Frequency, upgrade rates, and characteristics of high-risk lesions initially identified with breast MRI

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 195, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 792-798

  Strigel, Roberta M ^a,b   Eby, Peter R ^a,b   DeMartini, Wendy B ^a,b   Gutierrez, Robert L ^a,b   Allison, Kimberly H ^a   Peacock, Sue ^a,b   Lehman, Constance D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b SEATTLE CANCER CARE ALLIANCE   (United States)

Author keywords

Atypical ductal hyperplasia; Biopsy; Breast; Cancer; MRI

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST ATYPICAL DUCTAL HYPERPLASIA; BREAST ATYPICAL LOBULAR HYPERPLASIA; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; CANCER INVASION; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; FISHER EXACT TEST; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; NEEDLE BIOPSY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCAR; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CANCER STAGING; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DIAGNOSTIC USE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TUMOR INVASION;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADODIAMIDE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

EID: 77956804965     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.4081     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:427-437
2. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:8469-8476
3. Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, et al. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 2005; 365:1769-1778 (Pubitemid 40744657)
4. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1295-1303 (Pubitemid 46513295)
5. Lehman CD, Isaacs C, Schnall MD, et al. Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. Radiology 2007; 244:381-388
6. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR 2003; 180:901-910 (Pubitemid 36363023)
7. Liberman L, Morris EA, Kim CM, et al. MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. AJR 2003; 180:333-341 (Pubitemid 36135009)
8. Padhani AR, Hayes C, Assersohn L, et al. Prediction of clinicopathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy at contrast-enhanced MR imaging: initial clinical results. Radiology 2006; 239:361-374
9. Pickles MD, Lowry M, Manton DJ, Gibbs P, Turn-bull LW. Role of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in monitoring early response of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005; 91:1-10
10. Sardanelli F, Podo F, D'Agnolo G, et al. Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. Radiology 2007; 242:698-715
11. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57:75-89 (Pubitemid 46535708)
12. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, et al. MRI detection of distinct incidental cancer in women with primary breast cancer studied in IBMC 6883. J Surg Oncol 2005; 92:32-38
13. Lehman CD, Deperi ER, Peacock S, McDonough MD, DeMartini WB, Shook J. Clinical experience with MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR 2005; 184:1782-1787 (Pubitemid 40770148)
14. Liberman L, Bracero N, Morris E, Thornton C, Dershaw DD. MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial clinical experience. AJR 2005; 185:183-193
15. Orel SG, Rosen M, Mies C, Schnall MD. MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience. Radiology 2006; 238:54-61
16. Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer 2006; 106:982-990
17. Brem RF, Lechner MC, Jackman RJ, et al. Lobular neoplasia at percutaneous breast biopsy: variables associated with carcinoma at surgical excision. AJR 2008; 190:637-641
18. Brenner RJ, Jackman RJ, Parker SH, et al. Percutaneous core needle biopsy of radial scars of the breast: when is excision necessary? AJR 2002; 179:1179-1184
19. Douglas-Jones AG, Denson JL, Cox AC, Harries IB, Stevens G. Radial scar lesions of the breast diagnosed by needle core biopsy: analysis of cases containing occult malignancy. J Clin Pathol 2007; 60:295-298 (Pubitemid 46447746)
20. Jackman RJ, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum- assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision? Radiology 2002; 224: 548-554
21. American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS: magnetic resonance imaging. In: ACR breast imaging reporting and data system, breast imaging atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
22. Wang LC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, Peacock S, Lehman CD. MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions: predictive values of kinetic features measured by computer-aided evaluation. AJR 2009; 193:826-831
23. Eby PR, DeMartini WB, Gutierrez RL, Saini MH, Peacock S, Lehman CD. Characteristics of probably benign breast MRI lesions. AJR 2009; 193:861-867
24. Williams TC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, Peacock S, Lehman CD. Breast MR imaging: computer- aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Radiology 2007; 244:94-103
25. Han BK, Schnall MD, Orel SG, Rosen M. Outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy. AJR 2008; 191:1798-1804
26. Liberman L, Holland AE, Marjan D, et al. Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at MRIguided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR 2007; 188:684-690 (Pubitemid 46303191)
27. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Thornton CM, Van Zee KJ, Tan LK. Fast MRI-guided vacuum- assisted breast biopsy: initial experience. AJR 2003; 181:1283-1293
28. Mahoney MC. Initial clinical experience with a new MRI vacuum-assisted breast biopsy device. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28:900-905
29. Noroozian M, Gombos EC, Chikarmane S, et al. Factors that impact the duration of MRI-guided core needle biopsy. AJR 2010; 194:391; [web] W150-W157
30. Perretta T, Pistolese CA, Bolacchi F, Cossu E, Fiaschetti V, Simonetti G. MR imaging-guided 10-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: histological characterisation. Radiol Med 2008; 113:830-840
31. Eby PR, Ochsner JE, DeMartini WB, Allison KH, Peacock S, Lehman CD. Is surgical excision necessary for focal atypical ductal hyperplasia found at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy? Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15:3232-3238
32. National Cancer Institute Website. SEER statistics 2000-2004. seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975-2004/results-single/sect-04-table.17.pdf. Accessed May 17, 2010
33. Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Tavassoli FA, et al. Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of ductal proliferative breast lesions using standardized criteria. Am J Surg Pathol 1992; 16:1133-1143
34. Adrales G, Turk P, Wallace T, Bird R, Norton HJ, Greene F. Is surgical excision necessary for atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by Mammotome? Am J Surg 2000; 180:313-315
35. Brem RF, Behrndt VS, Sanow L, Gatewood OM. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: histologic underestimation of carcinoma in tissue harvested from impalpable breast lesions using 11-gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. AJR 1999; 172:1405-1407 (Pubitemid 29507645)
36. Burak WE Jr, Owens KE, Tighe MB, et al. Vacuum- assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: histologic underestimation of malignant lesions. Arch Surg 2000; 135:700-703
37. Cangiarella J, Waisman J, Symmans WF, et al. Mammotome core biopsy for mammary microcalcification: analysis of 160 biopsies from 142 women with surgical and radiologic followup. Cancer 2001; 91:173-177
38. Darling ML, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. AJR 2000; 175:1341-1346
39. Lai JT, Burrowes P, MacGregor JH. Diagnostic accuracy of a stereotaxically guided vacuum-assisted large-core breast biopsy program in Canada. Can Assoc Radiol J 2001; 52:223-227
40. Liberman L, Smolkin JH, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Rosen PP. Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 1998; 208: 251-260 (Pubitemid 28323338)
41. Lourenco AP, Mainiero MB, Lazarus E, Giri D, Schepps B. Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of histologic underestimation rates with 11-and 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR 2007; 189:1164; [web]W275-W729
42. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. JAMA 1999; 281:1638-1641
43. Pandelidis S, Heiland D, Jones D, Stough K, Trapeni J, Suliman Y. Accuracy of 11-gauge vacuumassisted core biopsy of mammographic breast lesions. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:43-47
44. Philpotts LE, Lee CH, Horvath LJ, Lange RC, Carter D, Tocino I. Underestimation of breast cancer with II-gauge vacuum suction biopsy. AJR 2000; 175:1047-1050
45. Winchester DJ, Bernstein JR, Jeske JM, et al. Upstaging of atypical ductal hyperplasia after vacuum- assisted 11-gauge stereotactic core needle biopsy. Arch Surg 2003; 138:619-622; discussion 622-613
46. DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Peacock S, Lehman CD. Utility of targeted sonography for breast lesions that were suspicious on MRI. AJR 2009; 192: 1128-1134