" Cognitive" visual acuity estimation based on the event-related potential P300 component

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 121, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1464-1472

  Heinrich, Sven P ^a   Marhöfer, David ^a   Bach, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; P300; Visual acuity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLURRED VISION; COGNITION; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENSORY CORTEX; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 77955269058     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.03.030     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Aldrich M.S., Alessi A.G., Beck R.W., Gilman S. Cortical blindness: etiology, diagnosis, and prognosis. Ann Neurol 1987, 21:149-158.
2. Almoqbel F., Leat S.J., Irving E. The technique, validity and clinical use of the sweep VEP. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2008, 28:393-403.
3. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. Guideline 5: Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 2006;23:107-10.
4. Bach M. The " Freiburg Visual Acuity Test" -Automatic measurement of the visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 1996, 73:49-53.
5. Bach M., Maurer J.P., Wolf M.E. VEP-based acuity assessment in normal vision, artificially degraded vision, and in patients. Br J Ophthalmol 2008, 92:396-403.
6. Black Jr JA, Kahol K, Kuchi P, Fahmy G, Panchanathan S. Characterizing the high-level content of natural images using lexical basis functions. In: Proceedings of the SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering. 2003. p. 378-91.
7. Bodis-Wollner I., Atkin A., Raab E., Wolkstein M. Visual association cortex and vision in man: pattern-evoked occipital potentials in a blind boy. Science 1977, 198:629-631.
8. Crevits L. Abnormal psychophysical visual perception in parkinson's disease patients. Acta Neurol Belg 2003, 103:83-87.
9. Duncan-Johnson C.C., Donchin E. On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 1977, 14:456-467.
10. Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 1979, 7:1-26.
11. Gish K., Shulman G.L., Sheehy J.B., Leibowitz H.W. Reaction times to different spatial frequencies as a function of detectability. Vision Res 1986, 26:745-747.
12. Hansenne M. Le potentiel évoqué cognitif P300 (I): aspects théorique et psychobiologique. Neurophysiol Clin 2000, 30:191-210.
13. Hansenne M. Le potentiel évoqué cognitif P300 (II): variabilité interindividuelle et application clinique en psychopathologie. Neurophysiol Clin 2000, 30:211-231.
14. Heinrich S.P., Aertsen A., Bach M. Oblique effects beyond low-level visual processing. Vision Res 2008, 48:809-818.
15. Heinrich S.P., Andrés M., Bach M. Attention and visual texture segregation. J Vision 2007, 7(6):1-10.
16. Heinrich S.P., Bach M. Signal and noise in P300 recordings to visual stimuli. Doc Ophthalmol 2008, 117:73-83.
17. Heinrich S.P., Krüger K., Bach M. The effect of optotype presentation duration on acuity estimates revisited. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010, 248:389-394.
18. Heinrich S.P., Mell D., Bach M. Frequency-domain analysis of fast oddball responses to visual stimuli: a feasibility study. Int J Psychophysiol 2009, 73:287-293.
19. Henderson J.M., Hollingworth A. High-level scene perception. Annu Rev Psychol 1999, 50:243-271.
20. Howard J.E., Dorfman L.J. Evoked potentials in hysteria and malingering. J Clin Neurophysiol 1986, 3:39-49.
21. Ji J., Porjesz B., Begleiter H., Chorlian D. P300: The similarities and differences in the scalp distribution of visual and auditory modality. Brain Topogr 1999, 11:315-327.
22. Johnson R. A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology 1986, 23:367-384.
23. Jones M.J., Sinha P., Vetter T., Poggio T. Top-down learning of low-level vision tasks. Curr Biol 1997, 7:991-994.
24. Katayama J., Polich J. P300, probability, and the three-tone paradigm. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1996, 100:555-562.
25. Katayama J., Polich J. Auditory and visual P300 topography from a 3 stimulus paradigm. Clin Neurophysiol 1999, 110:463-468.
26. Kim K., Kim J., Yoon J., Jung K. Influence of task difficulty on the features of event-related potential during visual oddball task. Neurosci Lett 2008, 445:179-183.
27. Leek M.R. Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research. Percept Psychophys 2001, 63:1279-1292.
28. Linden D.E.J. The P300: Where in the brain is it produced and what does it tell us?. Neuroscientist 2005, 11:563-576.
29. Lorenz J., Kunze K., Bromm B. Differentiation of conversive sensory loss and malingering by P300 in a modified oddball task. Neuroreport 1998, 9:187-191.
30. Lupp U., Hauske G., Wolf W. Perceptual latencies to sinusoidal gratings. Vision Res 1976, 16:969-972.
31. Mackay A.M., Bradnam M.S., Hamilton R., Elliot A.T., Dutton G.N. Real-time rapid acuity assessment using VEPs: development and validation of the step VEP technique. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008, 49:438-441.
32. McBain V.A., Robson A.G., Hogg C.R., Holder G.E. Assessment of patients with suspected non-organic visual loss using pattern appearance visual evoked potentials. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007, 245:502-510.
33. McCarthy G., Donchin E. A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science 1981, 211:77-80.
34. Meigen T., Kley F. Die adaptive Bestimmung von Kontrastschwellen mit dem visuell evozierten Potenzial (VEP). Z Med Phys 2007, 17:24-33.
35. Mell D., Bach M., Heinrich S.P. Fast stimulus sequences improve the efficiency of event-related potential P300 recordings. J Neurosci Meth 2008, 174:259-264.
36. Mertens R., Allen J. The role of psychophysiology in forensic assessments: deception detection, ERPs, and virtual reality mock crime scenarios. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:286-298.
37. Musselwhite M.J., Jeffreys D.A. The influence of spatial frequency on the reaction times and evoked potentials recorded to grating pattern stimuli. Vision Res 1985, 25:1545-1555.
38. Nakamura A., Akio T., Matsuda E., Wakami Y. Pattern visual evoked potentials in malingering. J Neuroophthalmol 2001, 21:42-45.
39. Odom J.V., Hoyt C.S., Marg E. Effect of natural deprivation and unilateral eye patching on visual acuity of infants and children. Evoked potential measurements. Arch Ophthalmol 1981, 99:1412-1416.
40. Pazo-Alvarez P., Cadaveira F., Amenedo E. MMN in the visual modality: a review. Biol Psychol 2003, 63:199-236.
41. Picton T.W. The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J Clin Neurophysiol 1992, 9:456-479.
42. Polich J. Theoretical overview of P3a and P3b. Detection of change: event-related potential and fMRI findings 2003, 83-98. Kluwer Academic Press, Boston. J. Polich (Ed.).
43. Polich J. Clinical application of the P300 event-related brain potential. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2004, 15:133-161.
44. Polich J. Neuropsychology of P3a and P3b: a theoretical overview. Brainwaves and mind: recent developments 2004, 15-29. Kjellberg, Wheaton, IL. N.C. Moore, K. Arikan (Eds.).
45. Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol 2007, 118:2128-2148.
46. Potts G.F., Patel S.H., Azzam P.N. Impact of instructed relevance on the visual ERP. Int J Psychophysiol 2004, 52:197-209.
47. Pratap-Chand R., Sinniah M., Salem F.A. Cognitive evoked potential (P300): a metric for cerebral concussion. Acta Neurol Scand 1988, 78:185-189.
48. Rensink R.A. Change blindness: implications for the nature of visual attention. Vision & attention 2001, 169-188. Springer, New York. M. Jenkins, L. Harris (Eds.).
49. Rosenfeld J.P., Biroschak J.R., Kleschen M.J., Smith K.M. Subjective and objective probability effects on P300 amplitude revisited. Psychophysiology 2005, 42:356-359.
50. Rosenfeld J.P., Cantwell B., Nasman V.T., Wojdac V., Ivanov S., Mazzeri L. A modified, event-related potential-based guilty knowledge test. Int J Neurosci 1988, 42:157-161.
51. Rosenfeld J.P., Soskins M., Bosh G., Ryan A. Simple, effective countermeasures to P300-based tests of detection of concealed information. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:205-219.
52. Rousseff R.T., Tzvetanov P., Atanassova P.A., Volkov I., Hristova I. Correlation between cognitive P300 changes and the grade of closed head injury. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2006, 46:275-277.
53. Röver J., Bach M. Pattern electroretinogram plus visual evoked potential: a decisive test in patients suspected of malingering. Doc Ophthalmol 1987, 66:245-251.
54. Ruchkin D.S., Sutton S., Tueting P. Emitted and evoked P300 potentials and variation in stimulus probability. Psychophysiology 1975, 12:591-595.
55. Saitoh E., Adachi-Usami E., Mizota A., Fujimoto N. Comparison of visual evoked potentials in patients with psychogenic visual disturbance and malingering. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2001, 38:21-26.
56. Simons R.F., Graham F.K., Miles M.A., Chen X. On the relationship of P3a and the novelty-P3. Biol Psychol 2001, 56:207-218.
57. Soltani M., Knight R.T. Neural origins of the P300. Crit Rev Neurobiol 2000, 14:199-224.
58. Tartaglione A., Goff D.P., Benton A.L. Reaction time to square-wave gratings as a function of spatial frequency, complexity and contrast. Brain Res 1975, 100:111-120.
59. Teping C. Visubestimmung mit Hilfe des visuell evozierten kortikalen Potentials. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1981, 179:169-172.
60. Towle V.L., Harter M.R. Objective determination of human visual acuity: pattern evoked potentials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1977, 16:1073-1076.
61. Towle V.L., Sutcliffe E., Sokol S. Diagnosing functional visual deficits with the P300 component of the visual evoked potential. Arch Ophthalmol 1985, 103:47-50.
62. Vassilev A., Mitov D. Perception time and spatial frequency. Vision Res 1976, 16:82-89.
63. Verleger R. On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology 1997, 34:131-156.
64. Verleger R., Paehge T., Kolev V., Yordanova J., Jaśkowski P. On the relation of movement-related potentials to the go/no-go effect on P3. Biol Psychol 2006, 73:298-313.
65. Villegas R.B., Ilsen P.F. Functional vision loss: a diagnosis of exclusion. Optometry 2007, 78:523-533.
66. Wang J.T., Young G.B., Connolly J.F. Prognostic value of evoked responses and event-related brain potentials in coma. Can J Neurol Sci 2004, 31:438-450.
67. Yeap S., Kelly S.P., Sehatpour P., Magno E., Garavan H., Thakore J.H., et al. Visual sensory processing deficits in schizophrenia and their relationship to disease state. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2008, 258:305-316.