Attention and visual texture segregation

Journal of Vision

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2007, Pages

  Heinrich, Sven P ^a   Andrés, Marta ^b   Bach, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; Cross modal interaction; Task; Texture segregation; Top down; Visual evoked potential

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34247160557     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/7.6.6     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Achim, A. (1995). Signal detection in averaged evoked potentials: Monte Carlo comparison of the sensitivity of different methods. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 96, 574-584. [PubMed]
2. American Encephalographic Society. (1994). Guideline thirteen: Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 11, 111-113. [PubMed]
3. Bach, M., & Meigen, T. (1990). Electrophysiological correlates of texture segmentation in human observers. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 31, 104.
4. Bach, M., & Meigen, T. (1992). Electrophysiological correlates of texture segregation in the human visual evoked potential. Vision Research, 32, 417-424. [PubMed]
5. Bach, M., & Meigen, T. (1999). Electrophysiological correlates of human texture segregation, an overview. Documenta Ophthalmologica, 95, 335-347. [PubMed]
6. Beer, A. L., & Röder, B. (2005). Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities: An event-related potential study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 1116-1130. [PubMed]
7. Caputo, G., & Casco, C. (1999). A visual evoked potential correlate of global figure-ground segmentation. Vision Research, 39, 1597-1610. [PubMed]
8. Casco, C., Grieco, A., Campana, G., Corvino, M. P., & Caputo, G. (2005). Attention modulates psychophysical and electrophysiological response to visual texture segmentation in humans. Vision Research, 45, 2384-2396. [PubMed]
9. Di Russo, F., & Spinelli, D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for an early attentional mechanism in visual processing in humans. Vision Research, 39, 2975-2985. [PubMed]
10. Fable, M., Quenzer, T., Braun, C., & Spang, K. (2003). Feature-specific electrophysiological. correlates of texture segregation. Vision Research, 43, 7-19. [PubMed]
11. Hillyard, S. A., & Anllo-Vento, L. (1998). Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 781-787. [PubMed] [Article]
12. Hillyard, S. A., & Kutas, M. (1983). Electrophysiology of cognitive processing. Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 33-61. [PubMed]
13. Hoshiyama, M., & Kakigi, R. (2001). Effects of attention on pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials: Foveal field stimulation versus peripheral field stimulation. Brain Topography, 13, 293-298. [PubMed]
14. Johnson, J. A., & Zatorre, R. J. (2006). Neural substrates for dividing and focusing attention between simultaneous auditory and visual events. Neuroimage, 31, 1673-1681. [PubMed]
15. Julesz, B. (1981a). A theory of preattentive texture discrimination based on first-order statistics of textons. Biological Cybernetics, 41, 131-138. [PubMed]
16. Julesz, B. (1981b). Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions. Nature, 290, 91-97. [PubMed]
17. Kastner, S., De Weerd, P., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2000). Texture segregation in the human visual cortex: A functional MRI study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 83, 2453-2457. [PubMed] [Article]
18. Kastner, S., & Pinsk, M. A. (2004). Visual attention as a multilevel selection process. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 483-500. [PubMed]
19. Kastner, S., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2000). Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 315-341. [PubMed]
20. Kawashima, R., O'Sullivan, B. T., & Roland, P. E. (1995). Positron-emission tomography studies of cross-modality inhibition in selective attentional tasks: Closing the "mind's eye". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 92, 5969-5972. [PubMed] [Article]
21. Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22. Khoe, W., Freeman, E., Woldorff, M. G., & Mangun, G. R. (2006). Interactions between attention and perceptual grouping in human visual cortex. Brain Research, 1078, 101-111. [PubMed]
23. Lachapelle, J., Ouimet, C., Bach, M., Ptito, A., & McKerral, M. (2004). Texture segregation in traumatic brain injury - A VEP study. Vision Research, 44, 2835-2842. [PubMed]
24. Lamme, V. A., Van Dijk, B. W., & Spekreijse, H. (1992). Texture segregation is processed by primary visual cortex in man and monkey. Evidence from VEP experiments. Vision Research, 32, 797-807. [PubMed]
25. Lamme, V. A., Zipser, K., & Spekreijse, H. (1998). Figure-ground activity in primary visual cortex is suppressed by anesthesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 3263-3268. [PubMed] [Article]
26. Lamme, V. A., Zipser, K., & Spekreijse, H. (2002). Masking interrupts figure-ground signals in V1. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1044-1053. [PubMed]
27. Luck, S. J. (2005). The operation of attention - Millisecond by millisecond - Over the first half second. In H. Ogmen & B. G. Breitmeyer (Eds.), The first half second: The microgenesis and temporal dynamics of unconscious and conscious visual processes (chap. 11, pp. 187-206). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1996). Mechanisms and models of selective attention. In M. D. Rugg & G. H. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition (vol. 25, chap. 3, pp. 40-85). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxford Psychology Series.
29. Meigen, T., Kastner, S., & Bach, M. (1997). Texture segregation and orientation gradients: A comparison of electrophysiological and psychophysical thresh-old detection. In N. Elsner & H. Wassle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Göttingen Neurobiology Conference (vol. 2). Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag.
30. Most, S. B., Scholl, B. J., Clifford, E. R., & Simons, D. J. (2005). What you see is what you set: Sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. Psychological Review, 112, 217-242. [PubMed]
31. Reynolds, J. H., & Chelazzi, L. (2004). Attentional modulation of visual processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 611-647. [PubMed]
32. Roelfsema, P. R. (2006). Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 29, 203-227. [PubMed]
33. Schira, M. M., Fahle, M., Donner, T. H., Kraft, A., & Brandt, S. A. (2004). Differential contribution of early visual areas to the perceptual process of contour processing. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91, 1716-1721. [PubMed] [Article]
34. Schmitt, C., Janz, C., Hennig, J., & Bach, M. (1998). Representation of contours in human visual cortex. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Meeting of the ISMRM (p. 1539). Berkeley, CA: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
35. Scholte, H. S., Witteveen, S. C., Spekreijse, H., & Lamme, V. A. (2006). The influence of inattention on the neural correlates of scene segmentation. Brain Research, 1076, 106-115. [PubMed]
36. Schubö, A., Meinecke, C., & Schröger, E. (2001). Automaticity and attention: Investigating automatic processing in texture segmentation with event-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 11, 341-361. [PubMed]
37. Serences, J. T., & Yantis, S. (2006). Selective visual attention and perceptual coherence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 38-45. [PubMed]
38. Shams, L., Iwaki, S., Chawla, A., & Bhattacharya, J. (2005). Early modulation of visual cortex by sound: an MEG study. Neuroscience Letters, 378, 76-81. [PubMed]
39. Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., Thompson, S., & Shimojo, S. (2001). Sound alters visual evoked potentials in humans. Neuroreport, 12, 3849-3852. [PubMed]
40. Skiera, G., Petersen, D., Skalej, M., & Fahle, M. (2000). Correlates of figure-ground segregation in fMRI. Vision Research, 40, 2047-2056. [PubMed]