Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 193-205

  Lohr, Kathleen N ^a  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Health status; Item response theory; Measurement; Quality of life; Reliability; Responsiveness; Validity

Indexed keywords

HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW;

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0036112505     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1015291021312     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement
2. The Danish SF-36 health survey: Translation and preliminary validity studies
3. Differential item functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36
4. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests
5. Health outcomes methodology symposium. Summary and recommendations
6. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: Are available health surveys adequate?
7. Health outcomes methodology symposium
8. Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance