christina Holtz-Bacha. London: Sage Publications, pp. 124-42.