Morphologic classification and stress analysis of the mandibular bone in the premolar region for implant placement

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 482-490

  Hudieb, Malik ^a   Wakabayashi, Noriyuki ^a   Suzuki, Tetsuya ^b   Kasugai, Shohei ^a  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b IWATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bone morphology; Computed tomography; Dental implant; Mandible; Stress

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL CARE; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; JAW; MALE; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICS; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; BICUSPID; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77955888843     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Kingsmill VJ. Post extraction remodeling of the adult mandible. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1999;10: 384-404.
2. Neufeld JO. Changes in the trabecular pattern of the mandible following the loss of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1958;8: 685-697.
3. Atwood DA. Post extraction changes in the adult mandible illustrated by microradiographs of midsagittal sections and serial cepha lometric roentgenograms. J Prosthet Dent 1963;13: 810-824.
4. Pudwill ML, Wentz FM. Microscopic anatomy of edentulous residual alveolar ridges. J Prosthet Dent 1975;34: 448-455.
5. Gross MD, Nissan J. Stress distribution around maxillary implants in anatomic photoelastic models of varying geometry. Part II. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85: 450-454.
6. Nagasao T, Kobayashi M, Tsuchiya Y, Kaneko T, Nakajima T. Finite element analysis of the stresses around fixtures in various reconstructed mandibular models- Part II (effect of horizontal load). J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2003;31: 168-175.
7. Petrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: Influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16: 486-494.
8. Tada S, Stegaroiu R, Kitamura E, Miyakawa O, Kusakari H. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18: 357-368.
9. Abu-Hammad O, Khraisat A, Dar-Odeh N, El-Maaytah M. Effect of dental implant cross-sectional design on cortical bone structure using finite element analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2007;9: 217-221.
10. Maezawa N, Shiota M, Kasugai S, Wakabayashi N, Three-dimensional stress analysis of tooth/implant-retained long-span fixed dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22: 710-718.
11. Hoshaw SJ, Brunski JB, Cochran GVB. Mechanical loading of Brånemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9: 345-360.
12. Mori S, Burr DB. Increased intracortical remodeling following fatigue damage. Bone 1993;14: 103-109.
13. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Oral implant treatment in posterior partially edentulous jaws: A 5- year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8: 635-640.
14. Wennerberg A, Jemt T. Complications in partially edentulous implant patients: A 5-year retrospective follow-up study of 133 patients supplied with unilateral maxillary prostheses. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999;1: 49-56.
15. Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11(suppl): 156-158.
16. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JYK. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90: 121-132.
17. Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: Clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16: 26-35.
18. Misch CE. Consideration of biomechanical stress in treatment with dental implants. Dent Today 2006;25: 80-85.
19. Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85: 585-598.
20. van Oosterwyck H, Duyck J, Vander Sloten J, et al. The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9: 407-418.
21. Korioth TW, Versluis A. Modeling the mechanical behavior of the jaws and their related structures by finite element (FE) analysis. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8: 90-104.
22. Quirynen M, Mraiwa N, van Steenberghe D, Jacobs R. Morphology and dimensions of the mandibular jaw bone in the interforaminal region in patients requiring implants in the distal areas. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14: 280-285.
23. Satoh T, Maeda Y, Komiyama Y. Biomechanical rationale for intentionally inclined implants in the posterior mandible using 3D finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20: 533-539.
24. Wang TM, Leu LJ, Wang J, Lin LD. Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: A numeric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17: 231-237.
25. Benzing UR, Gall H, Weber H. Biomechanical aspects of two different implant-prosthetic concepts for edentulous maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10: 188-198.
26. Teixeira ER, Sato Y, Shindoi N. A comparative evaluation of mandibular finite element models with different lengths and elements for implant biomechanics. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25: 299-303.
27. Mericske-Stern R, Assal P, Mericske E, Burgin W. Occlusal force and oral tactile sensibility measured in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10: 345-353.
28. Ishigaki S, Nakano T, Yamada S, Nakamura T, Takashima F. Biomechanical stress in bone surrounding an implant under simulated chewing. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14: 97-102.
29. Frost HM. Bone '‘mass’' and the '‘mechanostat’': A proposal. Anat Rec 1987;219: 1-9.
30. Güler AU, Sumer M, Sumer P, Biçer I. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32: 741-746.
31. Pietrokovski J, Massler M. Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent 1967;17: 21-27.
32. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: A mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27: 120-132.
33. Jacobs R, Schotte A, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I. Posterior jaw bone resorption in osseointegrated implantsupported overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3: 63-70.
34. Van Eijden TMGJ. Biomechanics of the mandible. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2000;11: 123-136.
35. Hylander WL. Mandibular function and biomechanical stress and scaling. Am Zool 1985;25: 223-240.
36. Mosley JR, Lanyon LE. Strain rate as a controlling influence on adaptive modeling in response to dynamic loading of the ulna in growing male rats. Bone 1998;23: 313-318.
37. Pattin CA, Calert WE, Carter DR. Cyclic mechanical property degradation during fatigue loading of cortical bone. J Biomech 1996;29: 69-79.
38. Brunski JB. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface. Adv Dent Res 1999;13: 99-119.
39. Duyck J, Rønold HJ, Van Oosterwyck H, Naert I, Vander Sloten J, Ellingsen JE. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: An animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12: 207-218.
40. Petrie CS, Williams JL. Probabilistic analysis of peri-implant strain predictions as influenced by uncertainties in bone properties and occlusal forces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18: 611-619.
41. Akça K, Iplikçioglu H. Evaluation of the effect of the residual bone angulation on implant-supported fixed prosthesis in mandibular posterior edentulis. Part II: 3-D finite element stress analysis. Implant Dent 2001;10: 238-245.
42. Huang HL, Chang CH, Hsu JT, Fallgatter AM, Ko CC. Comparison of implant body designs and threaded designs of dental implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22: 551-562.
43. O’Mahony AM, Williams JL, Spencer P. Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri-implant stress and strain under oblique loading. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12: 648-657.
44. Steinemann SG, Eulenberger J, Maeusli PA, Schroeder A. Adhesion of bone to titanium. In: Christel P, Meunier A, Lee AJC (eds). Biological and Biomechanical Performance of Biomaterials. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1986: 409-414.
45. Hong L, Hengchang X, de Groot K. Tensile strength of the interface between hydroxyapatite and bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26: 7-18.
46. Skripitz R, Aspenberg P. Tensile bonding between bone and titanium. Acta Orthop Scand 1998;69: 315-319.
47. Meijer HJA, Starmans FJM, Steen WHA, Bosman F. A threedimensional finite element analysis of bone around dental implants in an edentulous human mandible. Arch Oral Biol 1993;38: 491-496.
48. Stanford CM, Brand RA. Toward an understanding of implant occlusion and strain adaptive bone modeling and remodeling. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81: 553-561.
49. Al-Sukhun J, Helenius M, Lindqvist C, Kelleway J. Biomechanics of the mandible part I: Measurement of mandibular functional deformation using custom-fabricated displacement transducers. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64: 1015-1022.