An EPG study of initial /kl/ clusters in varying prosodic conditions in German

ISSP 2006 - Proceedings of the 7th International Seminar on Speech Production

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 35-42

  Bombien, Lasse ^a   Mooshammer, Christine ^b   Hoole, Phil ^a   Kühnert, Barbara ^c   Schneeberg, Jennifer ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITÉ SORBONNE NOUVELLE PARIS 3   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY STRENGTHS; PROSODIC BOUNDARY;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84874894133     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Beckman, M. and Edwards, J. Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories. In Keating, P., editor, Papers in Laboratory Phonology 3: Phonlogical Structure und Phonetic form, pages 7-33. University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
2. Browman, C. and Goldstein, L. Competing constraints on intergestural coordination and self-organization of phonological structure. Les Cahiers de l'ICP, 5:25-34, 2000.
3. Byrd, D. and Choi, S. At the juncture of prosody, phonology, and phonetics?the interaction of phrasal and syllable structure in shaping the timing of consonant gestures. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Laboratory Phonology, Paris, June 2006.
4. Byrd, D., Flemming, E., Mueller, C. A., and Tan, C. C. Using regions and indices in EPG data reduction. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38:821-827, August 1995.
5. Byrd, D. and Saltzman, E. The elastic phrase: Modeling the dynamics of boundaryadjacent lengthening. Journal of Phonetics, 31(2):149-180, 2003.
6. Cassidy, S. and Harrington, J. Emu: an enhanced hierarchical speech data management system. In McCormack, P. and Russels, A., editors, Proceedings of the Sixth Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, pages 361-366, Adelaide, 1996. ASSTA.
7. Chitoran, I., Goldstein, L., and Byrd, D. Gestural overlap and recoverability: Articultory evidence from Georgian. In Gussenhoven, C. and Warner, N., editors, Laboratory Phonology 7. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, 2002.
8. Cho, T. and McQueen, J. M. Prosodic influences on consonant production in Dutch: Effects of prosodic boundaries, phrasal accent and lexical stress. Journal of Phonetics, 33(2):121-157, 2005.
9. Fougeron, C. Variations articulatoires en début de constituants prododiques de différents niveaux en français. Thèse de doctorat, Universit Paris III, 1998.
10. Gafos, A. A grammar of gestural coordination. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20(2):169-337, 2002.
11. Hardcastle, W. J. Some phonetic and syntactic constraints on lingual coarticulation during/kl/sequences. Speech Communication, 4:247-263, 1985.
12. Hardcastle, W. J., Jones, W., Knight, C., Trudgeon, A., and Calder, G. New developments in electropalatography: A state-of-the-art report. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 3(1):1-38, 1989.
13. Keating, P., Cho, T., Fougeron, C., and Hsu, C. Domain-initial articulatory strengthening in four languages. In Local, J., Ogden, R., and Temple, R., editors, Papers in Laboratory Phonology 6: Phonetic interpretation, pages 143-161. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.
14. Keating, P. and Cho, T. Influence of prosodic factors on segment articulations and acoustics in English. Poster presented at October ASA meeting in Minneapolis, 2005.
15. Kühnert, B. and Hoole, P. Cohésion temporelle dans les groupes C1/l/initiaux en français. In Actes des XXVIes Journées d'Etude sur la Parole, pages 545-548., 2006.
16. Lindblom, B. Explainig phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In Hardcastle, W. J. and Marchal, A., editors, Speech Production and Speech Modelling, pages 403-439. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990.
17. Mooshammer, C. and Harrington, J. Linguistic prominence and loudness: a systematic comparison between lexical word stress, sentence accent and vocal effort, 2005.
18. Mooshammer, C. and Fuchs, S. Stress distinction in German: Simulating kinematic parameters of tongue tip gestures. Journal of Phonetics, 30:337-355, 2002.
19. Schiel, F. Automatic phonetic transcription of non-prompted speech. In Proceedings of the 14. International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pages 607-610, San Francisco, August 1999.
20. Turk, A. and White, L. Structural influences on accentual lenghtening in English. Journal of Phonetics, 27:171-206, 1999.
21. Wright, R. A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. In Hayes, B., Kirchner, R., and Steriade, D., editors, Phonetically Based Phonology, pages 34-57. Cambridge University Press, 2004.