Dissociating Averageness and Attractiveness: Attractive Faces Are Not Always Average

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1420-1430

  DeBruine, Lisa M ^a   Jones, Benedict C ^a   Unger, Layla ^a   Little, Anthony C ^b   Feinberg, David R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

attractiveness; averageness; faces; visual adaptation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; ESTHETICS; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; REFERENCE VALUE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BEAUTY; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REFERENCE VALUES; SIZE PERCEPTION;

EID: 38349158730     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1420     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Buchanan T. Internet research: Self-monitoring and judgments of attractiveness. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 32 (2000) 521-527
2. Buckingham G., DeBruine L.M., Little A.C., Welling L.M., Conway C.A., Tiddeman B.P., et al. Visual adaptation to masculine and feminine faces influences generalized preferences and perceptions of trustworthiness. Evolution and Human Behavior 27 (2006) 381-389
3. Cash T.F., Cash D.W., and Butters J.W. "Mirror, mirror, on the wall...?": Contrast effects and self-evaluations of physical attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 9 (1983) 351-358
4. Feinberg D.R., Jones B.C., DeBruine L.M., Moore F.R., Law Smith M.J., Cornwell R.E., et al. The voice and face of woman: One ornament that signals quality?. Evolution and Human Behavior 26 (2005) 398-408
5. Galton F.J. Composite portraits made by combining those of many different persons into a single figure. Nature 18 (1878) 97-100
6. Giese M.A., and Leopold D.A. Physiologically inspired neural model for the encoding of face spaces. Neurocomputing 65-66 (2005) 93-101
7. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6 (1979) 65-70
8. Jaquet E., Rhodes G., and Hayward W.G. Figural aftereffects transfer, but are also contingent on, race categories. Journal of Vision 6 (2006) 884a
9. Jeffery L., Rhodes G., and Busey T. View-specific coding of face shape. Psychological Science 178 (2006) 501-505
10. Jiang F., Blanz V., and O'Toole A.J. Probing the visual representation of faces with adaptation: A view from the other side of the mean. Psychological Science 178 (2006) 493-500
11. Jones, B. C., Perrett, D. I., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L., Cornwell, R. E., Feinberg, D. R., et al. (2005). Menstrual cycle, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use alter attraction to apparent health in faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 272, 347-354.
12. Jones D. Sexual selection, physical attractiveness, and facial neoteny. Current Anthropology 36 (1995) 723-748
13. Langlois J., and Roggman L. Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science 1 (1990) 115-121
14. Leopold D.A., O'Toole A.J., Vetter T., and Blanz V. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience 4 (2001) 89-94
15. Leopold, D. A., Rhodes, G., Muller, K.-M., & Jeffery, L. (2005). The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 272, 897-904.
16. Levenberg K. A method for the solution of certain problems in least square. Quarterly Journal of Applied Mathematics 2 (1944) 164-168
17. Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2005). Sex-contingent face aftereffects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 272, 2283-2287.
18. Little A.C., and Hancock P.J.B. The role of masculinity and distinctiveness on the perception of attractiveness in human male faces. British Journal of Psychology 93 (2002) 451-464
19. Maner J.K., Kenrick D.T., Becker D.V., Delton A.W., Hofer B., Wilbur C.J., et al. Sexually selective cognition: Beauty captures the mind of the beholder. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (2003) 1107-1120
20. Marquardt D. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 11 (1963) 431-441
21. Perrett D.I., Lee K.J., Penton-Voak I., Rowland D., Yoshikawa S., Burt D.M., et al. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394 (1998, August 27) 884-887
22. Perrett D.I., May K.A., and Yoshikawa S. Facial shape and judgments of female attractiveness. Nature 368 (1994, March 17) 239-242
23. Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology 57 (2006) 199-226
24. Rhodes G., Harwood K., Yoshikawa S., Nishitani M., and McLean I. The attractiveness of average faces: Cross-cultural evidence and possible biological basis. In: Rhodes G., and Zebrowitz L. (Eds). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (2002), Ablex, Westport, CT 35-58
25. Rhodes G., and Jeffery L. Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity. Vision Research 46 (2006) 2977-2987
26. Rhodes G., Jeffery L., Watson T., Clifford C.W.G., and Nakayama K. Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science 14 (2003) 558-566
27. Rhodes G., Jeffery L., Watson T.L., Jaquet E., Winkler C., and Clifford C.W.G. Orientation-contingent face aftereffects and implications for face-coding mechanisms. Current Biology 14 (2004) 2119-2123
28. Rhodes G., Sumich A., and Byatt G. Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry?. Psychological Science 10 (1999) 52-58
29. Rhodes G., Yoshhikawa S., Clark A., Lee K., McKay R., and Akamatsu S. Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-Western cultures: In search of biologically based standards of beauty. Perception 30 (2001) 611-625
30. Rowland D., and Perrett D.I. Manipulating facial appearance through shape and color. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 15 (1995) 70-76
31. Rubenstein A.J., Langlois J.H., and Roggman L.A. What makes a face attractive and why: The role of averageness in defining facial beauty. In: Rhodes G., and Zebrowitz L. (Eds). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (2002), Ablex, Westport, CT 1-34
32. Shimojo S., Simion C., Shimojo E., and Scheier C. Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nature Neuroscience 6 (2003) 1317-1322
33. Thornhill R., and Gangestad S.W. Human facial beauty: Averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance. Human Nature 4 (1993) 237-269
34. Tsao D.Y., and Freiwald W.A. What's so special about the average face?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (2006) 391-393
35. Valentine T. A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 43 A (1991) 161-204
36. Valentine T., Darling S., and Donnelly M. Why are average faces attractive? The effect of view and averageness on the attractiveness of female faces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 11 (2004) 482-487
37. Webster M.A., Kaping D., Mizokami Y., and Duhamel P. Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature 428 (2004, April 1) 557-561
38. Webster M.A., and MacLin O.H. Figural after-effects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 6 (1999) 647-653
39. Wickham L.H.V., Morris P.E., and Fritz C.O. Facial distinctiveness: Its measurement, distribution and influence on immediate and delayed recognition. British Journal of Psychology 91 (2000) 99-123
40. Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (2003). Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 271, S177-S179.