Vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: Histologic underestimation of malignant lesions

Archives of Surgery

Volumn 135, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 700-703

  Burak Jr , William E ^a,c   Owens, Kerry E ^a   Tighe, Mary Beth ^a   Kemp, Lisa ^a   Dinges, Susan A ^b   Hitchcock, Charles E ^a   Olsen, John ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b St Rita's Medical Center   (United States)

^c N914 Doan Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; CARCINOMA IN SITU; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY;

EID: 0343963130     PISSN: 00040010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.135.6.700     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology. 1990;154:1191-1195.
2. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, Burke BJ, Hopper KD, Yakes WF. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology. 1991;180: 403-407.
3. Elvecrog EL, Lechner MC, Nelson MT. Nonpalpable breast lesions: correlation of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy and surgical biopsy results. Radiology. 1993;188:453-455.
4. Liberman L, Fahs MC, Dershaw DD, et al. Impact of stereotactic core breast biopsy on cost of diagnosis. Radiology. 1995;195:633-637.
5. Ravdin PM, DeLaurentiis M, Vendely T, Clark GM. Prediction of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients by use of prognostic indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86:1771-1774.
6. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic breast biopsy: improved reliability with 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology. 1997;204:485-488.
7. Jackman RJ, Marzoni FA. Needle-localized breast biopsy: why do we fail? Radiology. 1997;204:677-684.
8. Gisvold JJ, Goellner JR, Grant CS, et al. Breast biopsy: a comparative study of stereotaxically guided core and excisional techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994; 162:815-820.
9. Brenner RJ, Fajardo L, Fisher PR, et al. Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast: effect of operator experience and number of samples on diagnostic accuracy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:341-346.
10. Nguyen M, McCombs MM, Ghandehari S, et al. An update on core needle biopsy for radiologically detected breast lesions. Cancer. 1996;78:2340-2345.
11. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Glassman JR, et al. Analysis of cancers not diagnosed at stereotactic core breast biopsy. Radiology. 1997;203:151-157.
12. Acheson MB, Patton RG, Howisey RL, Lane RF, Morgan A. Histologic correlation of image-guided core biopsy with excisional biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. Arch Surg. 1997;132:815-821.
13. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Large-needle core biopsy: nonmalignant breast abnormalities evaluated with surgical excision or repeat core biopsy. Radiology. 1998;206:717-720.
14. Fuhrman GM, Cederbom GJ, Bolton JS, et al. Image-guided core-needle breast biopsy is an accurate technique to evaluate patients with nonpalpable imaging abnormalities. Ann Surg. 1998;6:932-939.
15. Liberman L, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Hann LE, Rosen PP. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164: 1111-1113.
16. Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of 14-and 11-gauge mammotome probe performance and complication rates. Am Surg. 1997;63:988-95.
17. Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, et al. The sentinel node in breast cancer: a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:941-946.
18. Fornage BD, Toubas O, Morel M. Clinical, mammographic, and sonographic determination of preoperative breast cancer size. Cancer. 1987;60:765-771.