Interactions between behavioral and life-history trade-offs in the evolution of integrated predator-defense plasticity

American Naturalist

Volumn 176, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 276-288

  Cressler, Clayton E ^a   King, Aaron A ^a   Werner, Earl E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Evolutionary computation; Foraging predation risk trade off; Inducible defense; Phenotypic plasticity; Predator prey

Indexed keywords

DEFENSE MECHANISM; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; FORAGING EFFICIENCY; GROWTH RATE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; ONTOGENY; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PREDATION RISK; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; REPRODUCTIVE PRODUCTIVITY; TRADE-OFF;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BODY SIZE; ESCAPE BEHAVIOR; EVOLUTION; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD CHAIN; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BODY SIZE; ESCAPE REACTION; EVOLUTION; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD CHAIN; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHENOTYPE; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION;

EID: 77955595589     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/655425     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Abrahams, M., and M. Healey. 1993. A comparison of the willingness of four species of Pacific salmon to risk exposure to a predator. Oikos 66:439-446.
2. Abrams, P. A. 1991. Life-history and the relationship between food availability and foraging effort. Ecology 72:1242-1252.
3. -. 1992. Predators that benefit prey and prey that harm predators: unusual effects of interacting foraging adaptations. American Naturalist 140:573-600.
4. -. 1995. Implications of dynamically variable traits for identifying, classifying, and measuring direct and indirect effects in ecological communities. American Naturalist 146:112-134.
5. -. 2001. Describing and quantifying interspecific interactions: a commentary on recent approaches. Oikos 94:209-218.
6. Abrams, P. A., and L. Rowe. 1996. The effects of predation on the age and size of maturity of prey. Evolution 50:1052-1061.
7. Abrams, P. A., H. Matsuda, and Y. Harada. 1993. Evolutionarily unstable fitness maxima and stable fitness minima of continuous traits. Evolutionary Ecology 7:465-487.
8. Anholt, B. R., E. E. Werner, and D. K. Skelly. 2000. Effect of food and predators on the activity of four larval ranid frogs. Ecology 81:3509-3521.
9. Ball, S. L., and R. L. Baker. 1996. Predator-induced life history changes: antipredator behavior costs or facultative life history shifts? Ecology 77:1116-1124.
10. Beckerman, A. P., K. Wieski, and D. J. Baird. 2007. Behavioural versus physiological mediation of life history under predation risk. Oecologia (Berlin) 152:335-343.
11. Benton, T. G., and A. Grant. 2000. Evolutionary fitness in ecology: comparing measures of fitness in stochastic, density-dependent environments. Evolutionary Ecology Research 2:769-789.
12. Boeing, W. J., C. W. Ramcharan, and H. P. Riessen. 2006. Multiple predator defence strategies in Daphnia pulex and their relation to native habitat. Journal of Plankton Research 28:571-584.
13. Bolker, B., M. Holyoak, V. Krivan, L. Rowe, and O. Schmitz. 2003. Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait-mediated interactions. Ecology 84:1101-1114.
14. Brodin, T., D. J. Mikolajewski, and F. Johansson. 2006. Behavioural and life history effects of predator diet cues during ontogeny in damselfly larvae. Oecologia (Berlin) 148:162-169.
15. Chase, J. M. 1999. To grow or to reproduce? the role of life-history plasticity in food web dynamics. American Naturalist 154:571-586.
16. Clark, C. W., and C. D. Harvell. 1992. Inducible defenses and the allocation of resources: a minimal model. American Naturalist 139:521-539.
17. Crowl, T., and A. Covich. 1990. Predator-induced life-history shifts in a freshwater snail. Science 247:949-951.
18. Day, T., P. A. Abrams, and J. M. Chase. 2002. The role of size-specific predation in the evolution and diversification of prey life histories. Evolution 56:877-887.
19. De Meester, L., L. J. Weider, and R. Tollrian. 1995. Alternative antipredator defenses and genetic polymorphism in a pelagic predator-prey system. Nature 378:483-485.
20. de Roos, A. M. 1997. A gentle introduction to physiologically structured population models. Pages 119-204 in S. Tuljapurkar and H. Caswell, eds. Structured population models in marine, terrestrial and freshwater systems. Chapman & Hall, New York.
21. de Roos, A. M., J. A. J. Metz, E. Evers, and A. Leipoldt. 1990. A size dependent predator-prey interaction: who pursues whom? Journal of Mathematical Biology 28:609-643.
22. de Roos, A. M., L. Persson, and E. McCauley. 2003. The influence of size-dependent life-history traits on the structure and dynamics of populations and communities. Ecology Letters 6:473-487.
23. Ernande, B., U. Dieckmann, and M. Heino. 2004. Adaptive changes in harvested populations: plasticity and evolution of age and size at maturation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 271:415-423.
24. Furnass, T. I. 1979. Laboratory experiments on prey selection by perch fry (Perca fluviatilis). Freshwater Biology 9:33-43.
25. Gårdmark, A., and U. Dieckmann. 2006. Disparate maturation adaptations to size-dependent mortality. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273:2185-2192.
26. Gerritsen, J., and J. R. Strickler. 1977. Encounter probabilities and community structure in zooplankton: a mathematical model. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 34:73-82.
27. Hammill, E., P. Kratina, A. P. Beckerman, and B. R. Anholt. 2010. Precise time interactions between behavioural and morphological defences. Oikos 119:494-499.
28. Holland, J. H. 1975. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
29. Hoverman, J. T., J. R. Auld, and R. A. Relyea. 2005. Putting prey back together again: integrating predator-induced behavior, morphology, and life history. Oecologia (Berlin) 144:481-491.
30. Kooijman, S. A. L. M. 2000. Dynamic energy and mass budgets in biological systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
31. Kooijman, S. A. L. M., and J. A. J. Metz. 1984. On the dynamics of chemically stressed populations: the deduction of population consequences from effects on individuals. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 8:254-274.
32. Leibold, M. A., A. J. Tessier, and C. T. West. 1994. Genetic, acclimatization, and ontogenetic effects on habitat selection behavior in Daphnia pulicaria. Evolution 48:1324-1332.
33. Lima, S. L., and L. M. Dill. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68:619-640.
34. Mikolajewski, D. J., and F. Johansson. 2004. Morphological and behavioral defenses in dragonfly larvae: trait compensation and cospecialization. Behavioral Ecology 15:614-620.
35. Miner, B. G., S. E. Sultan, S. G. Morgan, D. K. Padilla, and R. A. Relyea. 2005. Ecological consequences of phenotypic plasticity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20:685-692.
36. Noonburg, E. G., and R. M. Nisbet. 2005. Behavioural and physiological responses to food availability and predation risk. Evolutionary Ecology Research 7:89-104.
37. Noonburg, E. G., R. Nisbet, E. McCauley, W. Gurney, W. Murdoch, and A. de Roos. 1998. Experimental testing of dynamic energy budget models. Functional Ecology 12:211-222.
38. O'Keefe, T. C., M. C. Brewer, and S. I. Dodson. 1998. Swimming behavior of Daphnia: its role in determining predation risk. Journal of Plankton Research 20:973-984.
39. Pangle, K. L., and S. D. Peacor. 2006. Non-lethal effect of the invasive predator Bythotrephes longimanus on Daphnia mendotae. Freshwater Biology 51:1070-1078.
40. Peterson, W. T., and S. J. Ausubel. 1984. Diets and selective feeding by larvae of Atlantic mackerel Scomber scombrus on zooplankton. Marine Ecology Progress Series 17:65-75.
41. Pettersson, L. B., P. A. Nilsson, and C. Brönmark. 2000. Predator recognition and defence strategies in crucian carp, Carassius carassius. Oikos 88:200-212.
42. Pigliucci, M. 2003. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Ecology Letters 6:265-272.
43. Relyea, R. A. 2001. Morphological and behavioral plasticity of larval anurans in response to different predators. Ecology 82:523-540.
44. -. 2003. Predators come and predators go: the reversibility of predator-induced traits. Ecology 84:1840-1848.
45. -. 2004a. Fine-tuned phenotypes: tadpole plasticity under 16 combinations of predators and competitors. Ecology 85:172-179.
46. -. 2004b. Integrating phenotypic plasticity when death is on the line. Pages 176-190 in M. Pigliucci and K. Preston, eds. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
47. Rinke, K., S. Hülsmann, and W. M. Mooij. 2008. Energetic costs, underlying resource allocation patterns, and adaptive value of predator-induced life-history shifts. Oikos 117:273-285.
48. Roff, D. A. 2001. Age and size at maturity. Pages 99-112 in C. W. Fox, D. A. Roff, and D. J. Fairbairn, eds. Evolutionary ecology: concepts and case studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
49. Rundle, S. D., and C. Brönmark. 2001. Inter-and intraspecific trait compensation of defence mechanisms in freshwater snails. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 268:1463-1468.
50. Sarno, R. J., and A. A. Gubanich. 1995. Prey selection by wild American kestrels: the influence of prey size and activity. Journal of Raptor Research 29:123-126.
51. Shertzer, K. W., and S. P. Ellner. 2002. State-dependent energy allocation in variable environments: life history evolution of a rotifer. Ecology 83:2181-2193.
52. Snyder, R. L. 1975. Some prey preference factors for a red-tailed hawk. Auk 92:547-552.
53. Steiner, U. K., and T. Pfeiffer. 2007. Optimizing time and resource allocation trade-offs for investment into morphological and behavioral defense. American Naturalist 169:118-129.
54. Strand, E., G. Huse, and J. Giske. 2002. Artificial evolution of life history and behavior. American Naturalist 159:624-644.
55. Taylor, B. E., and W. Gabriel. 1992. To grow or not to grow: optimal resource allocation for Daphnia. American Naturalist 139:248-266.
56. Tollrian, R., and S. I. Dodson. 1999. Inducible defenses in cladocera: constraints, costs, and multipredator environments. Pages 177-202 in R. Tollrian and C. Harvell, eds. The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
57. Tollrian, R., and C. D. Harvell, eds. 1999. The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
58. Urban, M. 2007a. The growth-predation risk trade-off under a growing gape-limited predation threat. Ecology 88:2587-2597.
59. -. 2007b. Risky prey behavior evolves in risky habitats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104:14377-14382.
60. Utne-Palm, A. C. 2000. Prey visibility, activity, size and catchability's (evasiveness) influence on Gobiusculus flavescens prey choice. Sarsia 85:157-165.
61. Werner, E., and S. Peacor. 2003. A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84:1083-1100.
62. Werner, E. E., and B. R. Anholt. 1993. Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity. American Naturalist 142:242-272.
63. Werner, E. E., and J. F. Gilliam. 1984. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size structured populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15:393-425.
64. Wright, D. I., and W. J. O'Brien. 1982. Differential location of Chaoborus larvae and Daphnia by fish: the importance of motion and visible size. American Midland Naturalist 108:68-73.