Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the Participation Measure for Post-Acute Care (PM-PAC)

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 57-71

  Gandek, Barbara ^a,b   Sinclair, Samuel J ^a   Jette, Alan M ^c   Ware Jr , John E ^a,b,d  

^a Health Assessment Lab   (United States)

^b TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d QualityMetric Incorporated   (United States)

Author keywords

Outcomes Assessment; Questionnaires; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMMUNITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ECONOMIC ASPECT; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARTICIPATION MEASURE FOR POST ACUTE CARE; PATIENT MOBILITY; PSYCHOMETRY; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SELF CARE; SELF REPORT; SOCIAL LIFE; VALIDITY; WORK;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COMMUNICATION; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; INTERVIEWS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; SUBACUTE CARE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33847690720     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.phm.0000233200.43822.21     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Whyte J: Toward a methodology for rehabilitation research. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994;73:428-35
2. World Health Organization: International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2001
3. Üstün TB, Chatterji S, Bickenbach J, et al: The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: A new tool for understanding disability and health. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:565-71
4. Jette A, Haley S, Kooyoomjian J: Are the ICF Activity and Participation dimensions distinct? J Rehabil Med 2003;35:145-9
5. Whiteneck G, Charlifue S, Gerhart K, et al: Quantifying handicap: A new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:519-26
6. Willer B, Ottenbacher KJ, Coad ML: The Community Integration Questionnaire: A comparative examination. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994;73:103-11
7. Dijkers MPJM, Whiteneck G, El-Jaroudi R: Measures of social outcomes in disability research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81 (suppl 2):S63-80
8. Holman R, Glas CAW, Lindeboom R, et al: Practical methods for dealing with "not applicable" item responses in the AMC Linear Disability Score project. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004;2:29
9. Embretson SE, Reise SP: Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000
10. Haley S, Coster W, Andres P, et al: Activity outcome measurement for postacute care. Med Care 2004;42 (suppl 1):I49-61
11. World Health Organization. ICIDH-2: International Classi-fication of Functioning and Disability. Beta-2 Draft, Full Version. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1999
12. McDowell I, Newell C: Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. New York, Oxford University Press, 1996
13. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al: SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, The Health Institute, 1993
14. National Organization on Disability: 2000 N.O.D./Harris Survey of Americans with Disabilities. New York, Harris Interactive, 2000
15. van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, et al: Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988;19:604-7
16. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE, et al: A Manual for Users of the SF-8 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI, QualityMetric Incorporated, 2001
17. Ware JE, Gandek B: Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: The IQOLA Project approach. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:945-52
18. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH: Psychometric Theory, ed 3. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1994
19. Muthen BO, Muthen L: MPlus User's Guide. Los Angeles, Muthen and Muthen, 1998
20. Bollen KA, Barb KH: Pearson's r and coarsely categorized measures. Am Sociol Rev 1981;46:232-9
21. Bjorner JB, Kosinski M, Ware JE: Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: An application of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HIT). Qual Life Res 2003;12:913-33
22. Hu L, Bentler PM: Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Modeling 1999;6:1-55
23. Ramsay JO: Kernel smoothing approaches to nonparametric item characteristic curve estimation. Psychometrika 1991;56:611-30
24. Bjorner JB, Kosinski M, Ware JE: The feasibility of applying item response theory to measures of migraine impact: A re-analysis of three clinical studies. Qual Life Res 2003;12:887-902
25. Ramsay JO: TestGraf: A Program for the Graphical Analysis of Multiple Choice Test and Questionnaire Data. Montreal, McGill University, 1995
26. Muraki E: A generalized partial credit model, in van der Linden WJ, Hambleton RK (eds): Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. Berlin, Springer, 1997, pp 153-64
27. Bock RD, Aitkin M: Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika 1981;46:443-59
28. Muraki E, Bock RD: Parscale: IRT Based Test Scoring and Item Analysis for Graded Open-Ended Exercises and Performance Tasks. Chicago, Scientific Software, 1996
29. Orlando M, Thissen D: Likelihood-based item-fit indices for dichotomous item response theory models. Appl Psychol Meas 2000;24:50-64
30. Bjorner JB, Christensen CB, Orlando M, et al: Testing the fit of item response theory models for patient reported outcomes (abstract). Qual Life Res 2005;14:2079
31. Bock RD, Mislevy RJ: Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment. Appl Psychol Meas 1982;6:431-44
32. Harman HH: Modern Factor Analysis, ed 3, revised. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1976
33. Perenboom RJM, Chorus AMJ: Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:577-87
34. Whiteneck G: Measuring what matters: Key rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:1073-6
35. Jette AM, Keysor JJ, Coster WJ, et al: Beyond function: Predicting participation outcomes in a rehabilitation cohort. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:2087-94
36. Ware JE: Conceptualization and measurement of health-related quality of life: Comments on an evolving field. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84 (4 suppl 2):S43-51