Synthesis and characterization of poly(methyl methacrylate)-based experimental bone cements reinforced with TiO2-SrO nanotubes

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 6, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 3178-3186

  Khaled, S M Z ^a   Charpentier, Paul A ^a   Rizkalla, Amin S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Experimental bone cements; In vitro biocompatibility; Mechanical properties; Radiopacity; Strontium titanium nanotube

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE; BONE CEMENT; CELL PROLIFERATION; DISPERSIONS; ENERGY DISPERSIVE SPECTROSCOPY; ESTERS; FRACTURE TOUGHNESS; HIGH RESOLUTION TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; NANOCOMPOSITES; REINFORCEMENT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STRONTIUM COMPOUNDS; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; YARN;

EXPERIMENTAL BONE CEMENT; IN VITRO BIOCOMPATIBILITY; IN-VITRO; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); POLY-METHYL METHACRYLATES; RADIOPACITY; STRONTIUM-TITANIA NANOTUBE; SYNTHESIS AND CHARACTERIZATIONS; TITANIA NANOTUBES; VITRO BIOCOMPATIBILITIES;

NANOTUBES;

ACRYLIC ACID; BIOMATERIAL; BONE CEMENT; METAL OXIDE; METHACRYLIC ACID; METHACRYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; NANOCOMPOSITE; NANOTUBE; OXYGEN; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); SODIUM; STRONTIUM; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; ELEMENT;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISPERSION; FRACTURE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; MORPHOLOGY; OSTEOBLAST; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SPECTROSCOPY; STRENGTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ANIMAL; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECT; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MECHANICAL STRESS; RAT; SPECTROMETRY; SYNTHESIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE; YOUNG MODULUS;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE CEMENTS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; ELASTIC MODULUS; ELEMENTS; NANOTUBES; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; RATS; SPECTROMETRY, X-RAY EMISSION; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; STRESS, MECHANICAL; STRONTIUM; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 77956630962     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.024     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Lewis G. Alternative acrylic bone cement formulations for cemented arthroplasties: present status, key issues, and future prospects. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;84:301-19.
2. Lewis G. Properties of acrylic bone cement: state of the art review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 1997;38:155-82. (Pubitemid 27233104)
3. Lewis G, Bhattaram A. Influence of a pre-blended antibiotic (gentamicin sulfate powder) on various mechanical, thermal, and physical properties of three acrylic bone cements. J Biomater Appl 2006;20:377-408.
4. Dunne N. Mechanical properties of bone cements. In: Sanjukta D, editor. Orthopaedic bone cements. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2008. p. 240-55.
5. Deb S, Abdulghani S, Behiri JC. Radiopacity in bone cements using an organobismuth compound. Biomaterials 2002;23:3387-93.
6. Lewis G. Fatigue testing and performance of acrylic bone-cement materials: state-of-the-art review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2003; 66B: 457-86.
7. Marrs B, Andrews R, Rantell T, Pienkowski D. Augmentation of acrylic bone cement with multiwall carbon nanotubes. J Biomed Mater Res 2006; 77A: 269-76.
8. Burns AWR, Bourne RB. Economics of revision total hip arthroplasty. Curr Orthop 2006;20:203-7.
9. Abboud M, Casaubieilh L, Morvan F, Fontanille M, Duguet E. PMMA-based composite materials with reactive ceramic fillers. IV. Radiopacifying particles embedded in PMMA beads for acrylic bone cements. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2000;53:728-36.
10. Abboud M, Vol S, Duguet E, Fontanille M. PMMA-based composite materials with reactive ceramic fillers. Part III. Radiopacifying particle-reinforced bone cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2000;11:295-300.
11. Lewis G, Xu J, Madigan S, Towler MR. Influence of strontia on various properties of surgical Simplex P acrylic bone cement and experimental variants. Acta Biomater 2007;3:970-9.
12. Guida A, Towler MR, Wall JG, Hill RG, Eramo S. Preliminary work on the antibacterial effect of strontium in glass ionomer cements. J Mater Sci Lett 2003;22:1401-3.
13. Hernandez L, Gurruchaga M, Goni I. Injectable acrylic bone cements for vertebroplasty based on a radiopaque hydroxyapatite. Formulation and rheological behaviour. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2009;20:89-97.
14. Gomoll AH, Fitz W, Scott RD, Thornhill TS, Bellare A. Nanoparticulate fillers improve the mechanical strength of bone cement. Acta Orthop 2008;79:421-7.
15. Goto K, Tamura J, Shinzato S, Fujibayashi S, Hashimoto M, Kawashita M, et al. Bioactive bone cements containing nano-sized titania particles for use as bone substitutes. Biomaterials 2005;26:6496-505.
16. Kotha SP, Lieberman M, Vickers A, Schmid SR, Mason JJ. Adhesion enhancement of steel fibers to acrylic bone cement through a silane coupling agent. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;76:111-9.
17. Ho E, Marcolongo M. Effect of coupling agents on the local mechanical properties of bioactive dental composites by the nano-indentation technique. Dent Mater 2005;21:656-64.
18. 2-PMMA nanocomposite: using methacrylic acid as a coupling agent. Langmuir 2007;23:3988-95.
19. Kasuga T, Hiramatsu M, Hoson A, Sekino T, Niihara K. Titania nanotubes prepared by chemical processing. Adv Mater 1999;11:1307-11.
20. Kasuga T, Hiramatsu M, Hoson A, Sekino T, Niihara K. Formation of titanium oxide nanotube. Langmuir 1998;14:3160-3.
21. 2 nanostructured materials: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv Mater 2006;18:2807-24.
22. Chen Q, Du GH, Zhang S, Peng LM. The structure of trititanate nanotubes. Acta Crystallogr Sect B: Struct Sci 2002;58:587-93.
23. 2. J Mol Catal A Chem 2004;217:203-10.
24. Kim GS, Ansari SG, Seo HK, Kim YS, Shin HS. Effect of annealing temperature on structural and bonded states of titanate nanotube films. J Appl Phys 2007;101:024314-20.
25. Ruse ND, Troczynski T, MacEntee MI, Feduik D. Novel fracture toughness test using a notchless triangular prism (NTP) specimen. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;31:457-63.
26. ASTM. Specification B771-87 (1997). Standard test method for short rod fracture toughness of cemented carbides. In: 2000 Annual Book of ASTM Standards. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials; 2000.
27. Lewis G. Effect of lithotriptor treatment on the fracture toughness of acrylic bone cement. Biomaterials 1991;13:225-30.
28. Khaled SM, Miron RJ, Hamilton DW, Charpentier PA, Rizkalla AS. Reinforcement of resin based cement with titania nanotubes. Dent Mater 2010;26:169-78.
29. Bellows C, Aubin J. Determination of numbers of osteoprogenitors present in isolated fetal rat calvaria cells in vitro. Dev Biol 1989;133:8-13.
30. Schaffer GB, Huo SH, Drennan J, Auchterlonie GJ. The effect of trace elements on the sintering of an Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy. Acta Mater 2001;49:2671-8.
31. Lloyd GE. Atomic number and crystallographic contrast images with the SEM: a review of backscattered electron techniques. Mineral Mag 1987;51:3-19.
32. Garratte-Reed AJ, Bell DC. Energy-dispersive X-ray Analysis in the Electron Microscope. New York: Bios Scientific Publishers; 2003. p 74-82.
33. 2 nanoparticles with improved dispersions. Appl Surf Sci 2009;255:6795-801.
34. 2. J Phys Chem B 2004;108:13706-10.
35. Lennon AB. Fracture toughness and fatigue characteristics of bone cements. In: Sanjukta D, editor. Orthopaedic bone cements. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2008. p. 265-75.
36. Rayson HW, McGrath GC. Fibres, whiskers and flakes for composite applications. In: Clegg DW, Collyer AA, editors. Mechanical properties of reinforced thermoplastics. New York: Elsevier Applied Science; 1986. p. 55-6.
37. Burton RH, Folkes MJ. Fiber-matrix interactions in reinforced thermoplastics. In: Clegg DW, Collyer AA, editors. Mechanical properties of reinforced thermoplastics. New York: Elsevier Applied Science; 1986. p. 269-70.
38. Gojny FH, Wichmann MHG, Kopke U, Fiedler B, Schulte K. Carbon nanotubereinforced epoxy-composites: enhanced stiffness and fracture toughness at low nanotube content. Compos Sci Technol 2004;64:2363-71.
39. Segerström S, Ruyter IE. Effect of thermal cycling on flexural properties of carbon-graphite fiber-reinforced polymers. Dent Mater 2009;25:845-51.
40. Vallo CI, Abraham GA, Cuadrado TR, San Román J. Influence of cross-linked PMMA beads on the mechanical behavior of self-curing acrylic cements. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;70:407-16.
41. Ma R, Sasaki T, Bando Y. Layer-by-layer assembled multilayer films of titanate nanotubes, Ag- or Au-loaded nanotubes, and nanotubes/nanosheets with polycations. J Am Chem Soc 2004;126:10382-8.
42. Johnson AR, Armstrong WD, Singer L. The incorporation and removal of large amounts of strontium by physiologic mechanisms in mineralized tissues. Calcif Tissue Res 1968;2:242-52.
43. Marie PJ, Ammann P, Boivin G, Rey C. Mechanisms of action and therapeutic potential of strontium in bone. Calcif Tissue Int 2001;69:121-9.
44. Xue W, Moore JL, Hosick HL, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A, Lu WW, et al. Osteoprecursor cell response to strontium-containing hydroxyapatite ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;79:804-14.
45. Nielsen SP. The biological role of strontium. Bone 2004;35:583-8.
46. San Roman J, Vazquez Lasa B, Aguilar MR, Boesel LF. Modifications of bone cements. In: Sanjukta D, editor. Orthropaedic bone cements. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2008. p. 332-49.