A neutral metapopulation model of biodiversity in river networks

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 245, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 351-363

  Muneepeerakul, Rachata ^a   Weitz, Joshua S ^b   Levin, Simon A ^b   Rinaldo, Andrea ^c   Rodriguez Iturbe, Ignacio ^a  

^a Princeton University   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Directional dispersal; Metapopulation; Neutral; River network

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL DRIFT; DISPERSAL; EXTINCTION RISK; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; METAPOPULATION; POPULATION MODELING; RELATIVE ABUNDANCE; RIPARIAN VEGETATION; RIVER SYSTEM; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; STOCHASTICITY; VEGETATION DYNAMICS;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; DYNAMICS; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; METAPOPULATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIPARIAN ECOSYSTEM; RIPARIAN SPECIES; RIVER ECOSYSTEM; SIMULATION; SPECIES EXTINCTION; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

BIODIVERSITY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PLANTS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RIVERS;

EID: 33847050892     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Benda L., Poff N.L., Miller D., Dunne T., Reeves G., Pess G., and Pollock M. The network dynamics hypothesis: how channel networks structure riverine habitats. BioScience 54 5 (2004) 413-427
2. Bolker B.M. Combining endogenous and exogenous spatial variability in analytical population models. Theor. Popul. Biol. 64 3 (2003) 255-270 10.1016/S0040-5809(03)00090-X
3. Chave J., Muller-Landau H.C., and Levin S.A. Comparing classical community models: theoretical consequences for patterns of diversity. Am. Nat. 159 1 (2002) 1-23
4. Dodds P.S., and Rothman D.H. Unified view of scaling laws for river networks. Phys. Rev. E 59 5 (1999) 4865-4877
5. Fagan W.F. Connectivity, fragmentation, and extinction risk in dendritric metapopulations. Ecology 83 12 (2002) 3243-3249
6. Fernandes C.C., Podos J., and Lundberg J.G. Amazonian ecology: tributaries enhance the diversity of electric fishes. Science 305 (2004) 1960-1962
7. Gilbert F., Gonzalez A., and Evans-Freke I. Corridors maintain species richness in the fragmented landscapes of a microecosystem. Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 265 (1998) 577-582
8. Goebel P.C., Palik B.J., and Pregitzer K.S. Plant diversity contributions of riparian areas in watersheds of the Northern Lake States, USA. Ecol. Appl. 13 6 (2003) 1595-1609
9. Gregory S.V., Swanson F.J., McKee W.A., and Cummins K.W. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. Bioscience 41 8 (1991) 540-551
10. Hanski I.A. Metapopulation Ecology (1999), Oxford University Press, Oxford
11. In: Hanski I.A., and Gilpin M.E. (Eds). Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution (1997), Academic Press, San Diego
12. Hanski I.A., and Thomas C.D. Metapopulation dynamics and conservation: a spatially explicit model applied to butterflies. Biol. Conserv. 68 (1994) 167-180 10.1016/0006-3207(94)90348-4
13. Herring, M., 1997. Heath and Marjorie Angelo Coast Range Reserve (brochure for visitors). University of California Natural Reserve System.
14. Honnay O., Verhaeghe W., and Hermy M. Plant community assembly along dendritic networks of small forest streams. Ecology 82 6 (2001) 1691-1702
15. Horne A.J., and Goldman C.R. Limnology. second ed. (1994), McGraw-Hill, New York
16. Hubbell S.P. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (2001), Princeton University Press, Princeton
17. Johnson N.L., and Kotz S. Discrete Distributions (1969), Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA
18. Leopold L.B., Wolman M.G., and Miller J.P. Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology (1964), Freeman, New York
19. Levine J.M. Complex interaction in a streamside plant community. Ecology 81 12 (2000) 3431-3444
20. Levine J.M. Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. Science 288 (2000) 852-854
21. Levine J.M. A patch modeling approach to the community-level consequences of directional dispersal. Ecology 84 5 (2003) 1215-1224
22. Loreau M. Are communities saturated? On the relationship between α, β and γ diversity. Ecol. Lett. 3 (2000) 73-76
23. Lowrance R., Todd R., Fail Jr. J., Hendrickson Jr. O., Leonard R., and Asmussen L. Riparian forests as nutrient filters in agricultural watersheds. BioScience 34 6 (1984) 374-377
24. Malanson G.P. Riparian Landscapes (1993), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
25. McClain M.E., Boyer E.W., Dent C.L., Gergel S.E., Grimm N.B., Groffman P.M., Hart S.C., Harvey J.W., Johnston C.A., Mayorga E., McDowell W.H., and Pinay G. Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Ecosystems 6 (2003) 301-312
26. Moilanen A. Patch occupancy models of metapopulation dynamics: efficient parameter estimation using implicit statistical inference. Ecology 80 3 (1999) 1031-1043
27. Naiman R.J., and Décamps H. The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28 (1997) 621-658
28. Nilsson C., and Svedmark M. Basic principles and ecological consequences of changing water regimes: riparian plant communities. Environ. Manage. 30 4 (2002) 468-480
29. Nilsson C., Grelsson G., Johansson M., and Sperens U. Patterns of plant species richness along riverbanks. Ecology 70 1 (1989) 77-84
30. Nilsson C., Ekblad A., Dynesius M., Backe S., Gardfjell M., Carlberg B., Hellqvist S., and Jansson R. A comparison of species richness and traits of riparian plants between a main river channel and its tributaries. J. Ecol. 82 2 (1994) 281-295
31. Peterjohn W.T., and Correll D.L. Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology 65 5 (1984) 1466-1475
32. Rodriguez-Iturbe I., and Rinaldo A. Fractal River Basins: Chance and Self-organization (1997), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
33. Stauffer D., and Aharony A. Introduction to Percolation Theory. revised second ed. (1994), Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, London