Adaptation to different mouth shapes influences visual perception of ambiguous lip speech

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 522-528

  Jones, Benedict C ^a   Feinberg, David R ^b   Bestelmeyer, Patricia E G ^c   DeBruine, Lisa M ^a   Little, Anthony C ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LIP READING; MALE; MOUTH; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONATION; PHONETICS; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; FACE; FEMALE; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; LIPREADING; MALE; MOUTH; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONATION; PHONETICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957263746     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.4.522     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bertelson, P., Vroomen, J., & de Gelder, B. (2003). Visual recalibration of auditory speech identification: A McGurk aftereffect. Psychological Science, 14, 592-597.
2. Bestelmeyer, P. E. G., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Perrett, D. I., Schneider, A., et al. (2008). Sex-contingent face aftereffects depend on perceptual category rather than structural encoding. Cognition, 107, 353-365. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.018
3. Bestelmeyer, P. E. G., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Schneider, A., Welling, L. L. M., & Conway, C. A. (2010). Face aftereffects demonstrate interdependent processing of expressions and the invariant characteristics of sex and race. Visual Cognition, 18, 255-274.
4. Bruce, V., & Young, A. W. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305-327.
5. Calder, A. J., Jenkins, R., Cassel, A., & Clifford, C. W. G. (2008). Visual representation of eye gaze is coded by a nonopponent multichannel system. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 244-261. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.244
6. DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Unger, L., Little, A. C., & Feinberg, D. R. (2007). Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: Attractive faces are not always average. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 1420-1430.
7. Eisner, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2005). The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 224-238.
8. Fang, F., Ijichi, K., & He, S. (2007). Transfer of the face viewpoint aftereffect from adaptation to different and inverted faces. Journal of Vision, 7(13, Art. 6), 1-9.
9. García-Pérez, M. A., & Alcalá-Quintana, R. (2005). Sampling plans for fitting the psychometric function. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 8, 256-289.
10. Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 223-233.
11. Hsu, S.-M., & Young, A. W. (2004). Adaptation effects in facial expression recognition. Visual Cognition, 11, 871-899.
12. Jaquet, E., Rhodes, G., & Hayward, W. G. (2007). Opposite aftereffects for Chinese and Caucasian faces are selective for social category information and not just physical face differences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1457-1467.
13. Jeffery, L., Rhodes, G., & Busey, T. (2006). View-specific coding of face shape. Psychological Science, 17, 501-505. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01735.x
14. Jenkins, R., Beaver, J. D., & Calder, A. J. (2006). I thought you were looking at me: Direction-specific aftereffects in gaze perception. Psychological Science, 17, 506-513.
15. Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Little, A. C. (2008). Adaptation reinforces preferences for correlates of attractive facial cues. Visual Cognition, 16, 849-858. doi:10.1080/13506280701760811
16. Leopold, D. A., O'Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 89-94.
17. Leopold, D. A., Rhodes, G., Müller, K.-M., & Jeffery, L. (2005). The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, 897-904.
18. Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2005). Sex-contingent face aftereffects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, 1-5. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3220
19. Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., & Waitt, C. (2008). Category contingent aftereffects for faces of different races, ages and species. Cognition, 106, 1537-1547.
20. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
21. Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T. L., Clifford, C. W. G., & Nakayama, K. (2003). Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science, 14, 558-566.
22. Rotshtein, P., Henson, R. N. A., Treves, A., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2005). Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 107-113. doi:10.1038/nn1370
23. Tiddeman, B. P., Perrett, D. I., & Burt, D. M. (2001). Prototyping and transforming facial textures for perception research. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, 21, 42-50.
24. van Linden, S., & Vroomen, J. (2007). Recalibration of phonetic categories by lipread speech versus lexical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 1483-1494.
25. Vroomen, J., & Baart, M. (2009). Recalibration of phonetic categories by lipread speech: Measuring aftereffects after a 24-hour delay. Language & Speech, 52, 341-350.
26. Webster, M. A., Kaping, D., Mizokami, Y., & Duhamel, P. (2004). Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature, 428, 557-561.
27. Webster, M. A., & MacLin, O. H. (1999). Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 647-653.
28. Winston, J. S., Henson, R. N. A., Fine-Goulden, M. R., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). FMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 1830-1839.
29. Xu, H., Dayan, P., Lipkin, R. M., & Qian, N. (2008). Adaptation across the cortical hierarchy: Low-level curve adaptation affects high-level facial-expression judgments. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 3374-3383. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0182-08.2008
30. Yamashita, J. A., Hardy, J. L., De Valois, K. K., & Webster, M. A. (2005). Stimulus selectivity of figural aftereffects for faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 420-437. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.420