The merits of neutral theory

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 451-457

  Alonso, David ^a   Etienne, Rampal S ^b   McKane, Alan J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ECOLOGICAL THEORY; NICHE;

ANIMAL; ECOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; REVIEW; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; ECOLOGY; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33745988218     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.019     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Darwin C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (1859), John Murray
2. Hubbell S.P. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (2001), Princeton University Press
3. Yu D.W., et al. Can high tree species richness be explained by Hubbell's null model. Ecol. Lett. 1 (1998) 193-199
4. Condit R., et al. Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science 295 (2002) 666-669
5. Clark J.S., and McLachlan J.S. Stability of forest biodiversity. Nature 423 (2003) 635-638
6. Magurran A.E., and Henderson P.A. Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributions. Nature 422 (2003) 714-716
7. McGill B.J. A test of the unified theory of biodiversity. Nature 422 (2003) 881-885
8. Fuentes M. Slight differences among individuals and the unified neutral theory of biodiversity. Theor. Popul. Biol. 66 (2004) 199-203
9. Turnbull L.A., et al. Niches, rather than neutrality, structure a grassland pioneer guild. Proc. R. Soc. B 272 (2005) 1357-1364
10. Harpole W., and Tilman D. Non-neutral patterns of species abundance in grassland communities. Ecol. Lett. 9 (2006) 15-23
11. Solé R.V., et al. Self-organized instability in complex ecosystems. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 357 (2002) 667-681
12. Lande R., et al. Stochastic Population Dynamics in Ecology and Conservation (2003), Oxford University Press
13. Ricklefs R.E. A comment on Hubbell's zero-sum ecological drift model. Oikos 100 (2003) 185-192
14. Adler P.B. Neutral models fail to reproduce observed species-time and species-area relationships in Kansas grasslands. Ecology 85 (2004) 1265-1272
15. Wootton J.T. Field parametrization and experimental test of the neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature 433 (2005) 309-312
16. Volkov I., et al. Density dependence explains tree species abundance and diversity in tropical forests. Nature 438 (2005) 658-661
17. Etienne R.S., and Alonso D. A dispersal-limited sampling theory for species and alleles. Ecol. Lett. 8 (2005) 1147-1156 Etienne, R.S. and Alonso, D. (2006). Erratum. 9, 500
18. Maurer B.A. Untangling Ecological Complexity (1999), University of Chicago Press
19. Levin S.A. Complex adaptive systems: exploring the known, the unknown, and the unknowable. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 40 (2003) 3-19
20. Ewens W.J. The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. Theor. Popul. Biol. 3 (1972) 87-112
21. Cleaments F.E. Plant Succession: Analysis of the Development of the Vegetation (1916), Carnegie Institution of Washington
22. MacArthur R.H., and Wilson E.O. The Theory of Island Biogeography (1967), Princeton University Press
23. Kimura M., and Crow J.F. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49 (1964) 725-738
24. Chave J. Neutral theory and community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 7 (2004) 241-253
25. Watterson G.A. Models for the logarithmic species abundance distribution. Theor. Popul. Biol. 6 (1974) 217-250
26. Caswell H. Community structure: a neutral model analysis. Ecol. Monogr. 46 (1976) 327-354
27. Leigh Jr. E.G., et al. The decline of tree diversity on newly isolated tropical islands: a test of a null hypothesis and some implications. Evol. Ecol. 7 (1993) 76-102
28. Hubbell S.P. Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence. Funct. Ecol. 19 (2005) 166-172
29. Etienne R.S., and Olff H. Bayesian analysis of species abundance data: assessing the relative importance of dispersal and niche-partitioning for the maintenance of biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 8 (2005) 493-504
30. Hubbell S.P. Tree dispersion, abundance and diversity in a tropical dry forest. Science 203 (1979) 1299-1309
31. Volkov I., et al. Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology. Nature 424 (2003) 1035-1037
32. McGill, B.J. Empirical evaluation of neutral theory. Ecology (in press)
33. Etienne R.S. A new sampling formula for neutral biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 8 (2005) 253-260
34. Fisher R.A., et al. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. J. Anim. Ecol. 12 (1943) 42-58
35. Alonso D., and McKane A.J. Sampling Hubbell's neutral theory of biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 7 (2004) 901-910
36. Latimer A.M., et al. Neutral ecological theory reveals isolation and rapid speciation in a biodiversity hot spot. Science 309 (2005) 1722-1725
37. Pueyo S. Diversity: between neutrality and structure. Oikos 112 (2006) 392-405
38. Chave J., et al. Comparing classical community models: theoretical consequences for patterns of diversity. Am. Nat. 159 (2002) 1-23
39. Purves D.W., and Pacala S.W. Ecological drift in niche-structured communities: neutral pattern does not imply neutral process. In: Burslem D., et al. (Ed). Biotic Interactions in the Tropics (2006), Cambridge University Press 107-138
40. Nisbet R.M., and Gurney W.S.C. Modelling Fluctuating Populations (1982), John Wiley & Sons
41. Durrett R., and Levin S. The importance of being discrete (and spatial). Theor. Popul. Biol. 46 (1994) 363-394
42. De Roos A.M., and Persson L. Unstructured populations models: do population-level assumptions yield general theory?. In: Cuddington K., and Beisner B. (Eds). Ecological Paradigms Lost. Routes of Theory Change (2005), Elsevier 31-62
43. Chesson P.L., and Warner R.R. Environmental variability promotes coexistence in lottery competitive systems. Am. Nat. 117 (1981) 923-943
44. Engen S., and Lande R. Population dynamics models generating species abundance distributions of the gamma type. J. Theor. Biol. 178 (1996) 325-331
45. Solé R.V., et al. Scaling in a network model of multispecies communities. Physica A 286 (2000) 337-344
46. McKane A., et al. Mean-field stochastic theory for species rich assembled communities. Phys. Rev. E 62 (2000) 8466-8484
47. Tilman D. Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (2004) 10854-10861
48. Bell G. The distribution of abundance in neutral communities. Am. Nat. 155 (2000) 606-617
49. Diserud O.H., and Engen S. A general and dynamic species abundance model, embracing the lognormal and the gamma models. Am. Nat. 155 (2000) 497-511
50. Williamson M., and Gaston K. The lognormal distribution is not an appropriate null hypothesis for the species-abundance distribution. J. Anim. Ecol. 74 (2005) 409-422
51. Preston F.W. The commonness and rarity of species. Ecology 29 (1948) 254-283
52. Pielou E.C. An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology (1969), John Wiley & Sons
53. Bulmer M.G. On fitting the Poisson lognormal distribution to species abundance data. Biometrics 30 (1974) 101-110
54. Dewdney A.K. A general theory of the sampling process with applications to the veil line. Theor. Popul. Biol. 54 (1998) 294-302
55. Vallade M., and Houchmandzadeh B. Analytic solution of a neutral model of biodiversity. Phys. Rev. E 68 (2003) 061902
56. Etienne R.S., and Olff H. A novel genealogical approach to neutral biodiversity theory. Ecol. Lett. 7 (2004) 170-175
57. McKane A.J., et al. Analytical solution to Hubbell's neutral model of local community dynamics. Theor. Popul. Biol. 65 (2004) 67-73
58. He F. Deriving a neutral model of species abundance from fundamental mechanisms of population dynamics. Funct. Ecol. 19 (2005) 187-193
59. Chave J., and Leigh E.G. A spatially explicit neutral model of β-diversity in tropical forests. Theor. Popul. Biol. 62 (2002) 153-168
60. Houchmandzadeh B., and Vallade M. Clustering in neutral ecology. Phys. Rev. E68 (2003) 061912
61. He F., and Hubbell S.P. Percolation theory for the distribution and abundance of species. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 198103
62. Tilman D. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75 (1994) 2-16
63. Etienne R.S., and Olff H. How dispersal limitation shapes species-body size distributions in local communities. Am. Nat. 163 (2004) 68-83
64. Wakeley J. Recent trends in population genetics: more data! More math! Simple models? J. Hered. 95 (2004) 397-405
65. Magurran A.E. Measuring Biological Diversity (2004), Blackwell
66. Margalef R. Through the looking glass: how marine phytoplankton appears through the microscope when graded by size and taxonomically sorted. Sci. Mar. 58 (1994) 87-101
67. Tilman D., et al. Habitat destruction and extinction debt. Nature 371 (1994) 65-66
68. Solé R.V., et al. Habitat fragmentation and biodiversity collapse in neutral communities. Ecol. Complex. 1 (2004) 65-75
69. Gause G.F. The Struggle for Existence (1934), Hafner Press
70. Tilman D. Resource Competition and Community Structure (1982), Princeton University Press
71. Rannala B. The sampling theory of neutral alleles in an island population of fluctuating size. Theor. Popul. Biol. 50 (1996) 91-104