Evaluation of the Effect of the Residual Bone Angulation on Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis in Mandibular Posterior Edentulism Part II: 3-D Finite Element Stress Analysis

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 238-245

  Akça, Kivanç ^a,b   Iplikçioǧlu, Haldun ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Bucco lingual angulation; Finite element stress analyses; Mandibular posterior edentulism

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; MASTICATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BICUSPID; BITE FORCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MANDIBLE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOLAR; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0035751438     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008505-200110000-00006     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, et al. A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:291-298.
2. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Oral implant treatment in posterior partially edentulous jaws: A 5-year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:635-640.
3. Robert AL, Donald SC, Thomas GW, et al. A multicenter retrospective analysis of the ITI implant system used for single-tooth replacements: Preliminary results at 6 or more months of loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12:237-242.
4. Wyatt CCL, Zarb GA. Treatment outcomes of patients with implant-supported fixed partial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:204-211.
5. Jemt T, Leckholm U, Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: A preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989;4:211-217.
6. Pylant T, Triplett RG, Key MC, et al. A retrospective evaluation of endosseous titanium implants in the partially edentulous patient. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7:195-202.
7. Koumjian HK, Smith RA. Tissue integrated prostheses on malaligned implants in a partially edentulous patient. A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:211-214.
8. Rangert B, Krogh PHJ, Langer B, et al. Bending overload and implant fracture. A retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10:326-334.
9. Richter EJ. In vivo horizontal bending moment on implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:232-244.
10. Jemt T, Linden B, Lekholm U. Failures and complications in 127 consecutively placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Branemark implants: From prosthetic treatment to first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7:40-44.
11. Kay HB. Free standing versus implant tooth interconnected restorations: Understanding the prosthodontic perspective. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. 1993; 13:47-69.
12. Olsson M, Gunne J, Astrand P, et al. Bridges supported by free standing implants versus bridges supported by tooth and implant. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995;6:114-121.
13. Denissen HW, Kalh W, Waas MAJ. Anatomic consideration for preventive implantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:191-196.
14. Richter EJ. Basic biomechanics of dental implants in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61:602-609.
15. Lavelle CLB. Biomechanical considerations of prosthodontic therapy: The urgency of research into alveolar bone responses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:179-185.
16. Weinberg LA. The biomechanics of force distribution in implant-supported prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:19-31.
17. Piatelli A, Scarano A, Paolantonio M. Clinical and histologic features of a non-axial load on the osseointegrated of a posterior mandibular implant: Report of a case. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:273-275.
18. Leonardis DD, Garg KA, Pecora EG. Osseointegration of rough acid-etched titanium implants: 5-year follow-up of 100 Minimatic implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:384-391.
19. Masuda T, Yliheikkila PK, Felton DA, et al. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part I. In-vivo studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:17-29.
20. Cooper LF, Masuda T, Yliheikkila PK, et al. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part II. In-vitro studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:163-174.
21. Hoshaw SJ, Brunski JB, Cochran GVB. Mechanical loading of Branemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:345-360.
22. Quirynen M, Naert I, Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and implant success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992;3:104-111.
23. Teixeira ER, Sato Y, Akagawa Y, et al. A comparative evaluation of mandibular finite element models with different lengths and elements for implant biomechanics. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25:299-303.
24. Waskewicz GA, Ostrowski JS, Parks VJ. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution transmitted from a fixed prosthesis attached to osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:405-411.
25. Clelland NL, Gilat A, McGlumphy EA, et al. A photoelastic and strain gauge analysis of angled abutments for an implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:541-548.
26. Richter EJ. In vivo vertical forces on implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10:99-108.
27. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:843-848.
28. Kregzde M. A method of selecting the best implant prosthesis design option using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:662-673.
29. Meijer HJA, Starmans FJM, Steen WHA, et al. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of bone around dental implants in an edentulous human mandible. Arch Oral Biol. 1993;38:491-496.
30. Meniccuci G, Lorenzetti M, Pera P, et al. Mandibular implant retained overdenture: Finite element analysis of two anchorage systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:369-376.
31. Zyl PP, Grundling NL, Jooste CH, et al. Three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible incorporating six osseointegrated implants for stress analysis of mandibular cantilever prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995; 10:51-57.
32. Siegele D, Soltesz U. Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989;4:333-340.
33. Homes DC, Grisgsby WR, Goel VK, et al. Comparison of stress transmissions in the IMZ implant system with polyoxymethylene or titanium intramobile element: A finite element stress analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7: 450-458.
34. Rubin C, Krishnamurthy N, Capilouto E, et al. Stress analysis of a human tooth using a three-dimensional finite element model. J Dent Res. 1983;62:82-86.
35. Clelland NL, Ismail YH, Zaki HS, et al. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis in and around the screw-vent implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:391-398.
36. Sertgöz A, Güvener S. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76:165-169.
37. Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne SC, et al. 3D-FEA of osseointegration percentages and patterns on implant bone interfacial stresses. J Dent. 1997; 25:485-491.
38. Sakaguchi RL, Borgersen SE. Non-linear finite element contact analysis of dental implant components. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:655-661.
39. Meijer HJA, Starmans FJM, Bosman F, et al. A comparison of three finite element models of an edentulous mandible provided with implants. Arch Oral Biol. 1993;20:147-157.
40. Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne SC, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76:633-640.
41. Williams KR, Watson CJ, Murphy WM, et al. Finite element analysis of fixed prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants. Quintessence Int. 1990;21:563-570.
42. Sullivan DY. Prosthetic considerations for the utilization of osseointegrated fixtures in the partially edentulous arch. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986; 1:39-45.
43. Stegaroiu R, Sato T, Kusakari H, et al. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:82-90.
44. Carlsson GE, Haraldson T. Functional response. In: Brånemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue-Integrated Prostheses. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985:155-163.
45. Mericske-Stern R, Assal P, Mericske E, et al. Occlusal force and oral sensibility measured in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10: 345-354.
46. Akça K, Iplikc̊ioǧlu H. Evaluation of the effect of the residual bone angulation on implant-supported fixed prostheses in mandibular posterior edentulism. Part I: Spiral computed tomography study. Implant Dent. 2001; 3:216-222.