Psychometric properties of the impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 210-216

  Cardol, Mieke ^a   De Haan, Rob J ^a   De Jong, Bareld A ^a   Van den Bos, Geertrudis A M ^a   De Groot, Imelda J M ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Assessment; Disability evaluation; Netherlands; Patient outcome; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EDUCATION; FAMILY; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION PROCESS; WORK;

EID: 0035128688     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2001.18218     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Handicap questionnaires: What do they assess?
2. The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: The Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPAQ)
3. The development of a short generic version of the Sickness Impact Profile
4. The SIP68: A measure of health-related functional status in rehabilitation medicine
5. Measuring handicap: The London Handicap Scale, a new measure for chronic disease
6. Handicap one year after stroke: Validity of a new scale
7. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests
8. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales
9. Bias, prevalence and kappa
10. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes
11. High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes
12. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability
13. A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement
14. Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: An illustration of appropriate statistical analyses
15. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater ability
16. The orthogonal rotation of factors in clinical research: A critical note
17. A methodological framework for assessing health indices
18. Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: A clarification
19. Evaluating the efficacy of medical treatment: Possibilities and limitations
20. Generic health status measures are unsuitable for measuring health status in severely disabled people
21. The value of data on disability in surveys