The source and significance of confusion in public goods experiments

B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Ferraro, Paul J ^a   Vossler, Christian A ^b  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

confusion; experimental design; identification; other regarding preferences; public goods

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955249756     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19351682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2202/1935-1682.2006     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Andreoni, J. 1990. Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving. The Economic Journal 100(401): 464-477.
2. Andreoni, J. 1995. Cooperation in Public-Goods Experiments: Kindness or Confusion? American Economic Review 85(4): 891-904.
3. Ashley, R., S. Ball, and C. Eckel. 2003. Analysis of Public Goods Experiments Using Dynamic Panel Regression Models. Working Paper, Department of Economics, Virginia Tech.
4. Burlando, R.M. and F. Guala. 2005. Heterogeneous Agents in Public Goods Experiments. Experimental Economics 8: 35-54.
5. Carpenter, J. 2004. When in Rome: Conformity and the Provision of Public Goods. Journal of Socio-Economics 33(4): 395-408.
6. Cason, T.N. and D. Friedman. 1999. Learning in Laboratory Markets with Random Supply and Demand. Experimental Economics 2(1): 77-98.
7. Charness, G., G.R. Frechette and J.H. Kagel. 2004. How Robust is Laboratory Gift Exchange? Experimental Economics 7: 189-205.
8. Chaudhuri, A., S. Graziano and S. Maitra. 2006 Social Learning and Norms in a Public Goods Experiment with Inter-generational Advice. Review of Economic Studies 73( 2): 357-380.
9. Chaudhuri, A. and T. Paichayontvijit. 2006. Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to a public good. Economics Bulletin 3(8): 1-14.
10. Chou, E., M. McConnell, R. Nagel, and C.R. Plott. 2009. The control of game form recognition in experiments: understanding dominant strategy failures in a simple two person 'guessing' game. Experimental Economics 12( 2): 159-179.
11. Cookson, R. 2000. Framing Effects in Public Goods Experiments. Experimental Economics 3(1): 55-79.
12. Cotten, S., P.J. Ferraro and C.A. Vossler. 2007. Can Public Goods Experiments Inform Policy? Intepreting results in the presence of confused subjects. In Environmental Economics, Experimental Methods, edited by T. Cherry, S. Kroll and J. Shogren. Routledge, pp.194-211.
13. Cox, J.C. and V. Sadiraj. 2007. Social Preferences and Voluntary Contributions to Public Goods. Public Finance Review 35(2): 311-322.
14. Croson, R., E. Fatas, and T. Neugebauer. 2005. Reciprocity, Matching and Conditional Cooperation in Two Public Goods Games. Economic Letters 87(1): 95-101.
15. Davis, D.D. and C.A. Holt. 1993. Experimental Economics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
16. Erev, I. and A.E. Roth. 1998. Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria. American Economic Review 88(4): 848-881.
17. Ferraro, P.J., D. Rondeau, and G.L. Poe. 2003. Detecting Other-regarding Behavior with Virtual Players. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 51: 99-109.
18. Fischbacher, U., Gächter S., Fehr E., 2001. Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a Public Goods Experiment. Economics Lett ers 71: 397-404.
19. Fischbacher, U. and S. Gächter. 2004. Heterogeneous Motivations and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Goods. Working Paper, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich.
20. Goeree, J., C. Holt, and S. Laury. 2002. Private Costs and Public Benefits: Unraveling the Effects of Altruism and Noisy Behavior. Journal of Public Economics 83: 255-276.
21. Greene, W.H. 2003. Econometric Analysis, fifth edition. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
22. Hey, J.D. 2005. Why We Should Not be Silent about Noise. Experimental Economics 8: 325-345.
23. Holt, C.A. and S.K. Laury. 2008. Theoretical Explanations of Treatment Effects in Voluntary Contributions Games. In C.R. Plott and V.L. Smith (eds.), Handbook of Results in Experimental Economics. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp 846-855.
24. Houser, D. and R. Kurzban. 2002. Revisiting Kindness and Confusion in Public Goods Experiments. American Economic Review 92(4): 1062-1069.
25. Houser, D. and R. Kurzban. 2005. An experimental investigation of cooperative types in human groups: A complement to evolutionary theory and simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102 (5): 1803-1807
26. Isaac, R.M., J. Walker, and S. Thomas. 1984. Divergent Evidence on Free Riding: An Experimental Examination of Possible Explanations. Public Choice 43: 113-149.
27. Johnson, E. J., C. Camerer, S. Sen and T. Rymon. 2002. Detecting Failures of Backward Induction: monitoring information search in sequential bargaining. Journal of Economic Theory 104: 16-47.
28. Keser, C., and F. van Winden. 2000. Conditional Cooperation and Voluntary Contributions to Public Goods. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 102(1): 23-39.
29. Laury, S.K. and L.O. Taylor. 2008. Altruism Spillovers: Are Behaviors in Context-free Experiments Predictive of Altruism Toward a Naturally Occurring Public Good? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 65(1): 9-29.
30. Ledyard, J. 1995. Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research. In J.H. Kagel and A.E. Roth eds, Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 111-194.
31. Levitt, S.D. and J.A. List. 2007. What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World? Journal of Economic Perspecti ves 21(2): 153-174.
32. Loewenstein, G. 1999. Experimental Economics from the Vatange-Point of Behavioural Economics. Economic Journal 109: F25-F34.
33. Mason, C.F. and O.R. Phillips. 1997. Mitigating the Tragedy of the Commons through Cooperation: An Experimental Evaluation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Managem ent 34: 148-172.
34. Oxoby, R.J. and J. Spraggon. Forthcoming. Ambient-Based Policy Instruments: The Role of Recommendations and Presentation. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.
35. Palfrey, T.P. and J.E. Prisbrey. 1997. Anomalous Behavior in Public Goods Experiments: How Much and Why? American Economic Review 87: 829-846.
36. Plott, C. and K. Zeiler. 2005. The Willingness to Pay-Willingness to Accept Gap, the 'Endowment Effect,' Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations. American Economic Review 95: 530-545.
37. Rege, M. and K. Telle. 2004. The Impact of Social Approval and Framing on Cooperation in Public Good Situations. Journal of Public Economics 88(7-8): 1625-1644.
38. Saijo, T. and H. Nakamura. 1995. The Spite Dilemma in Voluntary Contribution Mechanism Experiments. Journal of Conflict Resolution 39(3): 535-560.
39. Roth, A.E. and I. Erev. 1995. Learning in Extensive-Form Games: Experimental Data and Simple Dynamic Models in the Intermediate Term. Games and Economic Behavior 8: 164-212.
40. White, H. 1982. Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models. Econometrica 50(1): 1-25.