Homework purpose scale for high school students: A validation study

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 459-476

  Xu, Jianzhong ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Factor analysis; High school students; Homework purpose; Scale development

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954012645     PISSN: 00131644     EISSN: 15523888     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013164409344517     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Arnold, M.L., Newman, J.H., Gaddy, B.B., & Dean, C.B. (2005). A look at the condition of rural education research: Setting a direction for future research. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(6). Retrieved August 5, 2009, from http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/20-6.pdf.
2. Bentler, P.M. (2006). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
3. Brock, C.H., Lapp, D., Flood, J., Fisher, D., & Han, K.T. (2007). Does homework matter? An investigation of teacher perceptions about homework practices for children from nondominant backgrounds. Urban Education, 42, 349-372.
4. Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Bryan, T., Nelson, C., & Mathur, S. (1995). Homework: A survey of primary students in regular, resource, and self-contained special education classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 10, 85-90.
6. Byrne, B.M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Byrne, B.M. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema, 20, 872-882.
8. Budge, K. (2006). Rural leaders, rural places: Problem, privilege, and possibility. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 21(13). Retrieved May 9, 2008, from http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/21-13.pdf.
9. Chen, C., & Stevenson, H.W. (1989). Homework: A cross-cultural examination. Child Development, 60, 551-561.
10. Chen, F.F., Sousa, K.H., & West, S.G. (2005). Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 471-492.
11. Cheung, G.W., & Rensvold, R.B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.
12. Cobb, R.A., McIntire, W.G., & Pratt, P.A. (1989). Vocational and educational aspirations of high school students: A problem for rural America. Research in Rural Education, 6(2), 11-23.
13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Cooper, H. (1989). Homework. White Plains, NY: Longman.
15. Cooper, H., Lindsay, J.J., Nye, B., & Greathouse, S. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 70-83.
16. Cooper, H., Robinson, J.C., & Patall, E.A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76, 1-62.
17. Cooper, H., & Valentine, J.C. (2001). Using research to answer practical questions about homework. Educational Psychologist, 36, 143-153.
18. Corno, L. (2000). Looking at homework differently. Elementary School Journal, 100, 529-548.
19. Corno, L. (2004). Introduction to the special issue work habits and work styles: Volition in education. Teachers College Record, 106, 1669-1694.
20. Corno, L., & Xu, J. (2004). Doing homework as the job of childhood. Theory Into Practice, 43, 227-233.
21. Coutts, P.M. (2004). Meanings of homework and implications for practice. Theory Into Practice, 43, 182-188.
22. Eccles, J.S. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: Freeman.
23. Eccles, J.S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the achiever: The structure of adolescents' academic achievement-related beliefs and self-perceptions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215-225.
24. Eccles, J.S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
25. Epstein, J.L. (2001). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
26. Epstein, J.L., & Van Voorhis, F.L. (2001). More than minutes: Teachers' roles in designing homework. Educational Psychologist, 36, 181-193.
27. Fan, X., & Thompson, B. (2001). Confidence intervals about score reliability coefficients, please: An EPM guidelines editorial. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 517-531.
28. Foehr, U.G. (2006). Media multitasking among American youth: Prevalence, predictors, and pairings. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
29. Gandara, P., Gutierrez, D., & O'Hara, S. (2001). Planning for the future in rural and urban high schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 6, 73-93.
30. Gill, B.P., & Schlossman, S.L. (2003). Parents and the politics of homework: Some historical perspectives. Teachers College Record, 105, 846-871.
31. Haller, E.J., & Virkler, S.J. (1993). Another look at rural-nonrural differences in students' educational aspirations. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 9, 170-178.
32. Hancock, G.R. (1997). Structural equation modeling methods of hypothesis testing of latent variable means. Measuremnt and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30, 91-105.
33. Henderson, J.M. (2006). Power relations within the homework process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Stirling, Sterling, Scotland.
34. Henson, R.K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 177-189.
35. Hong, S., Malik, M.L., & Lee, M. (2003). Testing configural, metric, scalar, and latent mean invariance across genders in sociotropy and autonomy using a non-Western sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 636-654.
36. Howley, C. (2006). Remote possibilities: Rural children's educational aspirations. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(2), 62-80.
37. Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
38. Hu, S. (2003). Educational aspirations and postsecondary access and choice: Students in urban, suburban, and rural schools compared. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(14). Retrieved December 28, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n14/.
39. Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
40. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. (2005). Teens and technology: Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
41. Lenhart, A., Simon, M., & Graziano, M. (2001). The Internet and education: Findings of the Pew Internet and American Life Project. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
42. Leung, J.J. (1993). Children's attitudes toward schoolwork and perception of parental behaviors that support schoolwork (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED357859). Oshkosh: University of Wisconsin.
43. Ley, J., Nelson, S., & Beltyukova, S. (1996). Congruence of aspirations of rural youth with expectations held by parents and school staff. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 12, 133-141.
44. Loveless, T. (2003, October). The 2003 Brown Center report on American education: How well are American students learning? Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
45. Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff value for fit indexes and dangers on overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320-341.
46. Muhlenbruck, L., Cooper, H., Nye, B., & Lindsay, J.J. (2000). Homework and achievement: Explaining the different strengths of relation at the elementary and secondary school levels. Social Psychology of Education, 3, 295-317.
47. Murphy, J., Decker, K., Chaplin, C., Dagenais, R., Heller, J., Jones, R.,et al.(1987). An exploratory analysis of the structure of homework assignments in high schools. Research in Rural Education, 4, 61-71.
48. Muthén, B.O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 22, 376-398.
49. Muthén, B.O. (1997). Latent variable modeling of longitudinal and multilevel data. In A. E. Raftery (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1997 (pp. 453-481). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
50. National School Boards Association. (2007). Creating and connecting: Research and guidelines on online social and educational networking. Alexandria, VA: Author.
51. Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
52. Rogers, D., & Swan, K. (2004). Self-regulated learning and Internet searching. Teachers College Record, 106, 1804-1824.
53. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P.M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507-514.
54. Steiger, J.H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
55. Stern, J. D. (Ed.). (1994). The condition of education in rural schools (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 371 935). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
56. Usher, E.L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning: A validation study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 443-463.
57. Van Voorhis, F.L. (2001). Interactive science homework: An experiment in home and school connections. NASSP Bulletin, 85(627), 20-32.
58. Van Voorhis, F.L. (2004). Reflecting on the homework ritual: Assignments and designs. Theory Into Practice, 43, 205-212.
59. Vandenberg, R.J., & Lance, C.E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-70.
60. Warton, P.M. (2001). The forgotten voices in homework: Views of students. Educational Psychologist, 36, 155-165.
61. Widaman, K.F., & Reise, S.P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention (pp. 281-324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
62. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J.S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
63. Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., & Eccles, J.S. (2004). Expectancy value theory in cross-cultural perspective. In D. M. McInerney & S. V. Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited: Vol. 4. Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (pp. 165-198). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
64. Xu, J. (1994). Doing homework: A study of possibilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
65. Xu, J. (2004). Family help and homework management in urban and rural secondary schools. Teachers College Record, 106, 1786-1803.
66. Xu, J. (2005). Purposes for doing homework reported by middle and high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 46-55.
67. Xu, J. (2006). Gender and homework management reported by high school students. Educational Psychology, 26, 73-91.
68. Xu, J. (2007). Middle school homework management: More than just gender and family involvement. Educational Psychology, 27, 171-187.
69. Xu, J. (2008a). Models of secondary school students' interest in homework: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 1180-1205.
70. Xu, J. (2008b). Validation of scores on the homework management scale for high school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 304-324.
71. Xu, J. (2008c). Validation of scores on the homework management scale for middle school students. Elementary School Journal, 109, 82-95.
72. Xu, J. (in press). Homework purposes reported by secondary school students: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Educational Research.
73. Xu, J., & Corno, L. (1998). Case studies of families doing third-grade homework. Teachers College Record, 100, 402-436.
74. Xu, J., & Corno, L. (2003). Family help and homework management reported by middle school students. Elementary School Journal, 103, 503-518.
75. Xu, J., & Corno, L. (2006). Gender, family help, and homework management reported by rural middle school students. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 21(2). Retrieved May 15, 2008, from http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/21-2.pdf.
76. Xu, J., & Yuan, R. (2003). Doing homework: Listening to students', parents', and teachers' voices in one urban middle school community. School Community Journal, 13(2), 25-44.