An organizational perspective on the origins of instructional segregation: School composition and use of within-class ability grouping in American kindergartens

Teachers College Record

Volumn 112, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1300-1337

  Buttaro Jr , Anthony ^a   Gatsambis, Sophia ^b   Mulkey, Lynn ^c,d   Steelman, Lala Garr ^e  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA BEAUFORT   (United States)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954803281     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Airasian, P. W., & Maddaus, G.F. (1983). Linking testing and instruction: Policy issues. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 103-118.
2. Barr, R., & Dreeben, R. (1983). How schools work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Braddock, J. H., II. (1990). Tracking in the middle grades: National patterns of grouping for instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 445-449.
4. Chorzempa, B. F., & Graham, S. (2006). Primary-grade teachers' use of within-class ability grouping in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 525-541.
5. Condron, D.J. (2008). An early start: Skill grouping and unequal reading gains in the elementary years. Sociological Quarterly, 49, 363-394.
6. Cullen, J. B., & Reback, R. (2006). Tinkering toward accolades: School gaming under a performance accountability system (Working paper). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
7. DeWolf, I. F., & Janssens, F. (2007). Effects and side effects of inspections and accountability in education: An overview of empirical studies. Oxford Review of Education, 33, 379-396.
8. Dreeben, R., & Barr, R. (1988a). Classroom composition and the design of Instruction. Sociology of Education, 61, 129-142.
9. Dreeben, R., & Barr, R. (1988b). The formation and instruction of ability groups. American Journal of Education, 97, 34-64.
10. Figlio, D. N., & Getzler, L. (2002). Accountability, ability and disability: Gaming the system (Working Paper). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
11. Friedkin, N. E., & Thomas, S. L. (1997). Social positions in schooling. Sociology of Education, 70, 239-255.
12. Gamoran, A., Nystrand, M., Berends, M., & LePore, P. C. (1995). An organizational analysis of the effects of ability grouping. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 687-715.
13. Gellman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Hallinan, M.T. (1991). School differences in tracking structures and track assignments. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 1, 251-275.
15. Hallinan, M. T. (1994). Tracking from theory to practice. Sociology of Education, 67, 79-84.
16. Hallinan, M. T., & Sorensen, A. (1983). The formation and stability of instructional groups. American Sociological Review, 48, 838-851.
17. Hallinan, M. X., & Sorensen, A. (1987). Ability groping and sex differences in mathematics achievement Sociology of Education, 60, 63-72.
18. Hill, P. T., & Guin, K. (2003). Baselines for assessment of choice programs. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 77(39), 1-32.
19. Kerckhoff, A. C., & Glennie, E. (1999). The Matthew effect in American education. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 12, 35-66.
20. Kilgore, S. B. (1991). The organizational context of tracking in schools. American Sociological Review, 56, 189-203.
21. Kubitschek, W. N., & Hallinan, M. T. (1996). Race, gender, and inequity in track assignments. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 11, 121-146.
22. Kulik, C. L., & Kulik, J. A. (1992). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 415-428.
23. Lee, V. E., & Loeb, S. (2003). School size in Chicago elementary schools: Effects on teachers' attitudes and students' achievement American Educational Research Journal, 37, 3-31.
24. Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & Spence, J. (2000). Effect of within-class grouping on student achievement An exploratory model. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 101-124.
25. Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J., Poulsen, C., Chamber, B., & D'Appolonia, S. (1996). Within-class ability grouping: A meta-analysis review. Review of Educational Research, 66, 423-1158
26. Lucas, S. R. (1999). Tracking inequality: Stratification and mobility in American high schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
27. Lucas, S. R., & Berends, M. (2002). Sociodemographic diversity, correlated achievement, and de facto tracking. Sociology of Education, 75, 328-348.
28. Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multi-level modeling. Methodology, 7(3), 86-92.
29. Marsh, H. W. (1984). Self-concept The application of a frame of reference model to explain paradoxical results. Australian Journal of Education, 28, 165-181.
30. Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect of academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 280-295.
31. McCoach, B. D. (2003). Does ability grouping matter? A cross-classified random effects model of children's reading growth over the first two years of school Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut
32. McCoach, D. B., O'Connell, A. A., & Levitt H. (2006). Ability grouping across kindergarten using an Early Childhood Longitudinal Study. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 339-346.
33. Meier, K. J., Stewart, J. J., & England, R. E. (1989). Race, class, and education: The politics of second generation discrimination. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
34. Mickelson, R. A. (2001). Subverting Swann: First-and second-generation segregation in Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 215-252.
35. National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). User's manual for the ECLS-K longitudinal kindergarten-first grade public-use data files and electronic codebook. Retrieved from United States Department of Education Web site: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
36. National Education Association. (1990). Academic tracking (Report of the NEA Executive Committee Subcommittee on Academic Tracking). Washington, DC: Author.
37. Nye, B., Hedges, L., & Konstantopoulos, S. (2000). The effects of small classes on academic achievement The results of the Tennessee class size experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 123-151.
38. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
39. Oakes, J. (1990). Opportunities, achievement and choice: Women and minority students in science and mathematics. Review of Research in Education, 16, 153-162.
40. Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R. N. (1992). Curriculum differentiation: Opportunities, outcomes, and meanings. In P. W.Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 570-608). New York: Macmillan.
41. Oakes, J., & Guiton, G. (1995). Matchmaking: The dynamics of high school tracking decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 3-33.
42. Orfield, G., Frankenberg, E., & Garces, L. M. (2008). Statement of American social scientists of research on school desegregation to the U.S. Supreme Court in Parents v. Seattle School District and Meredith v. Jefferson County. Urban Review, 40, 96-136.
43. Orfield, G., & Lee, C. (2006). Racial transformation and the changing nature of segregation. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
44. Page, R. N. (1991). Lower track classrooms: A curricular and cultural perspective. New York: Teachers College Press.
45. Reback, R. (2007). Teaching to the Rating: school accountability and the distribution of student achievement (Working Paper No. 0602). Department of Economics, Barnard College, New York, NY.
46. Reuman, D. A. (1989). How social comparison mediates the relation between ability grouping practices and students' achievement expectancies in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 178-198.
47. Rosenbaum, J. E. (1976). Making inequality: The hidden curriculum of high school teaching. New York: Wiley.
48. Slavin, R. E. (1987a). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57, 293-336.
49. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 471-499.
50. Steelman, L. C., Koch, P. R., Catsambis, S., & Mulkey, L. (2007, April). Toward a taxonomy of achievement groups for young children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
51. Tach, L. M., & Farkas, G. (2006). Learning-related behaviors, cognitive skills, and ability grouping when schooling begins. Social Science Research, 35, 1048-1079.
52. Wells, A. S., & Serna, I. (1996). The politics of culture: Understanding local political resistance to detracking in racially mixed schools. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 93-118.
53. Welner, K. G., & Oakes, J. (1996). (Li)ability grouping: The new susceptibility of school tracking systems to legal challenges. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 451-470.
54. Yonezawa, S., Wells, A. S., & Serna, I. (2002). Choosing tracking: "Freedom of choice" in detracking schools. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 37-67.