The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials

Annals of Internal Medicine

Volumn 134, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 657-662

  Moher, D ^a   Schulz, K F ^a   Altman, D G ^a   Lepage, L ^a  

^a CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; DATA ANALYSIS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARD;

EID: 0035901583     PISSN: 00034819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00011     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
2. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
3. Content and quality of 2000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 50 years
4. Putting trials on trial - The costs and consequences of small trials in depression: A systematic review of methodology
5. Size and quality of randomised controlled trials in head injury: Review of published studies
6. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement
7. CONSORT: An important step toward evidence-based health care. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials
8. Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: The CONSORT statement
9. The quest for unbiased research: Randomized clinical trials and the CONSORT reporting guidelines
10. CMAJ endorses the CONSORT statement. CONsolidation of Standards for Reporting Trials
11. News from the International Committee of medical journal editors
12. Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: A comparative before and after evaluation?
13. The value of patient flow charts in reports of randomized controlled trials: Bibliographic study
14. Beyond CONSORT: Need for improved reporting standards for clinical trials. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials
15. Current controlled trials: An opportunity to help improve the quality of clinical research
16. Guidelines for statistical reporting in articles for medical journals. Amplifications and explanations
17. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration
18. Extending the CONSORT statement to cluster randomised trials: For discussion
19. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials
20. Intention to treat analysis is related to methodological quality
21. Analysis of clinical trials by treatment actually received: Is it really an option?
22. Towards evidence based radiation oncology: Improving the design, analysis, and reporting of clinical outcome studies in radiotherapy
23. Consort statement on the reporting standards of clinical trials. MRC uses checklist similar to CONSORT's
24. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses
25. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group
26. Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
27. The quality of reporting in published cost-utility analyses, 1976-1997
28. The scandal of poor medical research