The use of a disability model in haemophilia research

Haemophilia

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 472-480

  van Genderen, Frank R ^a,b   van Meeteren, N L U ^b,c   Heijnen, L ^a,d   van den Berg, H M ^a   Helders, P J M ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c Academy of Health Sciences Utrecht   (Netherlands)

^d Rehabilitation Centre De Trappenberg   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Disablement process; Dutch AIMS2; Haemophilia; HAL; Questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTHROPATHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE MODEL; DISEASE SEVERITY; FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; HEMOPHILIA; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MENTAL HEALTH; PAIN; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PHYSICAL DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DISABILITY EVALUATION; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HEMARTHROSIS; HEMOPHILIA A; HEMOPHILIA B; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PAIN; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 24644519351     PISSN: 13518216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2005.01135.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 628-34.
2. Stucki G, Sigl T. Assessment of the impact of disease on the individual. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2003; 17: 451-73.
3. Pope, AM, Tarlov, AR. Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1991.
4. Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 1-14.
5. Jette AM, Keysor JJ. Disability models: implications for arthritis exercise and physical activity interventions. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 49: 114-20.
6. Escalante A, Del Rincon I. The disablement process in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 47: 333-42.
7. Escalante A, Del Rincon I. How much disability in rheumatoid arthritis is explained by rheumatoid arthritis? Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 1712-21.
8. Hazes JM. Determinants of physical function in rheumatoid arthritis: association with the disease process. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003; 42 (Suppl. 2): ii17-21.
9. Weigl M, Cieza A, Harder M et al. Linking osteoarthritis-specific health-status measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003; 11: 519-23.
10. Kempen GIJM, Van Heuvelen MJG, Van Sonderen E et al. The relationship of functional limitations to disability and the moderating effects of psychological attributes in community-dwelling older persons. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 1161-72.
11. Hermann KM, Reese CS. Relationships among selected measures of impairments, functional limitations, and disability in patients with cervical spine disorders. Phys Ther 2001; 81: 903-14.
12. Jette DU, Manago D, Medved E et al. The disablement process in patients with pulmonary disease. Phys Ther 1997; 77: 385-94.
13. Schoenmakers MAGC, Gulmans VA, Helders PJ, Van den Berg HM. Motor performance and disability in Dutch children with haemophilia: a comparison with their healthy peers. Haemophilia 2001; 7: 293-8.
14. Van Genderen FR, Van Meeteren NLU, Van der Bom JG et al. Functional consequences of haemophilia in adults: the development of the Haemophilia Activities List. Haemophilia 2004; 10: 565-71.
15. De Joode EW, Van Meeteren NLU, Van den Berg HM, De Kleijn P, Helders PJM. Validity of health status measurement with the Dutch Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale 2 in individuals with severe haemophilia. Haemophilia 2001; 7: 190-7.
16. Van Meeteren NLU, Strato IHM, Van Veldhoven NHMJ et al. The utility of the Dutch Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale 2 for assessing health status in individuals with haemophilia: a pilot study. Haemophilia 2000; 6: 664-71.
17. Cardol M, De Haan RJ, De Jong BA, Van den Bos GA, De Groot IJM. Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 210-6.
18. Cardol M, Beelen A, Van den Bos GA et al. Responsiveness of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 1524-9.
19. Cardol M, De Haan RJ, Van den Bos GA, De Jong BA, De Groot IJM. The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA). Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 411-9.
20. Cardol M, De Jong BA, Van den Bos GA et al. Beyond disability: perceived participation in people with a chronic disabling condition. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 27-35.
21. Pettersson H, Nilsson IM, Hedner U, Norehn K, Ahlberg A. Radiologic evaluation of prophylaxis in severe haemophilia. Acta Paediatr Scand 1981; 70: 565-70.
22. Riemsma RP, Taal E, Rasker JJ et al. Evaluation of a Dutch version of the AIMS2 for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1996; 35: 755-60.
23. Merkies ISJ, Schmitz PIM, Van der Meche FGA, Samijn JPA, Van Doorn PA. Connecting impairment, disability, and handicap in immune mediated polyneuropathies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74: 99-104.
24. Jette AM, Assmann SF, Rooks D, Harris BA, Crawford S. Interrelationships among disablement concepts. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1998; 53: M395-404.
25. Choiniere M, Melzack R. Acute and chronic pain in hemophilia. Pain 1987; 31: 317-31.
26. Aznar JA, Magallón M, Querol F, Gorina E, Tusell JM. The orthopaedic status of severe haemophiliacs in Spain. Haemophilia 2000; 6: 170-6.
27. Wallny T, Lahaye L, Brackmann HH et al. Clinical and radiographic scores in haemophilic arthropathies: how well do these correlate to subjective pain status and daily activities? Haemophilia 2002; 8: 802-8.
28. Triemstra AHM, Van der Ploeg HM, Smit C et al. Well-being of haemophilia patients: a model for direct and indirect effects of medical parameters on the physical and psychosocial functioning. Soc Sci Med 1998; 47: 581-93.
29. Fischer K, Van der Bom JG, Mauser-Bunschoten EP et al. Changes in treatment strategies for severe haemophilia over the last 3 decades: effects on clotting factor consumption and arthropathy. Haemophilia 2001; 7: 446-52.
30. Fischer K, Van Hout BA, Van der Bom JG, Grobbee DE, Van den Berg HM. Association between joint bleeds and Pettersson scores in severe haemophilia. Acta Radiol 2002; 43: 528-32.
31. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986; 51: 1173-82.
32. Vlaeyen JW, Morley S. Cognitive-behavioral treatments for chronic pain: what works for whom? Clin J Pain 2005; 21: 1-8.
33. Wallny T, Hess L, Seuser A et al. Pain status of patients with severe haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2001; 7: 453-8.
34. Hidding A, Van Santen M, De Klerk E et al. Comparison between self-report measures and clinical observations of functional disability in ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 1994; 21: 818-23.
35. De Kleijn P, Van Genderen FR, Van Meeteren NLU. Assessing functional health status in adults with haemophilia: towards a preliminary core set of clinimetric instruments based on a literature search in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Haemophilia 2005; 11: 308-18.
36. World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disability, and Handicaps (ICIDH). Geneva: World Health Organization, 1980.
37. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.
38. De Kleijn P, Heijnen L, Van Meeteren NLU. Clinimetric instruments to assess functional health status in patients with haemophilia: a literature review. Haemophilia 2002; 8: 419-27.