Personality and experimental psychology: The unification of psychology and the possibility of a paradigm

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 73, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 1224-1237

  Eysenck, Hans J ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031322928     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1224     Document Type: Article

References (131)

1. Aldhous, P. (1992). The promise and pitfalls of molecular genetics. Science, 257, 164-165.
2. Barnes, B. (1982). T. S. Kuhn and social science. London: Macmillan.
3. Barrett, P., & Eysenck, H. (1992). Brain evoked potentials of intelligence: The Hendrickson paradigm. Intelligence, 16, 361-381.
4. Barrett, P., & Eysenck, H. J. (1994). The relationship between evoked potential component amplitude, latency, contour length, variability, zero-crossings, and psychometric intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 3-32.
5. Bates, T., & Eysenck, H. (1993a). Intelligence, inspection-time and decision-time. Intelligence, 17, 523-531.
6. Bates, T., & Eysenck, H. J. (1993b). String length, attention and intelligence: Focussed attention reverses the string length-IQ relationship. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 363-371.
7. Bates, T., Stough, C., Mangan, G., & Pellett, O. (1995). Intelligence and complexity of the averaged evoked potential: An attention theory. Intelligence, 20, 27-39.
8. Benet, V., & Waller, N. (1995). The Big Seven factor model of personality description: Evidence for its cross-cultural generality in a Spanish sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 701-718.
9. Benjamin, J., Li, L., Patterson, C., Greenberg, B., Murphy, D., & Hamer, D. (1996). Populations and familial associations between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of novelty-seeking. Nature and Genetics, 121, 81-84.
10. Ben-Porath, Y., & Waller, N. (1992a). Five big issues in clinical personality assessment: A rejoinder to Costa and McCrae. Psychological Assessment, 4, 23-25.
11. Ben-Porath, Y., & Waller, N. (1992b). "Normal" personality inventories in clinical assessment. General requirements and the potential for using the NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 14-19.
12. Block, J. (1995). A contrary view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-215.
13. Brand, C. (1994). How many dimensions of personality in the "Big Five," the "The Gigantic Three," or the "Competent 6." Psychologica Belgica, 34, 257-274.
14. Brocke, B., Tasche, K., & Beauchard, A. (1997). Biopsychological foundations of extraversion: Differential effort reactivity and state control. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 447-458.
15. Carroll, J. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Cattell, R. B. (1950). Personality: A systematic theoretical and factual study. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1-22.
18. Cattell, R. (1995). The fallacy of five factors in the personality sphere. Psychologist, 28, 207-208.
19. Church, I., & Burke, P. (1994). Exploratory and confirmatory tests of the Big Five and Tellegen's three- and four-dimensional models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 93-114.
20. Cloninger, C. (1986). A unified biosocial theory of personality and its role in the development of anxiety states. Psychiatric Developments, 3, 167-226.
21. Cloninger, C., Adolfsson, R., & Svrakic, N. (1996). Mapping genes for human personality. Nature and Genetics, 12, 3-4.
22. Cloninger, C., Svrakic, D., & Przybeck, T. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of Neural Psychiatry, 50, 975-990.
23. Cohen, M., & Nagel, N. (1936). An introduction to logic and scientific method. New York: Harcourt Brace.
24. Coolidge, P., Becker, L., Di Rito, D., Durham, R., Kinlaw, M., & Philbrick, P. (1994). On the relationship of the five-factor personality model to personality disorders: Four reservations. Psychological Reports, 75, 18-21.
25. Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1991). The revised NEO Personality Inventory. New York: Plenum.
26. Cronbach, L. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671-684.
27. Deary, I., & Caryl, P. (1992). Intelligence, EEG, and evoked potentials. In P. A. Vernon (Ed.), Biological approaches to human intelligence. New Jersey: Ablex.
28. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
29. Draycott, S., & Kline, P. (1995). The Big Three or the Big Five in the EPQ-R vs. the Q-PI: A research note, replication and elaboration. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 801-804.
30. Dreger, R., Lichtenstein, D., & Cattell, R. (1995). Manual for the experimental edition of the Personality Questionnaire for pre-school children. Form A. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 10, 1-50.
31. Eaves, L., Eysenck, H. J., & Martin, N. (1989). Genes, culture and personality. New York: Academic Press.
32. Ebstein, R., Novick, O., Umansky, R., Priel, B., Osher, Y., Blaine, D., Bennett, E., Nemanov, L., Katz, M., & Belmaker, R. (1996). Dopamine D4 receptor (D4Dr) exon III polymorphism association with the human personality trait of novelty seeking. Nature and Genetics, 12, 78-80.
33. Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The scientific study of personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
34. Eysenck, H. J. (1960). The place of theory in psychology. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), Experiments in personality (pp. 305-315). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
35. Eysenck, H. J. (1964). Principles and methods of personality description, classification and diagnosis. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 284-294.
36. Eysenck, H. J. (1965). Smoking, health and personality. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
37. Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
38. Eysenck, H. J. (1973). Personality, learning and "anxiety." In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), Handbook of abnormal psychology (pp. 390-419). San Diego, CA: EDITS.
39. Eysenck, H. J. (1976). The learning theory model of neurosis - a new approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 14, 251-267.
40. Eysenck, H. J. (1977). Crime and personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
41. Eysenck, H. J. (1978). The development of personality and its relation to learning. Melbourne Studies in Education, 154-181.
42. Eysenck, H. J. (1979). The conditioning model of neurosis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 155-199.
43. Eysenck, H. J. (1980a). The bio-social model of man and the unification of psychology. In A. J. Chapman & D. M. Jones (Eds.), Model of man (pp. 49-62). London: British Psychological Society.
44. Eysenck, H. J. (1980b). The bio-social nature of man. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 1, 125-134.
45. Eysenck, H. J. (1981a). General features of the model. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 1-37). New York: Springer-Verlag.
46. Eysenck, H. J. (1981b). A model for personality. New York: Springer-Verlag.
47. Eysenck, H. J. (1983). Drugs as research tools in psychology: Experiments with drugs in personality research. Neuropsychobiology, 10, 29-43.
48. Eysenck, H. J. (1984). The place of individual differences in a scientific psychology. In J. Royce & L. Moos (Eds.), Annals of Theoretical Psychology (pp. 17-114).
49. Eysenck, H. J. (1985). Decline and fall of the Freudian empire. New York: Viking Press.
50. Eysenck, H. J. (1986). The theory of intelligence and the psychopathology of cognition. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in lhe psychology of human intelligence (pp. 1-34). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Eysenck, H. J. (1987). Speed of information processing, reaction time, and the theory of intelligence. In P. A. Vernon (Ed.), Speed of automation and processing and intelligence (pp. 21-68). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Eysenck, H. J. (1990). Biological dimensions of personality. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality, theory and research (pp. 244-276). New York: Guilford Press.
53. Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of personality: 16, 5 or 3? Criteria for a taxonomy paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 773-790.
54. Eysenck, H. J. (1992a). The definition and measurement of psychoticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 757-785.
55. Eysenck, H. J. (1992b). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667-673.
56. Eysenck, H. J. (1992c). Intelligence: The one and the many. In D. K. Detterman (Ed.), Current topics in human intelligence (Vol. 12, pp. 83-116). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
57. Eysenck, H. J. (1992d). A reply to Costa and McCrae: P or A and C - the role of theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 867-868.
58. Eysenck, H. J. (1994). The Big Five or giant three: Criteria for a paradigm. In C. Halverson, G. A. Kohnstamm, & R. P. Martin (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 37-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
59. Eysenck, H. J. (1995a). Can we study intelligence using the experimental method? Intelligence, 20, 217-227.
60. Eysenck, H. J. (1995b). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
61. Eysenck, H. J. (1997). Addiction, personality, and motivation. Human Psychopharmacology, 12, S79-S87.
62. Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). Psychophysiology and the measurement of intelligence. In C. R. Reynolds & V. Willson (Eds.), Methodological and statistical advances in the study of individual differences (pp. 1-49). New York: Plenum Press.
63. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum Press.
64. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1969). Personality structure and measurement. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
65. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1976). Psychoticism as a dimension of personality. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
66. Eysenck, H. J., Granger, G., & Brengelmann, H. (1957). Perceptual processes and mental illness. London: Chapman & Hall.
67. Eysenck, H. J., & Levey, A. (1965). Alternation in choice behaviour and extraversion. Life Sciences, 4, 115-119.
68. Eysenck, H. J., & Levey, A. (1972). Conditioning, introversion-extraversion and the strength of the nervous system. In V. Nebylitsyn & J. Gray (Ed.), Biological basis of individual behaviour (pp. 206-220). New York: Academic Press.
69. Eysenck, H. J., & Schoenthaler, S. (1997). Raising IQ level by vitamin and mineral supplementation. In R. Sternberg & E. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and environment (pp. 363-392). Cambridge, England: C. U. B.
70. Eysenck, H. J., & Wilson, G. D. (Eds.). (1973). The experimental study of Freudian theories. London: Methuen.
71. Gale, A. (1983). Electroencephalographic studies of extraversion-introversion: A case study in the psychophysiology of individual differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 371-380.
72. Garber, J., & Strassberg, Z. (1991). Construct validity: History of application to developmental psychopathology. In W. Grove & D. Ciachetti (Eds.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 219-258). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
73. Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (Eds.). (1989). Handbook of creativity. New York: Plenum Press.
74. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
75. Grawe, K., Donati, R., & Bernauer, P. (1994). Psychotherapie im Wandel. Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
76. Gray, J. (1991). Neural systems of motivation, emotion and affect. In J. Madden (Ed.), Neurobiology of learning: Emotion and affect (pp. 214-233). New York: Raven Press.
77. Gray, J., Feldon, J., Rawlins, J., Hemsley, D., & Smith, A. (1991). The neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 14, 1-84.
78. Gray, N., Pickering, A., & Gray, J. (1994). Psychoticism and dopamine D2 binding in the basal ganglia using single photon emission tomography. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 431-434.
79. Gustafsson, J. (1984). A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilities. Intelligence, 8, 179-203.
80. Haier, R. (1993). Cerebral glucose metabolism and intelligence. In P. A. Vernon (Ed.), Biological approaches to the study of human intelligence (pp. 317-333). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
81. Hall, C., & Lindsey, G. (1957). Theories of personality. London: Wiley.
82. Hendrickson, D. E., & Hendrickson, A. E. (1982). The biological basis of intelligence. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model for intellegence. New York: Springer Verlag.
83. Horn, J. (1985). Remodeling old models of intelligence. In B. Walman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 267-300). New York: Wiley.
84. Hough, L. (1992). The "Big Five" personality variables - Construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139-155.
85. Howarth, E., & Eysenck, H. J. (1968). Extraversion, arousal, and paired-associate recall. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 3, 114-116.
86. Hull, C. (1951). Essentials of behaviour. New York: Yale University Press.
87. Jackson, D., Paunonen, S., Fraboni, M., & Goffin, R. (1996). A five-factor versus six-factor model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 33-45.
88. John, O. P. (1990). The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality on the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality (pp. 66-100). New York: Guilford Press.
89. Jones, J., Eysenck, H. J., Martin, I., & Levey, A. (1981). Personality and the topography of the conditioned eye-lid response. Personality and Individual Differences, 2, 61-83.
90. Jones, M. B., & Fennell, R. S. (1965). Runaway performance by two strains of rat. Quarterly Journal of Florida Academy of Science, 28, 289-296.
91. Joseph, M., Young, A., & Gray, J. (in press). Are neurochemistry and reinforcement enough - Can the abuse potential of drugs be explained by common actions on a dopamine reward system with the brain? Human Psychophysiology, 11, 555-563.
92. Kleinsmith, L., & Kaplan, S. (1963). Paired associate learning as a function of arousal and interpolated interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 190-193.
93. Kleinsmith, L., & Kaplan, S. (1964). Interaction of arousal and recall interval in nonsense syllable and paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 124-126.
94. Kline, P. (1981). Fact and fantasy in Freudian theory (2nd ed.). London: Methuen.
95. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
96. Kuhn, T. (1974). Second thoughts in paradigms. In F. Suppe (Ed.), The structure of scientific theories (pp. 459-482). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
97. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification of the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 19-129). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
98. Laudon, L. (1977). Progress and its problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.
99. Leith, G. O. (1974). Individual differences in learning interactions of personality and teaching methods. In Proceedings of Personality and Academic Progress (pp. 14-25). London: Association of Educational Psychologists.
100. Magnusson, D., & Endler, N. S. (Eds.). (1977). Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
101. Martin, I., & Levey, A. (1968). The genius of the classical conditioned response. Oxford, England: Pergamon.
102. Matthews, G., & Oddy, K. (1993). Recovery of major personality dimensions from trait adjective data. Personality and individual differences, 15, 419-431.
103. McAdams, D. (1992). The five-factor model in personality: A critical appraisal. Journal of Personality, 60, 329-361.
104. McGuffin, P., Owen, M., & Gill, M. (1992). Molecular genetics of schizophrenia. In J. Mendlewicz & H. Hippius (Eds.), Genetic research in psychiatry (pp. 25-48). New York: Springer-Verlag.
105. Meehl, P. (1962). Schizophrenia, schizotypy, schizophrenia. American Psychologist, 17, 827-838.
106. Mershon, B., & Gorsuch, R. (1988). Number of factors in the personality sphere: Does increase in factors increase predictability of real-life criteria? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 675-680.
107. Miller, D. (1994). Intelligence and brain myelination: A hypothesis. Personality and individual differences, 17, 803-832.
108. Pervin, L. (Ed.). (1990). Handbook of personality. New York: Guilford Press.
109. Plomin, R. (1993). Nature and nurture: Perspective and prospective. In R. Plomin & G. McClearn (Eds.), Nature, nurture and psychology (pp. 459-485). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
110. Poincare, J. H. (1902). La science et l'hypothese. Paris: Flammarian.
111. Putnam, H. (1974). Scientific explanation. In F. Suppe (Ed.), The structure of scientific theories (pp. 424-433). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
112. Raine, A., Venables, P., & Williams, M. (1996). Better autonomic conditioning and faster electrodermal half-recovery time at age 15 years as possible protective factors against crime at age 29 years. Developmental Psychology, 32, 624-630.
113. Ravensdorf, D. (1978). Vom unsinnigen Aufwand. Archiv fuer Psychologie, 130, 2-36.
114. Reed, W., Ayersman, D., & Liu, M. (Eds.). (1995). Hypermedia: Theory research and application [Special issue]. Computers in Human Behaviour, 11, 373-687.
115. Schafer, E. (1985). Neural adaptability: A biological determinant of g factor intelligence. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 8, 264-270.
116. Shigehisa, P., Shigehisa, T., & Symons, J. (1973). Effects of intensity of auditory stimulation on photopic visual sensitivity in relation to personality. Japanese Psychological Research, 15, 164-172.
117. Shigehisa, T., & Symons, J. (1973). Effects of intensity of visual stimulation on auditory sensitivity in relation to personality. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 205-213.
118. Snow, D., Kyllonen, P., & Marshalek, B. (1984). The topography of ability and learning correlations. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 47-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
119. Sokal, R., & Sneath, H. (1963). Principles of numerical taxonomy. London: Freeman.
120. Spence, K., & Beecroft, R. (1954). Differential conditioning and level of anxiety. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 399-403.
121. Spence, K., & Parker, I. (1954). The relation of anxiety to differential eyelid conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 127-134.
122. Spence, J. T., & Spence, K. W. (1966). The motivational components of manifest anxiety: Drive and drive stimuli. In C. Spielberger (Ed.), Anxiety and behaviour (pp. 119-134). New York: Academic Press.
123. Stelmack, R. (1981). The psychopathology of extraversion and neuroticism. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 38-64). New York: Springer-Verlag.
124. Suppe, F. (1974). Exemplars, theories and disciplinary matrices. In F. Suppe (Ed.), The structure of scientific theories (pp. 483-499). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
125. Tellegen, A. (1993). False concepts and psychological concepts of personality and personality disorder. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 122-130.
126. Urbantschitsch, V. (1883). Uber den Einfluss von Trigeminus - Raizen auf fie Sinnsempfindungen insbesondere auf dem Gesichtsinn. Archiv fur die Gesemte Physiologie, 30, 129-175.
127. Van Heck, G. L., Perugini, M., Caprara, G. V., & Froger, J. (1994). The Big Five as tendencies in situations. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 715-731.
128. Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation. Journal of Comparative and Neurological Biology, 18, 459-482.
129. Zuckerman, M. (1991). Psychobiology of personality. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
130. Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D., & Camac, C. (1988). What lies beyond E and N? Factor analyses of scales believed to measure basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 96-107.
131. Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D., Joireman, J., Tefa, P., & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 757-768.