Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 457-467

  Colton, Joshua B ^a   Curran, Colleen C ^a  

^a Minnesota Gastroenterology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; CANNULATION; CARDIOPULMONARY ARREST; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMUNITY CARE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTESTINE PERFORATION; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANOMETRY; MULTICENTER STUDY; ODDI SPHINCTER; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREATITIS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT RESPONSE; UNITED STATES;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BILIARY TRACT DISEASES; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FORECASTING; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX FACTORS; SPHINCTEROTOMY, ENDOSCOPIC; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 68949117517     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.11.022     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Freeman M.L., Nelson D.B., Sherman S., et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 335 (1996) 909-918
2. Masci E., Toti G., Mariani A., et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 96 (2001) 417-423
3. Freeman M.L., DiSario J.A., Nelson D.B., et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 54 (2001) 425-434
4. Loperfido S., Angelini G., Benedetti G., et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 48 (1998) 1-10
5. Vandervoort J., Soetikno R.M., Tham T.C., et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 56 (2002) 652-656
6. Christensen M., Matzen P., Schulze S., et al. Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 60 (2004) 721-731
7. Mehta S.N., Pavone E., Barkun J.S., et al. Predictors of post-ERCP complications in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Endoscopy 30 (1998) 457-463
8. Rabenstein T., Schneider H.T., Bulling D., et al. Analysis of the risk factors associated with endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques: preliminary results of a prospective study, with emphasis on the reduced risk of acute pancreatitis with low-dose anticoagulation treatment. Endoscopy 32 (2000) 10-19
9. Williams E.J., Taylor S., Fairclough P., et al. Risk factors for complications following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 39 (2007) 793-801
10. Freeman M.L. Adverse outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. [review]. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 2 (2002) 147-168
11. Baron T.H., Petersen B.T., Mergener K., et al. Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 63 (2006) S29-S34
12. Johanson J.F., Cooper G., Eisen G.M., et al. Quality assessment of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 56 (2002) 165-169
13. Schutz S.M., and Abbott R.M. Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data. Gastrointest Endosc 51 (2000) 535-539
14. Davies A.R., and Ware J.E. GHAA's Consumer Satisfaction Survey and User's Manual (1991), Group Health Association of America, Washington, DC
15. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. ASGE Patient Satisfaction Survey (modified from GHAA-9). Oak Brook, Ill: ASGE (1999)
16. Cotton P.B., Lehman G., Vennes J., et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37 (1991) 383-393
17. Ciocirlan M., and Ponchon T. Diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. [review]. Endoscopy 36 (2004) 137-146
18. Mazen J.M., Yoon E.J., Saadi A., et al. Trends in the utilization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol 102 (2007) 966-975
19. Alhayaf N., Lalor E., McKaigney J., et al. The clinical and cost impact of endoscopic ultrasound on ERCP in a tertiary referral center. [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) AB297
20. Catalano M.F., Geenen J.E., Schmalz M.J., et al. ERCP induced acute pancreatitis. Risk assessment based on diagnostic and specific therapeutic cases. [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 43 (1996) AB376
21. Tanner A.R. ERCP: present practice in a single region. Suggested standards for monitoring performance. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 8 (1996) 145-148
22. Vandervoort J., Tham T.C., Wong R.C., et al. Prospective study of post-ERCP complications following diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 43 (1996) AB401
23. Cavallini G., Tittobello A., Frulloni L., et al. Gabexate for the prevention of pancreatic damage related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. N Engl J Med 335 (1996) 919-923
24. Rolny P., Anderberg B., Ishe I., et al. Pancreatitis after sphincter of Oddi manometry. Gut 31 (1990) 821-824