Have we missed something? Identifying missing types of research in computing education

ICER'10 - Proceedings of the International Computing Education Research Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 13-21

  Kinnunen, Päivi ^a   Meisalo, Veijo ^b   Malmi, Lauri ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Classification criteria; Computing education research; Didactic focus; Didactic triangle; Literature

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA; COMPUTING EDUCATION; DIDACTIC FOCUS; DIDACTIC TRIANGLE; LITERATURE;

EDUCATION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

RESEARCH;

EID: 77956277251     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1839594.1839598     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Niss, M., Aspects of the Nature and State of Research in Mathematics Education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1999. 40(1): p. 1-24s.
2. Hostetler, K., What Is "Good" Education Research? Educational Researcher, 2005. 34(6): p. 16-21.
3. Tight, M., Higher education research as tribe, territory and/or community: a co-citation analysis. Higher Education, 2008. 55(5): p. 593-605.
4. Clancy, M., et al., Models and Areas for CS Education Research. Computer Science Education, 2001. 11(4): p. 323-341.
5. Fincher, S. and M. Petre, Computer Science Education Research. 2004, London: Taylor & Francis.
6. Pears, A., et al., Constructing a Core Literature for Computing Education Research. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 2005. 37(4): p. 152-161.
7. Pears, A., et al., A survey of literature on the teaching of introductory programming, in Working group reports on ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education. 2007, ACM: Dundee, Scotland.
8. Valentine, D., CS educational research: a meta-analysis of SIGCSE technical symposium proceedings. Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 2004. 35(1): p. 255-259.
9. Simon, A Classification of Recent Australasian Computing Education Publications. Computer Science Education, 2007. 17(3): p. 155-169.
10. Simon, et al., Classifying computing education papers: process and results, in Proceeding of the fourth international workshop on Computing education research. 2008, ACM: Sydney, Australia.
11. Sheard, J., et al., Analysis of research into the teaching and learning of programming, in Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on Computing education research workshop. 2009, ACM: Berkeley, CA, USA.
12. Glass, R., L., V. Ramesh, and I. Vessey, An analysis of research in computing disciplines. Commun. ACM, 2004. 47(6): p. 89-94.
13. Randolph, J., et al., A methodological review of computer science education research. Journal of Information Technology Education, 2008. 7: p. 135-162.
14. Joy, M., et al., Categorising computer science education research. Education and Information Technologies, 2009. 14(2): p. 105-126.
15. Peterssen, W.H., Lehrbuch Allgemeine Didaktik. 1989, Munchen: Ehrenwirth.
16. Kansanen, P., Studying-the Realistic Bridge Between Instruction and Learning. An Attempt to a Conceptual Whole of the Teaching-Studying-Learning Process. Educational Studies, 2003. 29(2/3): p. 221-232.
17. Künzli, R., German Didaktik: Models of Re-presentation, of Intercourse, and of Experience, in Teaching as a reflective practice : : the German Didaktik tradition, I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, and K. Riquarts, Editors. 2000, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ :.
18. Friesen, N. Microlearning and (Micro)Didaktik. in Micromedia & e-Learning 2.0: Gaining the Big Picture. Proceedings of Microlearning Conference 2006. 2006. Innsbruck: Innsbruck UP.
19. Bergamin, P., Blended Learning: Die wiedergefundene Gemainschaft. Konzeptionelle Betrachtungen zur Umsetzung von Lernszenarien im Fernstudium auf Hochschlstufe. 2006, IFeL - Institut für Fernstudien-and eLearningforscung.
20. Kansanen, P. and M. Meri, The didactic relation in the teachingstudying-learning process. TNTEE Publications, 1999. 2(1): p. 107-116.
21. Kinnunen, P. Challenges of teaching and studying programming at a university of technology - Viewpoints of students, teachers and the university. Doctoral dissertation, TKK Research Reports in Computer Science and Engineering A, TKK-CSEA4/09, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology, 2009.
22. Ihantola, P., et al., Taxonomy of effortless creation of algorithm visualizations, in Proceedings of the first international workshop on Computing education research. 2005, ACM: Seattle, WA, USA.
23. Bennedsen, J. and M. Caspersen, E., Abstraction ability as an indicator of success for learning computing science?, in Proceeding of the fourth international workshop on Computingeducation research. 2008, ACM: Sydney, Australia.
24. Fincher, S. and J. Tenenberg, Warren's question, in Proceedings of the third international workshop on Computing education research. 2007, ACM: Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
25. Crenshaw, T., L., E.W. Chambers, and H. Metcalf, A case study of retention practices at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. SIGCSE Bull., 2008. 40(1): p. 412-416.
26. Sajaniemi, J., M. Kuittinen, and T. Tikansalo, A study of the development of students' visualizations of program state during an elementary object-oriented programming course, in Proceedings of the third international workshop on Computing education research. 2007, ACM: Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
27. Dorn, B. and M. Guzdial, Graphic designers who program as informal computer science learners, in Proceedings of the second international workshop on Computing education research. 2006, ACM: Canterbury, United Kingdom.
28. Venables, A., G. Tan, and R. Lister, A closer look at tracing, explaining and code writing skills in the novice programmer, in Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on Computing education research workshop. 2009, ACM: Berkeley, CA, USA.
29. Schulte, C. and J. Bennedsen, What do teachers teach in introductory programming?, in Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Computing education research. 2006, ACM: Canterbury, United Kingdom.
30. Haberman, B., E. Lev, and D. Langley, Action research as a tool for promoting teacher awareness of students' conceptual understanding. SIGCSE Bull., 2003. 35(3): p. 144-148.
31. Caspersen, M., E. and J. Bennedsen, Instructional design of a programming course: a learning theoretic approach, in Proceedings of the third international workshop on Computing education research. 2007, ACM: Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
32. Kaczmarczyk, L., C., M. Boutell, R., and M. Last, Z., Challenging the advanced first-year student's learning process through student presentations, in Proceedings of the third international workshop on Computing education research. 2007, ACM: Atlanta, Georgia, USA.