Income and outcome metrics for the objective evaluation of ERCP and alternative methods

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 56, Issue SUPPL. 6, 2002, Pages

  Cotton, Peter B ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; COMPETENCE; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; MORBIDITY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BILIARY TRACT DISEASES; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PANCREATIC DISEASES; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

EID: 0036998327     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mge.2002.129025     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Cotton PB. Therapeutic gastrointestinal endoscopy: problems in proving efficacy. N Engl J Med 1992;326:1626-8.
2. ASGE. Appropriate use of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:831-7.
3. Cotton PB, Denyer ME, Kreel L, Husband J, Meire HB, Lees W. Comparative clinical impact of endoscopic pancreatography, grey-scale ultrasonography and computed tomography (EMI scanning) in pancreatic disease: a preliminary report. Gut 1978;19:679-84.
4. Hebert RL, Palesch YY, Tarnasky PR, Aabakken L, Mauldin PD, Cotton PB. DDQ-15 health-related quality of life instrument for patients with digestive disorders. Health Service and Outcomes Research Methology Journal. 2001;2:137-56.
5. Cotton PB. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones (apples and oranges). Gut 1984;25:587-97.
6. Keat AS. The ASA classification of physical status: a recapitulation. Anesthesiology 1978;49:233-7.
7. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Zimmerman JE, Bergner M, Bastos PG, et al. The APACHE III prognostic system: risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 1991;100:1619-36.
8. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, Mackenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 1987;40:373-83.
9. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 1991;78:356-60.
10. Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG, Powell SJ. POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Br J Surg 1998;85:1217-20.
11. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, Fennerty MB, Lee JG, Bjorkman DJ, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:425-34.
12. Schutz SM, Abbott RM. Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:535-9.
13. Cotton PB. Live endoscopy demonstrations are great, but... Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:627-9.
14. ASGE. Quality and outcomes assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:827-30.
15. Cotton PB. How many times have you done this procedure, doctor? Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:522-3.
16. Freeman ML. Training and competence in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Reviews in Gastroenterol Disorders 2001;1:73-86.
17. Petersen BT. ERCP outcomes: defining the operators, experience, and environments. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:953-8.
18. Cotton PB, Mauldin P. Endoscopic research, outcomes and justification. In: Classen M, Tytgat GNJ, Lightdale C, editors. Gastroenterological endoscopy. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2002.
19. Cotton PB. Outcomes of endoscopy procedures: struggling towards definitions. Gastrointest Endosc 1994;40:514-8.
20. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RCG, Meyers WC, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991;37:383-93.
21. Cotton PB. Randomization is not the (only) answer: a plea for structured objective evaluation of endoscopic therapy. Endoscopy 2000;32:402-5.