Influence of task difficulty on the features of event-related potential during visual oddball task

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 445, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 179-183

  Kim, Kyung Hwan ^a   Kim, Ja Hyun ^a   Yoon, Jin ^a   Jung, Ki Young ^b  

^a Yonsei University Wonju   (South Korea)

^b Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Event related potential (ERP); Independent component analysis (ICA); P2; P300; Single trial ERP; Task difficulty; Visual oddball task

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ELECTRODE; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 53249083851     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bahramali H., Gordon E., Li W.M., Rennie C., and Wright J. Fast and slow reaction time changes reflected in ERP brain function. Int. J. Neurosci. 93 (1998) 75-85
2. Debener S., Makeig S., Delorme A., and Engel A.K. What is novel in the novelty oddball paradigm? Functional significance of the novelty P3 event-related potential as revealed by independent component analysis. Cogn. Brain Res. 22 (2005) 309-321
3. Donchin E., and Coles G.H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?. Behav. Brain Sci. 11 (1988) 357-374
4. Jaskowski P., and Verleger R. An evaluation of methods for single-trial estimation of P3 latency. Psychophysiology 37 (2000) 153-162
5. Jung T.-P., Makeig S., Westerfield M., Townsend J., Courchesne E., and Sejnowski T.J. Analysis and visualization of single-trial event-related potentials. Hum. Brain Mapp. 14 (2001) 166-185
6. Kok A. On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 557-577
7. Kramer A.F., Schneider W., Fisk A.D., and Donchin E. The effects of practice and task structure on components of the event-related brain potential. Psychophysiology 23 (1986) 33-47
8. Makeig S., Westerfield M., Jung T.-P., Covington J., Townsend J., and Sejnowski T.J. Functionally independent components of late positive event-related potential during visual spatial attention. J. Neurosci. 19 (1999) 2665-2680
9. McCarthy G., and Donchin E. A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science 211 (1981) 77-80
10. Potts G.F. An ERP index of task relevance evaluation of visual stimuli. Brain Cogn. 56 (2004) 5-13
11. Potts G.F., Liotti M., Tucker D.M., and Posner M.I. Frontal and inferior temporal cortical activity in visual target detection: evidence from high spatially sampled event-related potentials. Brain Topogr. 9 (1996) 3-14
12. Smulders F.T.Y., Kenemans J.L., and Kok A. A comparison of different methods for estimating single-trial P300 latencies. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophys. 92 (1994) 107-114
13. Verleger R. Event-related potentials and cognition: a critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3. Behav. Brain Sci. 11 (1988) 343-357