What leads to romantic attraction: Similarity, reciprocity, security, or beauty? Evidence from a speed-dating study

Journal of Personality

Volumn 77, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 933-964

  Luo, Shanhong ^a   Zhang, Guangjian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68149168804     PISSN: 00223506     EISSN: 14676494     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00570.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Aronson, E. Worchel, P. (1966). Similarity versus liking as determinants of interpersonal attractiveness. Psychonomic Science, 5, 157 158.
2. Bartholomew, K. Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226 244.
3. Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, E. Walster, G. W. (1971). Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 173 189.
4. Berscheid, E. Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In D. T. Gilbert S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 193 281). New York : Oxford University Press.
5. Berscheid, E. Walster, E. H. (1978). Interpersonal attraction. Addison-Wesley.
6. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol.II. Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York : Basic Books.
7. Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L. Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. Simpson, J. A. Rholes, W. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46 76). New York : Guilford Press.
8. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1 49.
9. Buss, D. M. Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204 232.
10. Byrne, D. G. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 713 715.
11. Byrne, D. G. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York : Academic Press.
12. Byrne, D., Ervin, C. E. Lamberth, J. (1970). Continuity between the experimental study of attraction and real-life computer dating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 157 165.
13. Byrne, D. Nelson, D. (1965). Attraction as a linear function of proportion of positive reinforcements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 659 663.
14. Chappell, K. D. Davis, K. E. (1998). Attachment, partner choice, and perception of romantic partners: An experimental test of the attachment-security hypothesis. Personal Relationships, 5, 327 347.
15. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed Hillsdale, NJ : Earlbaum.
16. Condon, J. W. Crano, W. D. (1988). Inferred evaluation and the relation between attitude similarity and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54, 789 797.
17. Cooper, H. Hedges, L. V. (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York : Sage Publications.
18. Curtis, R. C. Miller, K. (1986). Believing another likes or dislikes you: Behaviors making the beliefs come true. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 284 290.
19. Eastwick, P. W. Finkel, E. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 245 264.
20. Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., Mochon, D. Ariely, D. (2007). Selective versus unselective romantic desire: Not all reciprocity is created equal. Psychological Science, 18, 317 319.
21. Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 981 993.
22. Field, A. P. (2001). Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods. Psychological Methods, 6, 161 180. (Pubitemid 33604037)
23. Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W. Matthews, J. (2007). Speed-dating as an invaluable tool for studying romantic attraction: A methodological primer. Personal Relationships, 14, 149 166.
24. Fisman, R., Iyengar, S. S., Kamenica, E. Simonson, I. (2006). Gender differences in mate selection: Evidence from a speed-dating experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 673 697.
25. Gattis, K. S., Berns, S., Simpson, L. E. Christensen, A. (2004). Birds of a feather or strange birds? Ties among personality dimensions, similarity, and marital quality. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 564 574. (Pubitemid 40030797)
26. Gold, J. A., Ryckman, R. M. Mosley, N. R. (1984). Romantic mood induction and attraction to a dissimilar other: Is love blind? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 358 368.
27. Hazan, C. Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511 524.
28. Hedges, L. V. Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods in the meta-analyses of research on gender differences. In J. S. Hyde M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 14 50). Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
29. Hedges, L. V. Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486 504. (Pubitemid 128459639)
30. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
31. Herbst, K. C., Gaertner, L. Insko, C. A. (2003). My head says yes but my heart says no: Cognitive and affective attraction as a function of similarity to the ideal self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1206 1219. (Pubitemid 37189379)
32. John, O. P. Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality (2nd ed., pp. 102 138). New York : Guilford.
33. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perceptions. New York : Guilford.
34. Kenny, D. A. (1998). Social Relations Modeling (information and programs of BLOCKO and SOREMO). Retrieved December 10, 2008, from
35. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A. Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York : Guilford.
36. Klohnen, E. C. Luo, S. (2003). Interpersonal attraction and personality: What is attractive - Self similarity, ideal similarity, complementarity, or attachment security? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 709 722. (Pubitemid 37249680)
37. Kurzban, R. Weeden, J. (2005). Hurrydate: Mate preferences in action. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 227 244. (Pubitemid 40587390)
38. Kurzban, R. Weeden, J. (2008). Do advertised preferences predict the behavior of speed daters? Personal Relationships, 14, 623 632.
39. Latty-Mann, H. Davis, K. E. (1996). Attachment theory and partner choice: Preferences and actuality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 5 23. (Pubitemid 126172033)
40. Li, N. P. Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468 489. (Pubitemid 43881471)
41. Luo, S. Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and marital quality in newlyweds: A couple-centered approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 304 326. (Pubitemid 40217036)
42. Moreland, R. L. Beach, S. R. (1992). Exposure effect in the classroom: The development of affinity among students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 255 276.
43. Murray, S, L. (2006). Self-esteem: Its relational contingencies and consequences. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Self-esteem issues and answers: A sourcebook of current perspectives (pp. 350 358). New York : Psychology Press.
44. Newcomb, T. M. (1956). The prediction of interpersonal attraction. American Psychologist, 11, 575 586.
45. Rokeach, M. Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1989). Stability and change in American value priorities, 1968-1981. American Psychologist, 44, 775 784.
46. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
47. Schwartz, S. H. Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878 891.
48. Sprecher, S. Duck, S. (1994). Sweet talk: The importance of perceived communication for romantic and friendship attraction experienced during a get-acquainted date. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 391 400.
49. Todd, P. M., Penke, L., Fasolo, B. Lenton, A. P. (2007). Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 15011 15016. (Pubitemid 47619584)
50. Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D. Rottman, L. (1966). Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 508 516.
51. Watson, D., Clark, L. A. Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063 1070.
52. Watson, D., Klohnen, E. C., Casillas, A., Simms, E. N., Haig, J. Berry, D. S. (2004). Match makers and deal breakers: Analyses of assortative mating in newlywed couples. Journal of Personality, 72, 1029 1068. (Pubitemid 39307918)
53. Wetzel, C. G. Insko, C. A. (1982). The similarity-attraction relationship: Is there an ideal one? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 253 276.