Adhesion enhancement of steel fibers to acrylic bone cement through a silane coupling agent

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 111-119

  Kotha, S P ^a   Lieberman, M ^b   Vickers, A ^b   Schmid, S R ^c   Mason, J J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^c University of Notre Dame   (United States)

Author keywords

316L stainless steel fibers; Acrylic bone cements; Bonding; Mechanical properties; Silane coupling agent

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONDING; BONE CEMENT; FIBER REINFORCED MATERIALS; FRACTURE TOUGHNESS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; SILANES;

316L STEEL FIBERS; ACRYLIC BONE CEMENT; SILANE COUPLING AGENT;

STAINLESS STEEL;

ACRYLIC CEMENT; METAL; POLYMER; SILANE; STAINLESS STEEL;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMECHANICS; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; LEACHING; NONHUMAN; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SHEAR STRENGTH; TENSILE STRENGTH; YOUNG MODULUS;

ADHESIVENESS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE CEMENTS; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; INDICATORS AND REAGENTS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SILANES; STEEL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 30444447633     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30543     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Lewis G. Properties of acrylic bone cement: state of the art review. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;38(2):155-182.
2. Barden B, Huttegger C. Failure mechanisms in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a morphologic and radiologic study. MaterialWiss Werkst 1999;30(12):746-754.
3. Lennon AB, Prendergast PJ. Residual stress due to curing can initiate damage in porous bone cement: experimental and theoretical evidence. J Biomech 2002;35(3):311-321.
4. Bauer TW, Schils J. The pathology of total joint arthroplasty. II. Mechanisms of implant failure. Skeletal Radiol 1999;28 (9):483-497.
5. Pourdeyhimi B, Wagner HD, Schwartz P. A comparison of mechanical properties of discontinuous Kevlar 29 fiber reinforced bone and dental cements. J Mater Sci 1986;21:4468-4474.
6. Ulcay Y, Agarwal V, Pourdeyhimi B. Elastic properties of 3D randomly distributed spectra 900 and kevlar 49 discontinuous fiber reinforced composites. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Energy Sources Technology Conference and Exhibition, Houston, ASME; 1991. p 41-49.
7. Pourdeyhimi B, Wagner HD. Elastic and ultimate properties of acrylic bone cement reinforced with ultra high molecular-weight polyethylene fibers. J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23:63-80.
8. Friis EA, Kumar B, Cooke FW, Yasuda HK. Fracture toughness of surface-treated carbon fiber reinforced composite bone cement. Fifth World Biomaterials Congress; 1996. p 913.
9. Harper EJ, Behiri JC, Bonfield W. Flexural and fatigue properties of a bone cement based upon polyethylmethacrylate and hydroxyapatite. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1995;6:799-803.
10. Kobayashi M, Nakamura T, Okada Y, Fukumoto A, Furukawa T, Kato H, Kokubo T, Kikutani T. Bioactive bone cement: comparison of apatite and wollastonite containing glass-ceramic, hydroxyapatite, and beta-tricalcium phosphate fillers on bone-bonding strength. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;42(2):223-237.
11. Kim YS, Kang YH, Kim JK, Park JB. The effect of bone mineral particles on the porosity of bone cement. Biomed Mater Eng 1994;4:37-46.
12. Gilbert JL, Net SS, Lauthenschlager EP. Self-reinforced composite poly(methylmethacrylate): static and fatigue properties. Biomaterials 1995;16:1043-1055.
13. Topoleski LDT, Ducheyne P, Cuckler JM. The fracture toughness of titanium-fiber-reinforced bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:1599-1617.
14. Kotha SP, Li C, Schmid SR, Mason JJ. Fracture toughness of steel fiber reinforced bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 2004; 70(3):514-521.
15. Vallo CI. Influence of filler content on static properties of glass-reinforced bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:717-727.
16. Abboud M, Casaubieilh L, Morvan F, Fontanille M, Duguet E. PMMA-based composite materials with reactive ceramic fillers. IV. Radiopacifying particles embedded in PMMA beads for acrylic bone cements. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:728-736.
17. Vila MM, Ginebra MP, Gil FJ, Planell JA. Effect of porosity and environment on the mechanical behavior of acrylic bone cement modified with acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene particles. Part I. Fracture toughness. J Biomed Mater Res Appl Biomater 1999;48:121-127.
18. Kim HY, Yasuda HK. Improvement of fatigue properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement by means of plasma surface treatment of fillers. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;48(2):135-142.
19. Hild DN, Schwartz P. Plasma-treated ultra-high-strength polyethylene fibers improved the fracture-toughness of poly(methyl methacrylate). J Mater Sci Mater Med 1993;4(5):481-493.
20. Ohashi KL, Yerby SA, Dauskardt RH. Effects of an adhesion promoter on the debond resistance of a metal-polymethyl-methacrylate interface. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;54(3):419-427.
21. Harper EJ, Braden M, Bonfield W. Mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite reinforced poly(ethylmethacrylate) bone cement after immersion in physiological solution: influence of a silane coupling agent. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2000;11(8):491-497.
22. Yerby SA, Paal AF, Young PM, Beaupre GS, Ohashi KL, Goodman S. The effect of a silane coupling agent on the bond strength of bone cement and cobalt-chrome alloy. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;49(1):127-133.
23. Plueddemann EP. Silane coupling agents. 2nd ed. New York: Plenum Press; 1991.
24. Shinzato S, Nakamura T, Kokubo T, Kitamura Y. Bioactive bone cement: effect of silane treatment on mechanical properties and osteoconductivity. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;51(3):277-284.
25. D 638-99 standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. In: Annual book of ASTM standards. Section eight: plastics. American Society for Testing and Materials; 2000. p 46-58.
26. Vickers A. Covalently bonding the metal-bone cement interface in orthopedic implants. Master's Thesis, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN; 2002.
27. Kang TH, Ihm K, Hwang CC, Jeon C, Kim KJ, Kim JY, Lee MK, Shin HJ, Kim B, Chung S, Park CY. Direct image observation of the initial forming of passive thin film on stainless steel surface by PEEM. Appl Surf Sci 2003;212:630-635.
28. Topoleski LD, Ducheyne P, Cuckler JM. A fractographic analysis of in vivo poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement failure mechanisms. J Biomed Mater Res 1990;24(2):135-154.
29. Topoleski LD, Ducheyne P, Cuckler JM. The fracture toughness of titanium-fiber-reinforced bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26(12):1599-1617.
30. Zhu YT, Valdez JA, Beyerlein IJ, Zhou SJ, Liu C, Stout MG, Butt DP, Lowe TC. Mechanical properties of bone-shaped-short-fiber reinforced composites. Acta Materialia 1999;47(6):1767-1781.
31. Karaali A, Mirouh K, Hamamda S, Guiraldenq P. Effect of tungsten 0-8 wt.% on the oxidation of Co-Cr alloys. Comput Mater Sci 2005;33(1-3):37-43.
32. Strobl GR. The physics of polymers: concepts for understanding their structures and behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1999.
33. ASTM. E-399-90, Standard method of test for plane strain fracture toughness of metallic materials. In: Annual book of ASTM standards. American Society for Testing and Materials; Vol. 3.01. 1992; p 506.
34. Heida HS. Stiffness optimisation of cement and stem materials in total hip replacement. Biomed Mater Eng 2001;11(1): 1-10.
35. Gross S, Abel EW. A finite element analysis of hollow stemmed hip prostheses as a means of reducing stress shielding of the femur. J Biomech 2001;34(8):995-1003.