"Have you been married, or.?": Eliciting and accounting for relationship histories in speed-dating interaction

Research on Language and Social Interaction

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 260-282

  Stokoe, Elizabeth ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955783625     PISSN: 08351813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08351813.2010.497988     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Antaki, C. (2008). Formulations in psychotherapy. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis of psychotherapy (pp. 26-42). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2. Antaki, C., Barnes, R., & Leudar, I. (2005). Self-disclosure as a situated interactional practice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 181-199.
3. Baxter, L. A., & West, L. (2003). Couple perceptions of their similarities and differences: A dialectical perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 491-514.
4. Belot, M., & Francesconi, M. (2006). Can anyone be "The" one? Evidence on mate selection from speed dating (Discussion Article No. 2377). Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.
5. Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
6. Bolden, G. B. (2006). Little words that matter: Discourse markers "so" and "oh" and the doing of other-attentiveness in social interaction. Journal of Communication, 56, 661-688.
7. Bolden, G. B. (2008). "So what's up?": Using the discourse marker so to launch conversational business. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41, 302-337.
8. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex difference in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
9. Derlega, V. J., Winstead, B. A., & Greene, K. (2008). Self-disclosure and starting a close relationship. In S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), The handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 153-174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Drew, P. (1992). Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a rape trial. In P. Drew &J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 470-520). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11. Drew, P. (2005). Conversation analysis. In K. L. Fitch&R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 71-102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Drew, P., & Holt, E. (1998). Figures of speech: Figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation. Language in Society, 27, 495-522.
13. Drew, P., & Walker, T. (2009). Going too far: Complaining, escalating and disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2400-2414.
14. Eastwick, P.W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008a). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 245-264.
15. Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008b). Speed-dating as a methodological innovation. The Psychologist, 21(5), 2-3.
16. Edwards, D. (1994). Script formulations: A study of event descriptions in conversation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 211-247.
17. Edwards, D. (1995). Two to tango: Script formulations, dispositions, and rhetorical symmetry in relationship troubles talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 319-350.
18. Edwards, D. (1998). The relevant thing about her: Social identity categories in use. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 15-33). London, England: Sage.
19. Edwards, D. (2005). Moaning, whinging and laughing: The subjective side of complaints. Discourse Studies, 7, 5-29.
20. Edwards, D. (2007). Managing subjectivity in talk. In A. Hepburn & S. Wiggins (Eds.), Discursive research in practice: New approaches to psychology and interaction talk (pp. 31-49). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London, England: Sage.
22. Feeney, J. A. (2006). Studying close relationships: Methodological challenges and advances. In P. Noller & J. A. Feeney (Eds.), Close relationships: Functions, forms and processes (pp. 49-64). New York, NY: Psychology.
23. Finkel, E. J., & Eastwick, P. W. (2008). Speed-dating. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 193-197.
24. Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P.W., & Matthews, J. (2007). Speed-dating as an invaluable tool for studying romantic attraction: A methodological primer. Personal Relationships, 14, 149-166.
25. Fishman, P. (1978). Interaction: The work women do. Social Problems, 25, 397-406.
26. Fisman, R., Iyengar, S. S., Kamenica, E., & Simonson, I. (2006). Gender differences in mate selection: Evidence from a speed dating experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 673-697.
27. Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97-121). New York, NY: Irvington.
28. Goodwin, M. H. (2007). Occasioned knowledge exploration in family interaction. Discourse & Society, 18, 93-110.
29. Gottman, J. M., & Driver, J. L. (2005). Dysfunctional marital conflict and everyday marital interaction. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 43(3-4), 63-78.
30. Heritage, J. (2005). Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 103-146). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Holt, E. (2000). Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 425-454.
32. Houser, M. L., Horan, S. M., & Furler, L. A. (2008). Dating in the fast lane: How communication predicts speed-dating success. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 749-768.
33. Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
34. Kidwell, M., & González Martínez, E. (2010). "Let me tell you about myself": A method for suppressing subject talk in a "soft accusation" interrogation. Discourse Studies, 12, 65-89.
35. Kitzinger, C. (2000). How to resist an idiom. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 121-154.
36. Kitzinger, C. (2005). Heteronormativity in action: Reproducing the heterosexual nuclear family in after-hours medical calls. Social Problems, 52, 477-498.
37. Koshik, I. (2002). A conversation analytic study of yes/no questions which convey reversed polarity assertions. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1851-1877.
38. Kruger, D. J., & Fisher, M. L. (2008). Women's life history attributes are associated with preferences in mating relationships. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 289-302.
39. Kurzban, R., & Weeden, J. (2005). HurryDate: Mate preferences in action. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 26, 227-244.
40. Luo, S., & Zhang, C. (2009). What leads to romantic attraction: Similarity, reciprocity, security or beauty? Evidence from a speed-dating study. Journal of Personality, 77, 933-964.
41. Mandelbaum, J. (1987). Couples sharing stories. Communication Quarterly, 35, 144-170.
42. Mandelbaum, J. (2003). Interactivemethods for constructing relationships. In P. Glenn, C. LeBaron,&J.Mandelbaum(Eds.). Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper (pp. 207-220).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43. Mulford, M., Orbell, J., Shatto, C., & Stockard, J. (1998). Physical attractiveness, opportunity, and success in everyday exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 1565-1592.
44. Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. (2008). Speed dating as a paradigm for the study of initial romantic attraction, mate choice and courtship behaviour. Journal of Psychology, 43, 348-527.
45. Pomerantz, A., & Mandelbaum, J. (2005). A Conversation analytic approach to relationships: Their relevance for interactional conduct. In K. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 149-171). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2007). Discursive psychology, institutions and child protection. In A.Weatherall, B.Watson, & C. Gallois (Eds). Language and social psychology handbook (pp. 160-181). London, England: Palgrave.
47. Provost, M. P., Kormos, C., Kosakoski, G., & Quinsey, V. L. (2006). Sociosexuality in women and preference for facial masculinization and somatotype in men. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 35, 305-312.
48. Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/No interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939-967.
49. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
50. Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 101-114.
51. Sprecher, S., Wenzel, A., & Harvey, J. (Eds.). (2008). The handbook of relationship initiation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52. Staske, S. (1996). Talking feelings: The collaborative construction of emotion in talk between close relational partners. Symbolic Interaction, 19, 111-135.
53. Staske, S. (1998).The normalization of problematic emotion in conversations between close relational partners: Interpersonal emotion work. Symbolic Interaction, 21, 59-86.
54. Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41, 31-57.
55. Stivers, T., & Heritage, J. (2001). Breaking the sequential mold: Answering "more than the question" during comprehensive history taking. Text, 21(1/2), 151-185.
56. Stokoe, E. (2008). Categories and sequences: Formulating gender in talk-in-interaction. In L. Litosseliti, H. Saunston, K. Segall, & J. Sunderland (Eds.), Language and gender research methodologies (pp. 139-157). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
57. Stokoe, E. (2009a). "For the benefit of the tape": Formulating embodied conduct in designedly uni-modal recorded policesuspect interrogations. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1887-1904.
58. Stokoe, E. (2009b). "I've got a girlfriend": Police officers doing "self-disclosure" in their interrogations of suspects. Narrative Inquiry, 19, 154-182.
59. Svennevig, J. (1999). Getting acquainted in conversation: A study of initial interactions. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
60. Todd, P. M., Penke, L., Fasolo, B., & Lenton, A. P. (2007). Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 15011-15016.
61. Traverso, V. (2009). The dilemmas of third-party complaints in conversation between friends. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2385-2399.
62. Waring, H. (2002). Expressing noncomprehension in a U.S. graduate seminar. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1711-1731.
63. Wilson, G. D., Cousins, J. M., & Fink, B. (2006). The CQ as a predictor of speed-date outcomes. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 21, 163-169.