Percutaneous core needle biopsy of radial scars of the breast: When is excision necessary?

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 179, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 1179-1184

  Brenner, R James ^a   Jackman, Roger J ^a   Parker, Steve H ^a   Evans III, W Phill ^a   Philpotts, Liane ^a   Deutch, Beth M ^a   Lechner, Mary C ^a   Lehrer, Daniel ^a   Sylvan, Paul ^a   Hunt, Rebecca ^a   Adler, Steven J ^a   Forcier, Nancy ^a  

^a JOHN WAYNE CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; BREAST TUMOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; EXCISION; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 0036838432     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.179.5.1791179     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adler DD, Helvie MA, Oberman HA, Ikeda DM, Bhan AO. Radial sclerosing lesion of the breast: mammographic features. Radiology 1990;176: 737-740
2. Eusebi V, Grassigli A, Grosso F. Lesioni focali scleroelastotiche mammarie simulanti il carcinoma infiltrante. Pathologica 1976;68:507-518
3. Fisher ER. Palekar AS, Kotwal N, Lipana N. A nonencapsulated sclerosing lesion of the breast. Am J Clin Pathol 1979;71:240-246
4. Rickert RR, Kalisher L, Hutter RVP. Indurative mastopathy: a benign sclerosing lesion of breast with elastosis which may simulate carcinoma. Cancer 1981;47:561-571
5. Page DL. Anderson TJ. Diagnostic histopathology of the breast. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. 1987:9-102
6. Schnitt SJ. Connolly JL. Pathology of benign breast disorders. In: Harris J, Morrow M, Hellman S, eds., Diseases of the breast. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996:34-35
7. Rosen PP. Rosen's breast pathology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven. 1997:76-82
8. Linell F. Ljungberg O, Andersson I. Breast carcinoma: aspects of early stages, progression and related problems. Acta Pathol Micobiol Scand 1980;272[suppl]:1-223
9. Nielsen M, Jensen J, Andersen, JA. An autopsy study of radial scar in the female breast. Histopathology 1985;9:287-295
10. Tabar L, Dean PB. Teaching atlas of mammography. New York: Thieme-Stratton, 1985;85-136
11. Mitnick JS, Vazquez MF, Harris MN, Roses DF. Differentiation of radial scar from scirrhous carcinoma of the breast: mammographic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1989;173:697-700
12. Ciatto S, Morrone D, Catarzi S. et al. Radial scars of the breast: review of 38 consecutive mammographic diagnoses. Radiology 1993;187:757-760
13. Orel SG, Evers K, Yeh I-T. Troupin RH. Radial scar with microcalcifications: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1992;183:479-482
14. Frouge C, Tristant H, Guinebretiere JM, et al. Mammographic lesions suggestive of radial scars: microscopic findings in 40 cases. Radiology 1995;195:623-625
15. Finlay ME, Liston JE, Lunt LG, et al. Assessment of the role of ultrasound in differentiation of radial scars and stellate carcinomas of the breast. Clin Radiol 1994;49:52-55
16. Hassell P. Klein-Parker H. Worth A, Poon P. Radial sclerosing lesions of the breast: mammographic and pathologic correlation. Can Assoc Radiol J 1999;50:370-375
17. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Shepard MJ, Finkelstein SI, Marzoni FA. Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology 1994;193:91-95
18. Brenner RJ. Bassett LW, Fajardo LL, et al. Percutaneous core breast biopsy: a multiinstitutional prospective trial. Radiology 2001;218:866-872
19. Liberman L, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Hann LE, Rosen PR Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy. AJR 1995;164:1111-1113
20. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 3rd ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1998
21. Liberman L, LaTrenta LR. Dershaw DD, et al. Impact of core biopsy on the surgical management of impalpable breast cancer. AJR 1997;168:495-499
22. Lee CH, Egglin TK, Philpotts L, Mainiero MB, Tocino I. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic core needle biopsy: analysis by means of mammographic findings. Radiology 1997;202:849-854
23. Stomper PC, Cholewinski BS, Penetrante RB. Harlos JP, Tsangaris TN. Atypical hyperplasia: frequency and mammographic and pathologic relationships in excisional biopsies guided with mammography and clinical examination. Radiology 1993;189:667-671
24. Vazquez MF, Mitnick JS, Pressman P, et al. Radial scar: cytological evaluation by stereotactic aspiration. Breast Dis 1994;7:299-306
25. Dahlstrom JE, Jain S, Sutton T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic core biopsy in a mammographic breast cancer screening programme. Histopathology 1996;28:421-427
26. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Large-needle core biopsy: nonmalignant breast abnormalities evaluated with surgical excision or repeat core biopsy. Radiology 1998;206:717-720
27. Philpotts LE, Shaheen NA, Carter D, Lange RC, Lee CH. Comparison of rebiopsy rates after stereotactic core needle biopsy of the breast with 11-gauge vacuum suction probe versus 14-gauge needle and automatic gun. AJR 1999;172:683-687
28. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzon FA Jr, Finkelstein SI. Shepard MJ. Stereotactic automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 1999;210:799-805
29. Nielsen M, Christensen I, Andersen J. Radial scars in women with breast cancer. Cancer 1987;59:1019-1025
30. Philpotts LE, Shaheen NA, Jain KS, Carter D, Lee CH. Uncommon high-risk lesions of the breast diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy: clinical importance. Radiology 2000;216: 831-837
31. Jackman RJ, Marzoni FA, Nowels KW. Percutaneous removal of benign mammographic lesions: comparison of automated large-core and directional vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy techniques. AJR 1998;71:1325-1330
32. Berg WA, Krebs TL, Campassi C, Magder LS. Sun CCJ. Evaluation of 14- and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy probes and 14-gauge biopsy guns in a breast parenchymal model. Radiology 1997;205:203-208
33. Sickles EA. Periodic follow-up of probably benign mammographic lesions: results for 3184 consecutive cases. Radiology 1991;179:463-468
34. Varus X. Leborgne F. Leborgne JH. Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography. Radiology 1992:184:409-414
35. Vizcaino I, Gadea L, Andreo L, et al. Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. Radiology 2001;219:475-483
36. Reynolds HE. Core needle biopsy of challenging benign breast conditions: a comprehensive literature review. AJR 2000;174:1245-1250
37. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PR, Abramson AF, Deutsch BM. Stereotaxic 14-gauge breast biopsy: how many core biopsy specimens are needed? Radiology 1994;192:793-795
38. Brenner RJ, Fisher P,Fajardo L, et al. Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast: effect of operator experience and number of samples on diagnostic accuracy. AJR 1996;166:341-346
39. Jacobs TW. Byrne C, Colditz G, Connolly JL. Schnitt SJ. Radial scars in benign breast-biopsy specimens and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1999;340:430-436