Precise time interactions between behavioural and morphological defences

Oikos

Volumn 119, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 494-499

  Hammill, E ^a,b   Kratina, P ^a,b   Beckerman, A P ^c   Anholt, B R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b BAMFIELD MARINE SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; CHEMICAL CUE; CILIATE; FLATWORM; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MORPHOLOGY; PRECISION; PREDATION RISK; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

CILIOPHORA; EUPLOTES; EUPLOTES OCTOCARINATUS; HYPOTRICHIA; PLATYHELMINTHES; STENOSTOMUM VIRGINIANUM;

EID: 77955636950     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17812.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Altwegg, R. et al. 2006. Functional response and prey defence level in an experimental predator-prey system. - Evol. Ecol. Res. 8: 115-128.
2. Anholt, B. R. and Werner, E. E. 1995. Interaction between food availability and predation mortality mediated by adaptive behavior. - Ecology 76: 2230-2234.
3. Boersma, M. et al. 1998. Predator-mediated plasticity in morphology, life history, and behavior of Daphnia: the uncoupling of responses. - Am. Nat. 152: 237-248.
4. Brodie, E. D. I. 1992. Correlational selection for color pattern and antipredator behavior in the garter snake Thamnophis ordinoides. - Evolution 46: 1284-1298.
5. Brönmark, C. et al. 1999. Predator-induced defense in crucian carp. - In: Tollrian, R. (ed.), The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton Univ. Press, pp. 203-218.
6. De Meester, L. and Cousyn, C. 1996. The change in phototactic behaviour of a Daphnia magna clone in the presence of fish kairomones: the eff ect of exposure time. - 4th Int. Symp. on Cladocera, pp. 169-175.
7. Dewitt, T. J. et al. 1999. Trait compenstation and cospecialisation in a freshwater snail: size shape and antipredator behaviour. - Anim. Behav. 58: 397-407.
8. Duquette, S. L. et al. 2005. Factors aff ecting the expression of inducible defences in Euplotes: genotype, predator density and experience. - Funct. Ecol. 19: 648-655.
9. Hammill, E. et al. 2008. Costs, benefits and the evolution of inducible defences: a case study with Daphnia pulex. - J. Evol. Biol. 21: 705-715.
10. Hammill, E. et al. 2009. Non-lethal presence of predators modifies morphology and movement rates in Euplotes. - Hydrobiologia. 621: 183-189.
11. Jeschke, J. M. and Tollrian, R. 2000. Density-dependent eff ects of prey defences. - Oecologia 123: 391-396.
12. Kuhlmann, A. 1989. Adolescence in Euplotes octocarinatos. - J. Exp. Zool. 251: 316-328.
13. Kuhlmann, H. W. 1994. Escape response of Euplotes octocarinatus to turbellarian predators. - Arch. Protistenkd. 144: 163-171.
14. Kuhlmann, H. W. and Heckmann, K. 1994. Predation risk of typical ovoid and winged morphs of Euplotes (Protozoa, Ciliophora). - Hydrobiologia 284: 219-227.
15. Kusch, J. 1993. Behavioral and morphological changes in ciliates induced by the predator Amoeba proteus. - Oecologia 96: 354-359.
16. Kusch, J. and Kuhlmann, H. W. 1994. Cost of Stenostomum induced morphological defense in the ciliate Euplotes octocarinatus. - Arch. Hydrobiol. 130: 257-267.
17. McPeek, M. A. et al. 1996. Adaptation to predators in a new community: swimming performance and predator avoidance in damselflies. - Ecology 77: 617-629.
18. Mikolajewski, D. J. and Johansson, F. 2004. Morphological and behavioral defenses in dragonfly larvae: trait compensation and cospecialization. - Behav. Ecol. 15: 614-620.
19. Morin, P. 1999. Productivity, intraguild predation, and population dynamics in experimental food webs. - Ecology 80: 752-760.
20. Peacor, S. D. 2003. Phenotypic modifications to conspecific density arising from predation risk assessment. - Oikos 100: 409-415.
21. Rasband, W. S. 2006. Imagej 1.36. - In: US Natl Inst. of Heath (ed.). Bethesda.
22. Relyea, R. A. 2001. Morphological and behavioral plasticity of larval anurans in response to diff erent predators. - Ecology 82: 523-540.
23. Ringelberg, J. and Van Gool, E. 1995. Migrating Daphnia have a memory for fish kairomones. - Symp. on Sensory Ecology and Physiology of Zooplankton, pp. 249-257.
24. Rundle, S. D. and Brönmark, C. 2001. Inter- and intraspecific trait compensation of defence mechanisms in freshwater snails. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 1463-1468.
25. Skelly, D. K. 1992. Field evidence for a cost of behavioral antipredator response in a larval amphibian. - Ecology 73: 704-708.
26. Skelly, D. K. 1994. Activity level and the susceptibility of anuran larvae to predation. - Anim. Behav. 47: 465-468.
27. Tollrian, R. and Harvell, C. D. 1999. The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. - Princeton Univ. Press.
28. Van Buskirk, J. 2002. Phenotypic ability and the evolution of predator-induced plasticity in tadpoles. - Evolution 56: 361-370.
29. Van Buskirk, J. and McCollum, S. A. 2000. Functional mechanisms of an inducible defence in tadpoles: morphology and behaviour influ ence mortality risk from predation. - J. Evol. Biol. 13: 336-347.
30. Vos, M. et al. 2004. Inducible defences and the paradox of enrichment. - Oikos 105: 471-480.
31. West-Eberhard, M. J. 1989. Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 249-278.
32. Wiackowski, K. and Staronska, A. 1999. The eff ect of predator and prey density on the induced defence of a ciliate. - Funct. Ecol. 13: 59-65.