Validity, responsibility, and aporia

Qualitative Inquiry

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 603-610

  Koro Ljungberg, Mirka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

aporia; qualitative research; responsibility; validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956531426     PISSN: 10778004     EISSN: 15527565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077800410374034     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Angen, M. (2000). Evaluating interpretive inquiry: Reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 378-395.
2. Brabeck, M., & Brabeck, K. (2009). Feminist perspectives on research ethics. In D. Mertens & P. Ginsberg (Eds.), The handbook of social research ethics (pp. 39-53). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Brydon-Miller, M. (2009). Covenantal ethics and action research: Exploring a common foundation for social research. In D. Mertens & P. Ginsberg (Eds.), The handbook of social research ethics (pp. 243-258). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Cannella, G., & Perez, M. (2009). Power-shifting at the speed of light: Critical qualitative research post-disaster. In N. Denzin & M. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and social justice (pp. 165-183). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
5. Chilisa, B. (2009). Indigenous African-centered ethics: Contesting and complementing dominant models. In D. Mertens & P. Ginsberg (Eds.), The handbook of social research ethics (pp. 407-425). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Cho, J., & Trent, A. (2006). Validity in qualitative research revisited. Qualitative Research, 6, 319-340.
7. Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Denzin, N. (2003). Performance ethnography: Critical pedagogy and the politics of culture. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
9. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). The future of qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1018-1023). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Derrida, J. (1993). Aporias (T. Dutoit, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. Derrida, J. (1995). The gift of death. Religion and postmodernism (D. Wills, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Derrida, J. (1997). Deconstruction in a nutshell. New York: Fordham University Press.
13. Derrida, J. (2005). Paper machine (R. Bowlby, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14. Edgoose, J. (2001). Just decide! Derrida and the ethical aporias of education. In G. Biesta & D. Egea-Kuehne (Eds.), Derrida & education (pp. 119-133). London: Routledge.
15. Eisenhart, M., & Howe, K. (1992). Validity in educational research. In M. LeCompte, W. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 643-680). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16. Evink, E. (2009). (In)finite responsibility: How to avoid the contrary effects of Derrida's ethics. Philosophy Social Criticism, 35, 467-481.
17. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park. CA: Sage.
18. Hatch, A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany: State University of New York Press.
19. Hesse-Biber, S., & Leavy, P. (Eds.). (2004). Approaches to qualitative research: A reader on theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2008). Validity and validation in the making in the context of qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 983-989.
21. Lather, P. (1993). Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism. Sociological Quarterly, 34, 673-693.
22. Lather, P. (2001). Postmodernism, post-structuralism and post (critical) ethnography: Of ruins, aporias and angels. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 477-492). London: Sage.
23. Lather, P. (2006). Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: Teaching research in education as a wild profusion. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(1), 35-57.
24. Lather, P. (2007a). Validity, qualitative. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology (pp. 5161-5165). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
25. Lather, P. (2007b). Getting lost: Feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. Albany: State University of New York Press.
26. LeCompte, M., Millroy, W., & Preissle, J. (Ed.). (1992). The handbook of qualitative research in education. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27. Lincoln, Y. (2009). Ethical practices in qualitative research. In D. Mertens & P. Ginsberg (Eds.), The handbook of social research ethics (pp. 150-169). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
31. Maxwell, J. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 279-300.
32. Maxwell, J. (2010). Validity: How might you be wrong? In W. Luttrell (Ed.), Qualitative educational research: Readings in reflexive methodology and transformative practice (pp. 279-287). New York: Routledge.
33. Mayan, M. (2009). Essentials of qualitative inquiry. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
34. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Mishler, E. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 415-442.
36. Moss, P., Phillips, D., Erickson, F., Floden, R., Lather, P., & Schneider, B. (2009). Learning from our differences: A dialogue across perspectives on quality in educational research. Educational Researcher, 38, 501-517.
37. Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics & moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38. Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Popke, J. (2004). The face of the other: Zapatismo, responsibility and the ethics of deconstruction. Social & Cultural Geography, 5, 301-317.
40. Raffoul, F. (2008). Derrida and the ethics of the im-possible. Research in Phenomenology, 38, 270-290.
41. Scheurich, J. (1997). Research method in the postmodern. London: Falmer.
42. Schram, T. (2003). Conceptualizing qualitative inquiry: Mind-work for fieldwork in education and the social sciences. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
43. Schwandt, T. (1997). Qualitative inquiry: A dictionary of terms. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.
44. Spivak, G. (1997). Translator's preface. In J. Derrida (Ed.), Of Grammatology (Corrected ed., pp. ix-lxxxvii). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
45. Thayer-Bacon, B. (2003). Relational (e)pistemologies. New York: Peter Lang.
46. Todd, S. (2003). Learning from the other: Levinas, psychoanalysis, and ethical possibilities in education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
47. Tong, R. (1993). Feminine and feminist ethics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
48. Trifonas, P. (2003). The ethics of science and/as research: Deconstruction and the orientations of a new academic responsibility. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35, 285-295.
49. Vagle, M. (2009). Validity as intended: Bursting forth toward bridling in phenomenological research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22, 585-605.
50. Wang, H. (2005). Aporias, responsibility, and the im/possibility of teaching multicultural education. Educational Theory, 55(1), 45-59.
51. Watson, C. (2009). Picturing validity: Autoethnography and the representation of self? Qualitative Inquiry, 15, 526-544.
52. Whittemore, R., Chase, S., & Mandle, C. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 522-537.