Assessing the impact of university reputation on stakeholder intentions

Journal of General Management

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 35-45

  Ressler, Jamie ^a   Abratt, Russell ^b,c  

^a PALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955800417     PISSN: 03063070     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/030630700903500104     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ajzen, I. (2006), Behavioral Interventions Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior, [Online] Available at: http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.intervention.pdf (Accessed 5 September 2008).
2. Alessandri, S. W., Yang, S. and Kinsey, D. F. (2006), 'An integrative approach to university visual identity and reputation,' Corporate Reputation Review, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 257-270.
3. Arpan, L. M., Raney, A. A. and Zivnuska, S. (2003), 'A cognitive approach to understanding university image', Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 97-113.
4. Balmer, J. M. T. and Greyser, S. A. (2006), 'Corporate marketing Integrating corporate identity, corporate branding, corporate communications, corporate image and corporate reputation', European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 40, No. 7/8, pp. 730-741.
5. Balmer, J. M. T. and Liao, M. (2007), 'Student corporate brand identification: an exploratory case study', Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 356-375.
6. Barnett, M. L., Jermier, J. M. and Lafferty, B. A. (2006), 'Corporate reputation: the definitional landscape', Corporate Reputation Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 26-40.
7. Brown, S. P. (1995), 'The moderating effects of insuppliers/outsuuppliers status on organisational buyer attitudes', Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 170-181.
8. Brown, T. J., Dacin, P. A., Pratt, M. G. and Whetten, D. A. (2006), 'Identity, intended image, construed image, and reputation: An interdisciplinary framework and suggested terminology', Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 99-106.
9. Buchholz, R. A. and Rosenthal, S. B. (2005), 'Toward a Contempory Conceptual Framework for Stakeholder Theory', Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 58, pp. 13-48.
10. Caruana, A., Cohen, C. and Krentler, K. A. (2006), 'Corporate reputation and shareholders' intentions: An attitudinal perspective', Brand Management, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 429-440.
11. Etgar, M. (2008), 'A descriptive model of the consumer co-production process', Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 97-108.
12. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
13. Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A. and Sever, J. M. (2000), 'The Reputation Quotient (SM): A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation', The Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 241-255.
14. Helgesen, O. and Nesset, E. (2007), 'Images, satisfaction and antecedents: Drivers of student loyalty? A case study of a Norwegian university college', Corporate Reputation Review, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 38-60.
15. Helm, S. (2005), 'Designing a formative measure for corporate reputation', Corporate Reputation Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 95-111.
16. Ivy, J. (2001), 'Higher education institution image: a correspondence analysis approach', The International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 276-282.
17. Kazoleas, D., Kim, Y. and Moffitt, M. A. (2001), 'Institutional image: a case study', Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 205-216.
18. Landrum, R.E., Turrisi, R. and Harless, C. (1998), 'University image: The benefits of assessment and modeling', Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 53-68.
19. Money, K. and Hillenbrand, C. (2006), 'Using Reputation measurement to create value: An analysis and integration of existing measures', Journal of General Management, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 1-12.
20. Nguyen, N. and LeBlanc, G. (2001), 'Corporate image and corporate reputation in customers' retention decision in services', Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 227-236.
21. Ou, W. M. and Abratt, R. (2006), 'Diagnosing the relationship between corporate reputation and retail patronage', Corporate Reputation Review, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 243-257.
22. Parameswaran, R. and Glowacka, A. E. (1995), 'University image: An information processing perspective', Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 41-56.
23. Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K. and Frow, P. (2008), 'Managing the co-creation of value', Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 83-96.
24. Post, J. E., Preston, L. E. and Sachs, S. (2002), 'Managing the Extended Enterprise: The new Stakeholder View', California Management Review, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 6-28.
25. Shamma, H. (2007), A Stakeholder Perspective for Examining Corporate Reputation: An Empirical Study of the US Wireless Telecommunications Industry, PhD, Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
26. Spears, N., Brown, T. J. and Dacin, P. A. (2006), 'Assessing the corporate brand: The Unique Corporate Association Valence (UCAV) approach', Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 14, No. 1/2, pp. 5-20.
27. To,er, A. (1980), The third wave, Boulder, CO: William Morrow.
28. Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F. (2008), 'Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution', Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 1-10.
29. Vidaver-Cohen, D. (2007), 'Reputation Beyond the Rankings: A Conceputal Framework for Business School Research', Corporate Reputation Review, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 278-304.
30. Walsh, G. and Beatty, S. E. (2007), 'Customer-based corporate reputation of a service firm: scale development and validation', Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 2007, No. 35, pp. 127-143.