Using a fingertip tactile device to substitute kinesthetic feedback in haptic interaction

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6191 LNCS, Issue PART 1, 2010, Pages 125-130

  Prattichizzo, Domenico ^a   Pacchierotti, Claudio ^a   Cenci, Stefano ^b   Minamizawa, Kouta ^d   Rosati, Giulio ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^b ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^d KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

force rendering; stability; tactile display

Indexed keywords

FORCE FEEDBACK; HAPTIC INTERACTIONS; INTRINSICALLY SAFE; KINESTHETIC FEEDBACK; RIGID WALL; STABILITY ISSUES; TACTILE DEVICE; TACTILE DISPLAY; TACTILE FEEDBACK; TELEOPERATION SYSTEMS; VERTICAL STRESS; VIRTUAL WALLS; WEARABLE DEVICES;

AUTOMOBILE EXHIBITIONS; DISPLAY DEVICES; HAPTIC INTERFACES; MICE (COMPUTER PERIPHERALS);

SYSTEM STABILITY;

EID: 77955162904     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14064-8_19     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Okamura, A.M.: Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. Current Opinion in Urology 18, 1-6 (2008)
2. Colgate, J.E., Stanley, M., Brown, J.: Issues in the haptic display of tool use. In: Proceedings of 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 1995. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots, Pittsburgh, PA, vol. 3, pp. 140-145 (1995)
3. Aziminejad, A., Tavakoli, M., Patel, R.V., Moallem, M.: Stability and performance in delayed bilateral teleoperation: Theory and experiments. Control Engineering Practice 16, 1329-1343 (2008)
4. Hashtrudi-Zaad, K., Salcudean, S.: Transparency in time-delayed systems and the effect of local force feedback for transparent teleoperation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 18(1), 108-114 (2002)
5. Black, B., Book, W.: Dynamic compensating controller for passive haptic manipulators in teleoperation. In: Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Kobe, Japan, pp. 1485-1491 (2009)
6. Conti, F., Khatib, O.: A new actuation approach for haptic interface design. The International Journal of Robotics Research 28, 834-848 (2009)
7. Tavakoli, M., Patel, R.V., Moallem, M.: Haptic feedback and sensory substitution during telemanipulated suturing. In: Proceedings of the First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Pisa, Italy (2005)
8. Kitagawa, M., Dokko, D., Okamura, A.M., Yuh, D.D.: Effect of sensory substitution on suture manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 129, 151-158 (2005) (Pubitemid 40038108)
9. Schoonmaker, R.E., Cao, C.G.L.: Vibrotactile force feedback system for minimally invasive surgical procedures. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Taipei, Taiwan (2006)
10. Minamizawa, K., Prattichizzo, D., Tachi, T.: Simplified design of haptic display by extending one-point kinesthetic feedback to multipoint tactile feedback. In: IEEE Haptic Symposium, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA (2010)
11. Minamizawa, K., Fukamachi, S., Kajimoto, H., Kawakami, N., Tachi, S.: Gravity grabber: wearable haptic display to present virtual mass sensation. In: SIGGRAPH 2007: ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 emerging technologies, p. 8. ACM, New York (2007)
12. Rosati, G., Biondi, A., Cenci, S., Boschetti, G., Rossi, A.: A haptic system to enhance stability of heavy duty machines. In: Proc. of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress Exposition, Boston, Massachusetts (2008)
13. Zilles, C., Salisbury, J.: A constraint-based god-object method for haptic display. In: Proceedings of 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots, vol. 3 (1995)
14. Lam, T.M., Mulder, M., Van Paassen, M.M.: Haptic feedback in UAV tele-operation with time delay. Journal of Guidance, Control & Dynamics 31(6), 1728-1739 (2008)