Toward a contemporary conceptual framework for stakeholder theory

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 137-148

  Buchholz, Rogene A ^a   Rosenthal, Sandra B ^a  

^a Loyola University New Orleans   (United States)

Author keywords

Business and society; Stakeholder theory progmatism

Indexed keywords

EID: 21644460123     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-005-1393-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Bellah, R. N. et al.: 1991, The Good Society, (Knopf, New York).
2. Bohm, D.: 1980, Wholeness and the Implicate Order. (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London).
3. Buchholz, R. A. and S. B. Rosenthal: 1997, 'Business and Society: What's in a Name,' The International Journal of Organizational Analysis 5, 180-201.
4. Capra, F.: 1996, The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems (Anchor Doubleday, New York).
5. Carroll, A. B.: 1996, Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, 3rd Edition (Southwestern, Cincinnati).
6. Clarkson, M. et al.: 1994, 'The Toronto Conference: Reflections on Stakeholder Theory', Business and Society 33, 83-131.
7. Clarkson, M.B.E, (ed.) 1998, The Corporation and its Stakeholders: Classic and Contemporary Readings, (University of Toronto Press, Toronto).
8. Dewey, J.: 1978, ' Ethics', In J. A. Boydston (ed.), The Middle Works, Vol. 5. (Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL).
9. Dewey, J.: 1984. 'The Public and its Problems', in J. A. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, Vol.2. (Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL).
10. Dewey, J.: 1987, 'Authority and Social Change', in J. A. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, Vol. 11. (Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL).
11. Donaldson, T. and L. Preston: 1995, The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications', Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.
12. Flowers, C.: 1998, A Science Odyssey: 100 Years of Discovery, (William Morrow and Company, Inc., New York).
13. Fox, W. and R. Sheldrake: 1997, Natural Grace: Dialogues on Creation, Darkness, and the Soul in Spirituality and Science, (Doubleday, New York).
14. Frederick, W. C.: 1992, Social issues in management: Coming of age or prematurely gray? Paper presented to the Doctoral Consortium of the Social Issues in Management Division. The Academy of Management, Las Vegas, Nevada.
15. Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, (Pitman, Boston).
16. Freeman, R. E.: 1994, The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions', Business Ethics Quarterly 4, 414-427.
17. Goodpaster, K.: 1991, 'Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis', Business Ethics Quarterly 1, 53-73.
18. Goodpaster, K. and T. Holloran: 1994, 'In Defense of a Paradox', Business Ethics Quarterly 4, 423-429.
19. Mead, G. H.: 1934, Mind, Self, and Society, in C. Morris (ed.) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
20. Mead, G. H.: 1959, The Philosophy of the Present (Open Court, La Salle, IL).
21. Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle and D. J. Wood: 1997, Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts', The Academy of Management Review 22, 853-886.
22. Power, T. M.: 2000, Trapped in Consumption: Modern Social Structure and the Entrenchment of the Device', in Higgs, Light and Strong (eds.), Technology and the Good Life (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
23. Preston, L. E. and J. E. Post: 1975, Private Management and Public Policy (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
24. Solomon, R. C.: 1993, Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business (Oxford University Press, New York).
25. Wicks, A. C. D. R. Gilbert and R. H. Freeman: 1994, 'A Feminist Reinterpretation of the Stakeholder Concept', Business Ethics Quarterly 4, 475-497.