Swimming behavior of daphnia: Its role in determining predation risk

Journal of Plankton Research

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 973-984

  O'Keefe, Thomas C ^a,c   Brewer, Matthew C ^b   Dodson, Stanley I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; CLONE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENT; MODEL; PREDATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SIZE; SWIMMING;

PLANKTIVOROUS FISH; PREDATION RISK; PREY SELECTION; SWIMMING BEHAVIOUR; ZOOPLANKTON;

CLADOCERA; DAPHNIA;

EID: 0031860032     PISSN: 01427873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/20.5.973     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Black,A.R. (1991) Predator-induced phenotypic plasticity in Daphnia pulex. PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
2. Brewer,M.C. (1996) Daphnia swimming behavior and its role in predator-prey interactions. PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
3. Brewer,M.C. and Coughlin,J.N. (1996) Virtual plankton: a novel approach to the investigation of aquatic predator-prey interactions. In Lenz,P.H., Hartline,D.K., Purcell,J.E. and Macmillan,D.L. (eds), Zooplankton: Sensory Ecology and Physiology. Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam, pp. 425-134.
4. Brooks,J.L. and Dodson,S.I. (1965) Predation, body size, and the composition of the plankton. Science, 150, 28-35.
5. Buskey,E.J. (1994) Factors affecting feeding and selectivity of visual predators on the copepod Acartia tonsa: locomotion, visibility and escape responses. Hydrobiologia, 292/293, 447-453.
6. Buskey,E.J., Coulter,C. and Strom,S. (1993) Locomotory patterns of microzooplankton: potential effects of food selectivity of larval fish. Bull. Mar. Sci., 53, 29-43.
7. Carpenter,S.R., Kitchell,J.F. and Hodgson,J.R. (1985) Cascading trophic interactions and lake productivity. Bioscience, 35, 634-639.
8. Christoffersen,K., Riemann,B. and Klysner,A. (1993) The potential role of fish predation and natural populations of Zooplankton in structuring a plankton community in eutrophic lake water. Limnol. Oceanogr., 38, 561-573.
9. Colbourne,J.K. and Hebert,P.D.N. (1996) The systematics of North American Daphnia (Crustacea: Anomopoda): a phylogenetic approach. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B, 351, 349-360.
10. Confer,J.L. and Blades,P.I. (1975) Omnivorous Zooplankton and planktivorous fish. Limnol. Oceanogr., 20, 571-579.
11. DeMeester,L., Wieder,J. and Tollrian,R. (1995) Alternative antipredator defences and genetic polymorphism in a pelagic predator-prey system. Nature, 378, 483-485.
12. Dodson,S.I. and Ramcharan,C.W. (1991) Size-specific swimming behavior of Daphnia pulex. J. Plankton Res., 13, 1365-1379.
13. Dodson,S.I., Hanazato,T. and Gorski,P.R. (1994) Behavioral responses of Daphnia pulex exposed to carbaryl and Chaoborus kairomone. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 14, 43-50.
14. Dodson,S.I., Ryan,S., Tollrian,R. and Lampert,W. (1997) Individual swimming behavior of Daphnia: effects of food, light, and container size in four clones. J. Plankton Res., 19, 1537-1552.
15. Drenner,R.W. and McComas,S.R. (1980)The roles of zooplankter escape ability and fish size selectivity in the selective feeding and impact of planktivorous fish. In Kerfoot,W.C. (ed.). Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities. University Press of New England, Hanover.
16. Egger,D.M. (1977)The nature of prey selection by planktivorous fish. Ecology, 58, 46-59.
17. Freed,A.N. (1988) The use of visual cues for prey selection by foraging treefrogs (Hyla cinerea). Herpetologica, 44, 18-24.
18. Gerritsen,J. and Strickler,J.R. (1977) Encounter probabilities and community structure in zooplankton: a mathematical model. J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 34, 73-81.
19. Govoni,J.J., Hoss,D.E. and Chester,A.J. (1983) Comparative feeding of three species of larval fishes in the Northern Gulf of Mexico: Brevoortia patronus, Leiostomus xanthurus, and Micropogonias undulatus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 13, 189-199.
20. Hrbácek,J., Dvorakova,M., Korinek,V. and Prochazkova,L. (1961) Demonstration of the effect of the fish stock on the species composition of the Zooplankton and the intensity of metabolism of the whole plankton assemblage. Verh. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 14, 192-195.
21. Ivlev,V.S. (1961) Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes. Yale Universtiy Press, New Haven. CT, 302 pp.
22. Kerfoot,W.C. (1980) Commentary: Transparency, body size and prey conspicuousness. In Kerfoot,W.C. (ed.), Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities. University Press of New England, pp. 609-617.
23. Kerfoot,W.C. (1982) A question of taste: Crypsis and warning coloration in freshwater Zooplankton communities. Ecology, 63, 538-554.
24. Lampert,W. (1994) Phenotypic plasticity in the size at first reproduction in Daphnia magna. Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol., 25, 2362-2365.
25. Larsson,P. and Kleiven,O.T. (1996) Food search and swimming speed in Daphnia. In Lenz,P.H., Hartline,D.K., Purcell,J.E. and Macmillan,D.L. (eds), Zooplankton: Sensory Ecology and Physiology. Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam, pp. 375-387.
26. Main,K.L. (1985) The influence of prey identity and size selection of prey by two marine fishes. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 88, 145-152.
27. Mount,D.I. and Norberg,T.J. (1984)A seven-day life-cycle cladoceran toxicity test. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 3, 425-434.
28. Parejko,K. and Dodson,S.I. (1991) The evolutionary ecology of an antipredator reaction norm: Daphnia pulex and Chaoborus americanus. Evolution, 45, 1665-1674.
29. Prete,F.R. (1993) Stimulus configuration and location in the visual field affect appetitive responses by the praying mantis, Sphodromantis lineola (Burr.). Vis. Neurosci., 10, 997-1005.
30. Prete,F.R. and Mahaffey,R.J. (1993) Appetitive responses to computer-generated visual stimuli by the praying mantis Sphodromantis lineola (Burr.). Vis. Neurosci., 10, 669-679.
31. Prete,F.R., Placek,P.J., Wilson,M.A., Mahaffey,R.J. and Nemcek,R.R. (1993) Stimulus speed and order of presentation effect the visually released predatory behaviors of the praying mantis Sphodromantis lineola (Burr.). Brain Behav. Evol., 42, 281-294.
32. Ramcharan,C.W. and Sprules,W.G. (1989) Preliminary results from an inexpensive motion analyzer for free-swimming Zooplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr., 34, 457-462.
33. Sarno,R.J. and Gubanich,A.A. (1995) Prey selection by wild American kestrels: the influence of prey size and selectivity. J. Raptor Res., 29, 123-126.
34. Scott,A. (1987) Prey selection by juvenile cyprinids from running water. Freshwater Biol., 17, 129-142.
35. Smith,K.C. and Macagno,E.R. (1990) UV photoreceptors in the compound eye of Daphnia magna (Crustacea, Branchiopoda). A fourth spectral class in single ommatidia. J. Comp. Physiol., 166(A), 597-606.
36. Sorensen,K.H. and Sterner,R.W. (1992) Extreme cyclomorphosis in Daphnia lumholtzi. Freshwater Biol., 28, 257-262.
37. Systat (1992) SYSTAT for Windows: Statistics, Version 5 edn. Systat, Inc., Evanston, IL.
38. Werner,E.E. and Hall,D.J. (1974) Optimal foraging and the size selection of prey by the bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Ecology, 55, 1042-1052.
39. Wright,D.I. and O'Brien,W.J. (1982) Differential location of Chaoborus larvae and Daphnia by fish: The importance of motion and visible size. Am. Midl. Nat., 108, 68-73.
40. Wright,D.I. and O'Brien,W.J. (1984) The development and field test of a tactical model of the planktivorous feeding of white crappie (Pomoxis annularis). Ecol. Monogr., 54, 65-98.
41. Zar,J.H. (1996) Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
42. Zaret,T.M. (1980) The effect of prey motion on planktivore choice. In Kerfoot,W.C. (ed.), Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities. University Press of New England, pp. 594-603.