Comparing the reliability of five participation instruments in persons with spinal conditions

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 735-743

  Noonan, Vanessa K ^a   Kopec, Jacek A ^a,b   Noreau, Luc ^c,d   Singer, Joel ^a   Masse, Louise C ^a   Dvorak, Marcel F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b ARTHRITIS RESEARCH CENTRE OF CANADA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^d CENTER FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH IN REHABILITATION AND SOCIAL INTEGRATION   (Canada)

Author keywords

Consumer participation; Questionnaires; Rehabilitation; Reproducibility of results; World health organization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; DISABLED PERSON; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF CONCEPT; SPINAL CORD INJURY; SPINE DISEASE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF CONCEPT; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; SPINAL DISEASES;

EID: 77956408943     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0583     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2001.
2. Noonan VK, Kopec JA, Noreau L, Singer J, Dvorak MF. A review of participation instruments based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disabil Rehabil 2009; 31: 1883-1901.
3. Dekker J, Dallmeijer AJ, Lankhorst GJ. Clinimetrics in rehabilitation medicine: current issues in developing and applying measurement instruments. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 193-201.
4. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patientbased outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1998; 2: 1-74.
5. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 2002; 11: 193-205.
6. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 34-42.
7. Posl M. Evaluation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule Il (WHODAS II) - German Version [dissertation]. Ludwig Maximilian University: Munich (Germany); 2004.
8. Wilkie R, Peat G, Thomas E, Hooper H, Croft PR. The Keele Assessment of Participation: a new instrument to measure participation restriction in population studies. Combined qualitative and quantitative examination of its psychometric properties. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 1889-1899.
9. Beckerman H, Roebroeck ME, Lankhorst GJ, Becher JG, Bezemer PD, Verbeek AL. Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res 2001; 10: 571-578.
10. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 1033-1039.
11. Cassidy JD, Cote P, Carroll LJ, Kristman V Incidence and course of low back pain episodes in the general population. Spine 2005; 30:2817-2823.
12. Katz JN. Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 Suppl 2:21-24.
13. Lund ML, Nordlund A, Nygard L, Lexell J, Bernspang B. Perceptions of participation and predictors of perceived problems with participation in persons with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 3-8.
14. Kannus P, Niemi S, Palvanen M, Parkkari J. Continuously increasing number and incidence of fall-induced, fracture-associated, spinal cord injuries in elderly persons. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 2145-2149.
15. Tinetti ME, Baker DI, McAvay G, Claus EB, Garrett P, Gottschalk M, et al. A multifactorial intervention to reduce the risk of falling among elderly people living in the community. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 821-827.
16. Cardol M, de Haan RJ, de Jong BA, van den Bos GA, de Groot IJ. Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 210-216.
17. Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Jette AM, Ware JE, Jr. Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the Participation Measure for Post-Acute Care (PM-PAC). Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 86: 57-71.
18. Brown M, Dijkers MP, Gordon WA, Ashman T, Charatz H, Cheng Z. Participation objective, Participation subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004; 19: 459-481.
19. World Health Organization. Geneva: WHODAS II [updated 2001, November 27; cited 2006 March 10]. Available from: http://www.who.int/icidh/whodas.
20. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.
21. Marino RJ, Barros T, Biering-Sorensen F, Bums SP, Donovan WH, Graves DE, et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2003; 26 Suppl 1:S50-S56.
22. Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossei AH, Katz JN. The SelfAdministered Comorbidity Questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 49: 156-163.
23. Dijkers M. Comments on van Brakel et al.'s Participation Scale. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 1360-1362.
24. Gray DB, Hollingsworth HH, Stark SL, Morgan KA. Participation Survey/Mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 189-197.
25. van Brakel WH, Anderson AM, Mutatkar RK, Bakirtzief Z, Nicholls PG, Raju MS, et al. The Participation Scale: measuring a key concept in public health. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 193-203.
26. Ostir GV, Granger CV, Black T, Roberts P, Burgos L, Martinkewiz P, et al. Preliminary results for the PAR-PRO: a measure of home and community participation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 1043-1051.
27. Haley SM, Gandek B, Siebens H, Black-Schaffer RM, Sinclair SJ, Tao W, et al. Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 275-283.
28. Sandstrom M, Lundin-Olsson L. Development and evaluation of a new questionnaire for rating perceived participation. Clin Rehabil 2007; 21:833-845.
29. Pallant JF, Misajon R, Bennett E, Manderson L. Measuring the impact and distress of health problems from the individual's perspective: development of the Perceived Impact of Problem Profile (PIPP). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4: 36.
30. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: assessment, analysis and interpretation. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 2000.
31. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135-160.
32. Franchignoni F, Ferriero G, Giordano A, Guglielmi V, Picco D. Rasch psychometric validation of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire in people with Parkinson's disease. Eura Medicophys 2007; 43: 451-461.
33. Lund ML, Fisher AG, Lexell J, Bernspang B. Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire: internal scale validity of the Swedish version for use in people with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med 2007; 39: 156-162.
34. Middelkamp W, Moulaert VR, Verbunt JA, van Heugten CM, Bakx WG, Wade DT. Life after survival: long-term daily life functioning and quality of life of patients with hypoxic brain injury as a result of a cardiac arrest. Clin Rehabil 2007; 21: 425-431.
35. Sibley A, Kersten P, Ward CD, White B, Mehta R, George S. Measuring autonomy in disabled people: Validation of a new scale in a UK population. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 793-803.
36. van Genderen FR, van Meeteren NL, Heijnen L, van den Berg HM, Helders PJ. The use of a disability model in haemophilia research. Haemophilia 2005; 11: 472-480.
37. Dijkers MP, Whiteneck G, El Jaroudi R. Measures of social outcomes in disability research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: S63-S80.
38. Chisolm TH, Abrams HB, McArdle R, Wilson RH, Doyle PJ. The WHO-DAS II: psychometric properties in the measurement of functional health status in adults with acquired hearing loss. Trends Amplif 2005; 9: 111-126.
39. McKibbin C, Patterson TL, Jeste DV. Assessing disability in older patients with schizophrenia: results from the WHODAS-II. J Nerv Ment Dis 2004; 192: 405-413.
40. de Boer MR, de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Moll AC, Volker-Dieben HJ, van Rens GH. Changes to the subscales of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires are proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58: 1260-1268.
41. de Vet HC, Bouter LM, Bezemer PD, Beurskens AJ. Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures. Theoretical considerations illustrated by an empirical example. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2001; 17: 479-487.