Modes of speciation and the neutral theory of biodiversity

Oikos

Volumn 116, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 241-258

  Etienne, Rampal S ^a   Apol, M Emile F ^a   Olff, Han ^a   Weissing, Franz J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BIODIVERSITY; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); DISPERSAL; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EXTINCTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

EID: 33846456178     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15438.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abrams, P. A. 2001. A world without competition. - Nature 412: 858-859.
2. Alonso, D. et al. 2006. The merits of neutral theory. - Trends. Ecol. Evol. 21: 451-457.
3. Arnqvist, G. et al. 2000. Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97: 10460-10464.
4. Bell, G. 2001. Neutral macroecology. - Science 293: 2413-2418.
5. Brown, J. H. 2001. Toward a general theory of biodiversity. - Evolution 55: 2137-2138.
6. Bush, G. L. et al. 1977. Rapid speciation and chromosomal evolution in mammals. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 74: 3942-3946.
7. Chave, J. 2004. Neutral theory and community ecology. - Ecol. Lett. 7: 241-253.
8. Chave, J. and Leigh, E. H. 2002. A spatially explicit neutral model of b-diversity in tropical forests. - Theor. Popul. Biol. 62: 153-168.
9. Chave, J. et al. 2006. Comparing models of species abundance. - Nature 441: E1.
10. Clark, J. S. and McLachlan, J. S. 2003. Stability of forest biodiversity. - Nature 423: 635-638.
11. Cohen, J. E. 1968. Alternate derivations of a species-abundance relation. - Am. Nat. 102: 165-172.
12. Coyne, J. A. and Orr, H. A. 2004. Speciation. - Sinauer Associates.
13. De Mazancourt, C. 2001. Consequences of community drift. - Science 239: 1772.
14. Dieckmann, U. et al. (eds) 2004. Adaptive speciation. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
15. Dornelas, M. et al. 2006. Coral reef diversity refutes the neutral theory of biodiversity. - Nature 440: 80-82.
16. Emerson, B. C. and Kolm, N. 2005. Species diversity can drive speciation. - Nature 434: 1015-1017.
17. Etienne, R. S. 2005. A new sampling formula for neutral biodiversity. - Ecol. Lett. 8: 253-260.
18. Etienne, R. S. and Olff, H. 2005. Confronting different models of community structure to species-abundance data: a Bayesian model comparison. - Ecol. Lett. 8: 493-504.
19. Etienne, R. S. and Alonso, D. 2005. A dispersal-limited sampling theory for species and alleles. - Ecol. Lett. 8: 1147-1156.
20. Etienne, R. S. and Alonso, D. 2006. Neutral community theory: how stochasticity and dispersal-limitation can explain species coexistence. - J. Stat. Phys. In press. DOI: 10.1007/s10955-006-9163-2.
21. Etienne, R. S. et al. 2006a. Comment on "Neutral ecological theory reveals isolation and rapid speciation in a biodiversity hot spot". - Science 311: 610b.
22. Etienne, R. S. et al. 2006b. The zero-sum assumption in neutral biodiversity theory. Manuscript.
23. Ewens, W. J. 1972. The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. - Theor. Popul. Biol. 3: 87-112.
24. Fargione, J. et al. 2003. Community assembly and invasion: an experimental test of neutral versus niche processes. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100: 8916-8920.
25. Gavrilets, S. 2004. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. - Princeton Univ. Press.
26. Howard, D. J. and Berlocher, S. H. (eds) 1998. Endless forms: species and speciation. - Oxford Univ. Press.
27. Hubbell, S. P. 1979. Tree dispersion, abundance and diversity in a tropical dry forest. - Science 203: 1299-1309.
28. Hubbell, S. P. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. - Princeton Univ. Press.
29. Hubbell, S. P. 2003. Modes of speciation and the lifespans of species under neutrality: a response to the comment by Robert E. Ricklefs. - Oikos 100: 193-199.
30. Hubbell, S. P. and Lake, J. 2003. The neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography, and beyond. - In: Blackburn, T. and Gaston, K. (eds) Macroecology: patterns and processes. Blackwell, pp. 45-63.
31. Hu, X-S. et al. 2006. Neutral theory in macroecology and population genetics. - Oikos 113: 548-556.
32. Jablonski, D. and Roy, K. 2003. Geographical range and speciation in fossil and living molluscs. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 270: 401-406.
33. Jetschke, G. 2002. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. - Ecology 83: 1771-1772.
34. Joyce, P. 1995. Robustness of the Ewens sampling formula. - J. Appl. Probab. 32: 609-622.
35. Joyce, P. et al. 2003. When can one detect overdominant selection in the infinite-alleles model? - Ann. Appl. Probab. 13: 181-212.
36. Karlin, S. and McGregor, J. 1972. Addendum to a paper of W. Ewens. - Theor. Popul. Biol. 3: 113-116.
37. Kendall, R. G. 1948. On some modes of population growth giving rise to R.A. Fisher's logarithmic series distribution. - Biometrika 35: 6-15.
38. Kimura, M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
39. Kimura, M. and Ohta, T. 1973. The age of a neutral mutant persisting in a finite population. - Genetics 75: 199-212.
40. Losos, J. B. and Schluter, D. 2000. Analysis of an evolutionary species-area relationship. - Nature 408: 847-850.
41. Makarieva, A. M. and Gorshkov, V. G. 2004. On the dependence of speciation rates on species abundance and characteristic population size. - J. Biosci. 29: 119-128.
42. Magurran, A. E. and Henderson, P. A. 2003. Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributions. - Nature 422: 714-716.
43. Mayr, E. 1970. Populations, species and evolution. - Harvard Univ. Press.
44. McGill, B. J. 2003a. A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity. - Nature 422: 881-885.
45. McGill, B. J. 2003b. Strong and weak tests of macroecological theory. - Oikos 102: 679-685.
46. McPeek, M. A. and Miller, T. E. 1996. Evolutionary biology and community ecology. - Ecology 77: 1319-1320.
47. Moran, P. A. P. 1958. Random processes in genetics. - Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 54: 60-71.
48. Nee, S. 2005. The neutral theory of biodiversity: do the numbers add up? - Funct. Ecol. 19: 173-176.
49. Palmer, M. W. and Maurer, T. A. 1997. Does diversity beget diversity? A case study of crops and weeds. - J. Veg. Sci. 8: 235-240.
50. Poorter, L. et al. 2005. Beyond the regeneration phase: differentiation of height-light trajectories among tropical tree species. - J. Ecol. 93: 256-267.
51. Pueyo, S. 2006. Diversity: between neutrality and structure. - Oikos 112: 392-405.
52. Purves, D. W. and Pacala, S. W. 2005. Ecological drift in niche-structured communities: neutral pattern does not imply neutral process. - In: Burslem, D. et al. (eds), Biotic interactions in the tropics. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 107-138.
53. Ricklefs, R. E. 2003. A comment on Hubbell's zero-sum ecological drift model. - Oikos 100: 185-192.
54. Schluter, D. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiation. - Oxford Univ. Press.
55. Tavaré, S. and Ewens, W. J. 1997. Multivariate Ewens distribution. - In: Johnson, N. L. et al. (eds), Discrete multivariate distributions. Wiley, pp. 232-246.
56. Vallade, M. and Houchmandzadeh, B. 2003. Analytical solution of a neutral model of biodiversity. - Phys. Rev. E 68: 061902.
57. Vellend, M. 2003. Island biogeography of genes and species. - Am. Nat. 162: 358-365.
58. Vellend, M. 2005. Species diversity and genetic diversity: parallel processes and correlated patterns. - Am. Nat. 166: 199-215.
59. Van Doorn, G. S. et al. 2004. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection: a critical reevaluation. - Am. Nat. 163: 709-725.
60. Volkov, I. et al. 2005. Density dependence explains tree species abundance and diversity in tropical forests. - Nature 438: 658-661.
61. Watterson, 1974 and Watterson, G. A. 1974. and Wootton, J. T. 2005.Field parameterization and experimental test of the neutral theory of biodiversity.Nature.. Vol. 4332005: 97-159309312.
62. Wright, 1931 and Wright, S. 1931. and Wright, I. J. et al. 2004. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. - Nature 428: 821-827