eLearning 2.0 and new literacies: Are social practices lagging behind?

Interactive Learning Environments

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 203-218

  Lim, Wei Ying ^a   So, Hyo Jeong ^a   Tan, Seng Chee ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Elearning; Elearning 2.0 design conditions; New literacies; Socio technical transitory issues; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955360334     PISSN: 10494820     EISSN: 17445191     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2010.500507     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch. Available from: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/ ocuments/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf
2. Anderson, T. (2006). PLEs versus LMS: Are PLEs ready for prime time? Retrieved from http://terrya.edublogs.org/2006/01/09/ples-versus-lms-are-ples-ready-for-prime-time/
3. Anderson, T. (2008). Open educational resources plus social software: Threat or opportunity for Canadian higher education? Paper presented at the Canadian Society for the Study of Higher Education, University of British Columbia, Canada.
4. Bielaczyc, K. (2006). Designing social infrastructure: Critical issues in creating learning environments with technology. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 301-329.
5. Brown, J.S., & Adler, R.P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(1), 16-32.
6. Clark, W., Logan, K., Luckin, R., Mee, A., & Oliver, M. (2009). Beyond Web 2.0: Mapping the technology landscapes of young learners. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 56-69.
7. Cook, S.D.N., & Brown, J.S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organizational Science 10, 381-400.
8. Curtis, D.D., & Lawson, M.J. (2001). Exploring collaborative online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 5(1), 21-34.
9. Dick, W., & Cary, L. (1990). The systematic design of instruction (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins.
10. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
11. Dron, J. (2007). Designing the undesignable: Social software and control. Educational Technology & Society, 10, 60-71.
12. Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2009). Lost in social space: Information retrieval issues in Web 1.5. Journal of Digital Information, 10(2). Available from http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/443/280
13. Fessakis, G., Tatsis, K., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2008). Supporting "Learning by Design" activities using group blogs. Educational Technology & Society, 11, 199-212.
14. Greenhow, C. (2008). Connecting informal and formal learning experiences in the age of participatory media: Commentary on Bull et al. (2008). Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8, 187-194.
15. Harasim, L. (Ed.). (1993). Global networks: Computers and communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Hemmi, A., Bayne, S., & Landt, R. (2009). The appropriation and repurposing of social technologies in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 19-30.
17. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York, NY: NYU Press.
18. Kahn, R., & Kelner, D. (2005). Reconstructing technoliteracy: A multiple literacies approach. E-learning, 2, 238-251.
19. Keats, D., & Schmidt, J.P. (2007). The genesis and emergence of Education 3.0 in higher education and its potential for Africa [Electronic Version]. First Monday, 12. Retrieved from http://outreach.lib.uic.edu/www/issues/issue12_3/keats/
20. Kerawalla, L., Minocha, S., Kirkup, G., & Conole, G. (2009). An empirically grounded framework to guide blogging in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25,31-42.
21. Kitchen, D., & McDougall, D. (1998). Collaborative learning on the Internet. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 27, 245-258.
22. Kupiainen, R., Suoranta, J., & Vaden, T. (2007). Fire next time: Or revisioning higher education in the context of digital social creativity. E-Learning, 4, 128-137.
23. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). Blogging as participation: The active sociality of a new literacy. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
24. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2007). Sampling "the new" in new literacies. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 1-24). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
25. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1999). Legitimate peripheral participation in the communities of practice. In R. McCormick & C. Paechter (Eds.), Learning and knowledge (pp. 21-35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
26. Leuhmann, A.L. (2008). Using blogging in support of teacher professional identity development: A case study. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 287-337.
27. Lipponen, L., Hakkarainen, K., & Paavola, S. (2004). Practices and orientations of CSCL. In J.W. Strijbos, P.A. Kirschner, & R.L. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL and implementing it in higher education (pp. 34-50). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
28. Marsh, J. (2007). New literacies and old pedagogies: Recontextualizing rules and practices. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11, 267-281.
29. Moore, M.G. (2007). Web 2.0: Does it really matter? The American Journal of Distance Education, 21, 177-183.
30. Paulus, T.M. (2005). Collaborative and cooperative approaches to online group work: The impact of task type. Distance Education, 26, 111-125.
31. Rollett, H., Lux, M., Strohmaier, M., Dosinger, G., & Tochtermann, K. (2007). The Web 2.0 way of learning with technologies. International Journal of Learning Technology, 3, 87-107.
32. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14, 51-70.
33. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In J.W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (pp. 1370-1373). New York, NY: Macmillan Reference.
34. Selwyn, N. (2007). Web 2.0 applications as alternative environments for informal learning - A critical review. Paper presented at the OECD-KERIS expert meeting, Cheju Island, South Korea.
35. Street, B. (2003). What's new in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5, 77-91.
36. Thompson, J. (2007). Is education 1.0 ready for Web 2.0 students? Innovate, 3(4). Available from http://innovateonline.info/?view=article&id=393
37. Toulmin, S.E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Wheeler, S., Yeomans, P., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluating student-generated content for collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 987-995.