Gestural overlap and recoverability: Articulatory evidence from Georgian

Laboratory Phonology 7

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 419-448

  Chitoran, Ioana ^a   Goldstein, Louis ^b,c   Byrd, Dani ^c,d  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064223560     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1515/9783110197105     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Browman, C. & Goldstein, L. 1990 Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In J. Kingston & M. E. Beckman (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech, (pp. 341-376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Browman, C. & Goldstein, L. in press Competing constraints on intergestural coordination and self-organization of phonological structures. Bulletin de la Communication Parlée, 5, 24-34.
3. Byrd, D. 1992 Perception of assimilation in consonant clusters: a gestural model. Phonetica, 49, 1-2 4.
4. Byrd, D. 1994 Articulatory Timing in English Consonant Sequences. PhD dissertation, UCLA, published as UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 86.
5. Byrd, D. 1996a Influences on articulatory timing in consonant sequences. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 209-244.
6. Byrd, D. 1996b A phase window framework for articulatory timing. Phonology, 13 Vol 2, 139-169.
7. Byrd, D. & Saltzman, E. 1998 Intergestural dynamics of multiple phrasal boundaries. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 173-199.
8. Chitoran, I. 1998 Georgian harmonic clusters: phonetic cues to phonological representation. Phonology, 15, 121-141.
9. Chitoran, I. 1999 Accounting for sonority violations: the case of Georgian consonant sequencing. Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco, 1999, 101-104.
10. Chitoran, I. 2000 Some evidence for feature specification constraints on Georgian consonant sequencing. In O. Fujimura, B. Joseph & B. Palek (eds.), Proceedings of LP '98, 185-204.
11. Gaitenby, J. 1965 The elastic word. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, 2.
12. Gamkrelidze, T. V. & Ivanov, V. 1995 Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans: A reconstruction and historical analysis of a Proto-Language and a Proto-Culture. (English version by Johanna Nichols). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
13. Gracco, V. L. & Nye, P. W. 1993 Magnetometry in speech articulation research: Some misadventures on the road to enlightenment. Forschungsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und Sprachliche Kommunikation der Universität München, 31.
14. Hardcastle, W. J. 1985 Some phonetic and syntactic constraints on lingual coarticulation during /kl/ sequences. Speech Communication, 4, 247-263.
15. Hardcastle, W. J. & Roach, P. 1979 An instrumental investigation of coarticulation in stop consonant sequences. In H. Hollien & P. Hollien (eds.), Current Issues in the Phonetic Sciences, (pp. 531-540). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16. Kelso, J. A. S, Saltzman, E. & Tuller, B. 1986 The dynamical perspective on speech production: data and theory. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 29-59.
17. Klatt, D. H. 1976 Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 1208-1221.
18. Liberman, A., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. & Studdert-Kennedy, M. 1967 Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431-461.
19. Löfqvist, A. 1993 Electromagnetic transduction techniques in the study of speech motor control. Reports from the Department of Phonetics, University of Umeá, PHONUM, 2, 87-106.
20. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. 1987 Functional Parallelism in Spoken Word-Recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102.
21. Mattingly, I. G. 1981 Phonetic representation and speech synthesis by rule. In T. Myers, J. Laver & J. Anderson (eds.), The Cognitive Representation of Speech, (pp. 415-420). North Holland Publishing Company.
22. McCoy, P. 1999 Harmony and sonority in Georgian. In Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco, 1999, 447-450.
23. Ohala, J. J. 1990 Alternatives to the sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental sequential constraints. Papers from the Chicago Linguistic Society, 26, Vol 2, The parasession on the syllable in phonetics and phonology, 319-338.
24. Ohala, J. J. & Kawasaki, H. 1984 Prosodie phonology and phonetics. Phonology Yearbook, 1,113-127.
25. Peng, Shu-Hui 1996 Phonetic Implementation and Perception of Place Coarticulation and Tone Sandhi. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.
26. Perkell, J., Cohen, M., Svirsky, M., Matthies, M., Garabieta, I. & Jackson, M. 1992 Electromagnetic midsagittal articulometer (EMMA) systems for transducing speech articulatory movements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 3078-3096.
27. Redford, M. A. & Diehl, R. L. 1999 The relative perceptual distinctiveness of initial and final consonants in CVC syllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 1555-1565.
28. Saltzman, E. & Byrd, D. 2000 Demonstrating effects of parameter dynamics on gestural timing. May 2000 Meeting of the ASA, Atlanta, GA. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, Vol 5, 2, 2904.
29. Silverman, D. & Jun, J. 1994 Aerodynamic evidence for articulatory overlap in Korean. Phonetica, 51, 210-220.
30. Silverman, D. 1995 Phasing and Recoverability. UCLA Ph.D dissertation, published by Garland Publishing, 1997.
31. Surprenant, A. M. & Goldstein, L. 1998 The perception of speech gestures. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, Vol 1, 518-529.
32. Wright, R. 1996 Consonant clusters and cue preservation in Tsou. PhD dissertation, UCLA. Dissertations in Linguistics, 20.
33. Zhgenti, S. 1956 Kartuli enis ponetika (Phonetics of the Georgian language). Tbilisi.
34. Zsiga, E. C. 1994 Acoustic evidence for gestural overlap in consonant sequences. Journal of Phonetics, 22, 121-140.