Predicting homework distraction at the secondary school level: A multilevel analysis

Teachers College Record

Volumn 112, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1937-1970

  Xu, Jianzhong ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956984753     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (120)

1. Ballard, K. D. (2003,June). Media habits and academic performance: Elementary and middle school students' perceptions. Paper presented at the National Media Education Conference, Baltimore, MD.
2. Beentjes, J. W. J., Koolstra, C. M., & van der Voort, T. H. A. (1996). Combining background media with doing homework: Incidence of background media use and perceived effects. Communication Education, 45, 59-72. (Pubitemid 126025765)
3. Bembenutty, H., & Karabenick, S. A. (2004). Inherent association between academic delay of gratification, future time perspective, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 35-57. (Pubitemid 39015241)
4. Bempechat, J. (2004). The motivational benefits of homework: A social-cognitive perspective. Theory Into Practice, 43, 189-196. (Pubitemid 39258761)
5. Bennett, S., & Kalish, N. (2006). The case against homework: How homework is hurting our children and what we can do about it New York: Crown.
6. Benson, R. (1988). Helping pupils overcome homework distractions. Clearing House, 61, 370-372.
7. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 199-231. (Pubitemid 40506536)
8. Botvinick, M. M., & Bylsma, L. M. (2005). Distraction and action slips in an everyday task: Evidence for a dynamic representation of task context Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 1011-1017.
9. Bryan, T., Nelson, C., & Mathur, S. (1995). Homework: A survey of primary students in regular, resource, and self-contained special education classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 10, 85-90.
10. Common Core of Data. (2005-2006). Common Core of Data, 2005-2006 (Version la). Retrieved November 19, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pubschuniv.asp
11. Cook, S. (2000, October 24). One eye on homework - the other on e-mail, TV, games... Christian Science Monitor, 92(233), 16.
12. Cooper, H. (1989). Homework. White Plains, NY: Longman.
13. Cooper, H. (2001). The battle over homework: Common ground for administrators, teachers, and parents (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
14. Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., & Nye, B. (2000). Homework in the home: How student, family and parenting-style differences relate to the homework process. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 464-487.
15. Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., Nye, B., & Greathouse, S. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 70-83. (Pubitemid 128045540)
16. Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76, 1-62. (Pubitemid 43453740)
17. Cooper, H., & Valentine, J. C. (2001). Using research to answer practical questions about homework. Educational Psychologist, 36, 143-153. (Pubitemid 33583731)
18. Cooper, J. E., Horn, S., & Strahan, D. B. (2005). "If only they would do their homework": Promoting self-regulation in high school English classes. High School Journal, 88(3), 10-26.
19. Corno, L. (1993). The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(2), 14-22.
20. Corno, L. (1994). Student volition and education: Outcomes, influences, and practices. In D. H. Schunk & B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 229-255). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Corno, L. (1996). Homework is a complicated thing. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 27-30.
22. Corno, L. (2000). Looking at homework differently. Elementary School Journal, 100, 529-548.
23. Corno, L. (2001). Self-regulated learning: A volitional analysis. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (Vol. 2, pp. 111-142). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Corno, L. (2004). Introduction to the special issue work habits and work styles: Volition in education. Teachers College Record, 106, 1669-1694. (Pubitemid 39453924)
25. Corno, L., & Xu, J. (2004). Doing homework as the job of childhood. Theory Into Practice, 43, 227-233.
26. Coutts, P. M. (2004). Meanings of homework and implications for practice. Theory Into Practice, 43, 182-188.
27. Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28. Covington, M. V. (1998). The will to learn: A guide for motivating young people. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29. Dahl, M. (2006, November 10). Really, I'm listening; Digital-sawy teens say parents shouldn't stress about all their electronic multitasking. The Sacramento Bee, p. J1.
30. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26, 325-346.
31. Deslandes, R., & Cloutier, R. (2002). Adolescents' perception of parental involvement in schooling. School Psychology International, 23, 220-232.
32. Eccles, J. S. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: Freeman.
33. Epstein, J. L., & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2001). More than minutes: Teachers' roles in designing homework. Educational Psychologist, 36, 181-193. (Pubitemid 33583734)
34. Fan, X., & Thompson, B. (2001). Confidence intervals about score reliability coefficients, please: An EPM guidelines editorial. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 517-531. (Pubitemid 33308785)
35. Felson, R. B., & Reed, M. D. (1986). Reference groups and self-appraisals of academic ability and performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 103-109.
36. Fowler, F. J. (1995). Improving survey questions: Design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Foehr, U. G. (2006). Media multitasking among American youth: Prevalence, predictors, and pairings. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
38. Foerde, K., Knowlton, B. J., & Poldrack R. A. (2006). Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 11778-11783. (Pubitemid 44182527)
39. Gaither, C. (2006, August 11). They do it all while studying: At homework time, many students also playing games, e-mailing friends and watching TV. The Los Angeles Times, p. A28.
40. Garcia, T., McCann, E.J., Turner.J. E., & Roska, L. (1998). Modeling the mediating role of volition in the learning process. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 392-418. (Pubitemid 128347384)
41. Gill, B. P., & Schlossman, S. L. (2000). The lost cause of homework reform. American Journal of Education, 109, 27-62.
42. Gill, B. P., & Schlossman, S. L. (2004). Villain or savior? The American discourse on homework, 1850-2003. Theory Into Practice, 43, 174-181.
43. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models. London: Edward Arnold.
44. Harris, S., Nixon, J., & Rudduck, J. (1993). School work, homework and gender. Gender and Education, 5, 3-14.
45. Heckhausen, H. (1991). Motivation and action. New York: Springer-Verlag.
46. Heckhausen, H., & Kuhl, J. (1985). From wishes to action: The dead-ends and shortcuts on the long way to action. In M. Frese &J. Sabini (Eds.), Goal-directed behavior: The concept of action in psychology (pp. 134-160). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23, 723-744. (Pubitemid 127173459)
48. Hong, E., & Milgram, R. M. (1999). Preferred and actual homework style: A cross-cultural examination. Educational Research, 41, 251-265.
49. Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Battiato, A. C., Walker,J. M., Reed, R. P., DeLong,J. M., &Jones, K. P. (2001). Parental involvement in homework. Educational Psychologist, 36, 195-204.
50. Horn, L., & West, J. (1992). National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988: A profile of parents of eighth graders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
51. Hox, J. J., & Kreft, I. G. G. (1994). Multilevel analysis methods. Sociological Methods and Research, 22, 283-299.
52. Isaac, J. D., Sansone, C., & Smith, J. L. (1999). Other people as a source of interest in an activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 239-265.
53. Jackson, C. (2002). "Laddishness" as a self-worth protection strategy. Gender and Education, 14, 37-51.
54. Jackson, C. (2003). Motives for "laddishness" at school: Fear of failure and fear of the "feminine." British Educational Research Journal, 29, 583-598.
55. Kohn, A. (2006). The homework myth: Why our kids get too much of a bad thing. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.
56. Koszycki, D., Benger, M., Shlik, J., & Bradwejn, J. (2007). Randomized trial of a meditationbased stress reduction program and cognitive behavior therapy in generalized social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2518-2526. (Pubitemid 47374085)
57. Kralovec, E., & Buell, J. (2000). The end of homework: How homework disrupts families, overburdens children, and limits learning. Boston: Beacon Press.
58. Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action-control. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13, pp. 99-171). New York: Academic Press.
59. Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognition-behavior consistency: Self-regulatory processes and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl &J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp.101-128). New York: Springer-Verlag.
60. Kuhl, J. (2000). The volitional basis of personality systems interaction theory: Applications in learning and treatment contexts. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 665-704.
61. Kuhl, J., & Fuhrmann, A. (1998). Decomposing self-regulation and self-control: The volitional component inventory. In J. Heckhausen & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Motivation and selfregulation across the life span (pp. 15-49). New York: Cambridge University Press.
62. Lee, V. E. (2000). Using hierarchical linear modeling to study social contexts: The case of school effects. Educational Psychologist, 35, 125-141.
63. Lenhart, A., Madden M., & Hitlin, P. (2005). Teens and technology: Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
64. Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., & Lewis, O. (2001). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant-message generation and the Internet's impact on friendships and family relationships Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
65. Leone, C. M., & Richards, M. H. (1989). Classwork and homework in early adolescence: The ecology of achievement Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 18, 531-548.
66. Loveless, T. (2003). The 2003 Brown Center Report on American education: How well are American students learning? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
67. Ludtke, O., Koller, O., Marsh, H. W., & Trautwein, U. (2005). Teacher frame of reference and the big-fish-little pond effect. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 263-285. (Pubitemid 40757530)
68. Marzano, R. J., & Pickering, D.J. (2007). The case for and against homework. Educational Leadership, 64(6), 74-79.
69. McCann, E. J., & Turner, J. E. (2004). Increasing student learning through volitional control. Teachers College Record, 106, 1695-1714. (Pubitemid 39453925)
70. McHale, T. (2005). Portrait of a digital native: Are digital-age students fundamentally different from the rest of us? Technology and Learning, 26(2), 33.
71. Murphy, J., Decker, K., Chaplin, C., Dagenais, R., Heller, J., Jones, R., et al. (1987). An exploratory analysis of the structure of homework assignments in high schools. Research in Rural Education, 4, 61-71.
72. National School Boards Association. (2007). Creating and connecting Research and guidelines on online social - and educational - networking. Alexandria, VA: Author.
73. Natriello, G., & McDill, E. L. (1986). Performance standards, student effort on homework, and academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 59, 18-31.
74. Patton, J. E., Stinard, T. A., & Routh, D. K. (1983). Where do children study? Journal of Educational Research, 76, 280-286.
75. Pool, M. M., Koolstra, C. M., & van der Voort, T. H. A. (2003a). Distraction effects of back-ground soap operas on homework performance: An experimental study enriched with observational data. Educational Psychology, 23, 361-380. (Pubitemid 36872230)
76. Pool, M. M., Koolstra, C. M., & van der Voort, T. H. A. (2003b). The impact of background radio and television on high school students' homework performance. Journal of Communication, 53, 74-87.
77. Pool, M. M., van der Voort, T. H. A., Beentjes, J. W. J., & Koolstra, C. M. (2000). Background television as an inhibitor of performance on easy and difficult homework assignments. Communication Research, 27, 293-326.
78. Public Agenda. (2000). Survey finds little sign of backlash against academic standards or standardized tests. New York: Author.
79. Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
80. Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong Y. F., Congdon, R., & Toit, M. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
81. Reach, K., & Cooper, H. (2004). Homework hotlines: Recommendations for successful practice. Theory Into Prartice, 43, 234-241. (Pubitemid 39258767)
82. Roberts, D. F., Foehr, U. G., & Rideout, V. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
83. Rogers, D., & Swan, K. (2004). Self-regulated learning and internet searching. Teachers College Record, 106, 1804-1824.
84. Ryan, A. M., Gheen, M. H., & Midgley, C. (1998). Why do some students avoid asking for help? An examination of the interplay among students' academic efficacy, teachers' social-emotional role, and the classroom goal structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 528-535.
85. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
86. Schmid, R. (2006). Listen to mom and dad: Distractions make learning less efficient Retrieved December 18, 2006, from http://www.usatoday.com/tech/ science/discoveries/2006-07-24-distractions-learning-x.htm?csp=34
87. Schmitz, B., & Wiese, B. S. (2006). New perspectives for the evaluation of training sessions in self-regulated learning: Time-series analyses of diary data. Contempary Educational Psychology, 31, 64-96. (Pubitemid 43045818)
88. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
89. Taylor, C. L. (2006, December 17). Teens' balancing act: New study shows young people are spending more time multitasking, with mixed results. Newsday, p. 37.
90. Trautwein, U., & Koller, O. (2003). The relationship between homework and achievement - still much of a mystery. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 115-145. (Pubitemid 38103657)
91. Trautwein, U., Koller, O., Schmitz, B., Sc Baumert, J. (2002). Do homework assignments enhance achievement? A multilevel analysis of 7th grade mathematics. Comtemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 26-50.
92. Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Schnyder, I., & Niggli, A. (2006). Predicting homework effort: Support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 438-456. (Pubitemid 43892978)
93. van Eerde, W. (2000). Procrastination: Self-regulation in initiating aversive goals. Applied Psychology: An Internatinal Review, 49, 372-389.
94. Verma, S., Sharma, D., & Larson, R. W. (2002). School stress in India: Effects on time and daily emotions. International Journal of Behavior Development, 26, 500-508. (Pubitemid 35378795)
95. Walberg, H. J., Paschal, R. A., & Weinstein, T. (1985). Homework's powerful effects on learning. Educational Leadership, 42, 76-79.
96. Wallis, C. (2006, March 27). The multitasking generation: They're e-mailing, IMing and downloading while writing the history essay. What is all that digital juggling doing to kids' brains and their family life? Time, pp. 48-55.
97. Warton, P. M. (2001). The forgotten voices in homework: Views of students. Educational Psychologist, 36, 155-165.
98. Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 49-78.
99. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
100. Winne, P. H. (2004). Putting volition to work in education. Teachers College Record, 106, 1879-1887.
101. Winship, C., & Sobel, M. E. (2004). Causal inferences in sociological studies. In M. Hardy Sc A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 481-503). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
102. Wober, J. M. (1992). Text in a texture of television: Children's homework experience. Journal of Educational Television, 18, 23-34.
103. Wolters, C. A. "(2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189-205.
104. Xu, J. (1994). Doing homework: A study of possibilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
105. Xu, J. (2004). Family help and homework management in urban and rural secondary schools. Teachers College Record, 106, 1786-1803.
106. Xu, J. (2005). Purposes for doing homework reported by middle and high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 46-55.
107. Xu, J. (2006). Gender and homework management reported by high school students. Educational Psychology, 26, 73-91.
108. Xu, J. (2007). Middle-school homework management: More than just gender and family involvement Educational Psychology, 27, 173-189.
109. Xu, J. (2008a). Models of secondary students' interest in homework: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 1180-1205.
110. Xu, J. (2008b). Validation of scores on the homework management scale for high school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 304-324.
111. Xu, J. (2008c). Validation of scores on the homework management scale for middle school students. Elementary School Journal, 109, 82-95.
112. Xu, J. (2010a). Homework purpose scale for high school students: A validation study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 459-476.
113. Xu, J. (2010b). Homework purposes reported by secondary school students: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 103, 171-182.
114. Xu, J., & Corno, L. (1998). Case studies of families doing third-grade homework. Teachers College Record, 100, 402-436.
115. Xu, J., & Corno, L. (2003). Family help and homework management reported by middle school students. Elementary School Journal, 103, 503-518
116. Xu, J., & Corno, L. (2006). Gender, family help, and homework management reported by rural middle school students. Journal ofResearch in Rural Education, 21(2). Retrieved May 15, 2008, from http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/21- 2.pdf
117. Xu, J., & Yuan, R. (2003). Doing homework: Listening to students', parents', and teachers' voices in one urban middle school community. School Community Journal, 13(2), 25-44.
118. Zimmerman, B.J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk & B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
119. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628.
120. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.