A four to six years follow-up of indirect resin composite inlays/onlays

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 247-251

  Leirskar, Jakob ^a   Nordbø, Håkon ^a   Thoresen, Nina Rygh ^a   Henaug, Turid ^a   Von der Fehr, Frithjof Ramm ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Class II restorations; Clinical trial; Dental materials; Esthetic restorations; Operative dentistry

Indexed keywords

AMALGAM; MAXXIM; RESIN CEMENT; TETRIC; TOOTH CEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; ESTHETIC SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MOUTH HYGIENE; PUBLIC HEALTH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL; TOOTH FILLING; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INLAYS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SILICON DIOXIDE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0041823163     PISSN: 00016357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016350310004557     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Rueggeberg FA, Jordan DM. Effect of light-tip distance on polymerization of resin composite. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:364-70.
2. Kanca J. The effect of thickness and shade on the polymerization of light-activated posterior composite resins. Quintessence Int 1986;17:809-11.
3. von Mörmann W, Ameye C, Lutz F. Komposit-Inlays: Marginale Adaptation, Randdichtigkeit, Porosität und okklusaler Verschleiss. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1982;37:438-41.
4. Khan AM, Satou N, Shintani H, Taira M, Wakasa K, Yamaki M. Effects of post-curing by heat on the mechanical properties of visible-light cured inlay composites. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:605-14.
5. Kildal KK, Ruyter IE. How different curing methods affect the degree of conversion of resin-based inlay/onlay materials. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52:315-22.
6. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Post-cure heat treatments for composites: properties and fractography. Dent Mater 1992;8:290-5.
7. van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P. Marginal breakdown of 5-year-old direct composite inlays. J Dent 1996;24:389-94.
8. Park S-H. Comparison of degree of conversion for light-cured and additionally heat-cured composites. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76: 613-18.
9. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. A comparison of accuracy in seating and gap formation for three inlay/onlay techniques. Oper Dent 1990;15:129-35.
10. Shortall AC, Baylis RL. Microleakage around direct composite inlays. J Dent 1991;19:307-11.
11. Ziskind D, Avivi-Arber L, Haramati O, Hirschfeld Z. Amalgam alternatives-micro-leakage evaluation of clinical procedures. Part I: direct composite/composite inlay/ceramic inlay. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:443-47.
12. Leirskar J, Henaug T, Thoresen NR, Nordbø H, von der Fehr FR. Clinical performance of indirect composite resin inlays/onlays in a dental school: observations up to 34 months. Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57:216-20.
13. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30:347-58.
14. Manhart J, Neuerer P, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Hickel R. Three-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:289-96.
15. van Dijken JWV. A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52:368-76.
16. van Dijken JWV. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11-year follow-up. J Dent 2000;28:299-306.
17. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhesive Dent 2001;3:45-64.
18. Nordbø H, Leirskar J, von der Fehr FR. Saucer-shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: observations up to 10 years. Quintessence Int 1998;29:5-11.
19. Pallesen U, Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7.
20. Eriksen HM, Bjertness E, Hansen BF. Cross-sectional clinical study of quality of amalgam restorations, oral health and prevalence of recurrent caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1986;14:15-8.
21. Wassel RW, Walls AWG, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up. J Dent 2000;28:375-82.