Subverting Swann: First- and second-generation segregation in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

American Educational Research Journal

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 215-252

  Mickelson, Roslyn Arlin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035596099     PISSN: 00028312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/00028312038002215     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Armor, D. (1995). Forced justice: School desegregation and the law. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Armor, D. (1998). Capacchione et al. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. Expert report to the court.
3. Bankston, C., & Caldas, C. (1996). Majority African American schools and social injustice: The influence of de facto segregation on academic achievement. Social Forces, 75, 535-552.
4. Belk et al. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, 99-239 (1999).
5. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Karabel & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 487-511). New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. (1977). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. Beverly Hills: Sage.
7. Braddock, J., II, & Dawkins, M. (1993). Ability grouping, aspirations, and attainments. Journal of Negro Education, 62, 324-336.
8. Braddock, J., II, & McPartland, J. M. (1988). The social and academic consequences of school desegregation. Equity and Choice, February, 50-73.
9. Brown v. Board of Education I, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
10. Brown, S. (1999, August). High school racial composition: Balancing excellence and equity. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Sociological Association. Chicago.
11. Capacchione et al. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, Civil Action No. 3:97 CV 482 (1997).
12. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools a. (1970-1999). Monthly Reports. Charlotte, NC: Author.
13. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. (1996). 1996-1997 High School Course Offerings. Charlotte, NC: Author.
14. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools b. (1996-1999). Class Counts. Charlotte, NC: Author.
15. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. (2000, September 21). Advanced placement courses taught in high schools, 1997-2001. Instructional Accountability. Charlotte, NC: Author.
16. Cicourel, A., & Kitsuse, J. (1963). The educational decision makers. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
17. Coleman, J., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfeld, F., & York, R. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18. Cook, T. (1984). School desegregation and black achievement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
19. Crain, R., & Mahard, R. E. (1978). Desegregation and black achievement: A review of the research. Law and Contemporary Problems, 43, 17-58.
20. Crain, R., & Mahard, R. E. (1983). The effects of research methodology on desegregation achievement studies: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 839-854.
21. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 1-50. Available: http://epaa.edu/epaa/v8 n1.
22. DiMaggio, P., & Mohr, J. (1985). Cultural capital, educational attainment, and marital selection. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 1231-1261.
23. Douglas, D.M. (1995). Reading, writing, and race. The desegregation of the Charlotte schools. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
24. Farkas, G. (1996). Human capital or cultural capital: Ethnicity and poverty groups in an urban school district. New York: Aldine.
25. Ferguson, R. (1998). Can schools narrow the black-white test score gap? In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The black-white test score gap (pp. 318-374). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
26. Finley, M. (1984). Teachers and tracking in a comprehensive high school. Sociology of Education, 57, 233-243.
27. Gaillard, F. (1988). The dream long deferred. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
28. Gamoran, A. (1990). Instructional organizational practices that affect equity. In H. P. Baptiste, Jr., H. Waxman, J. Walker de Felix, & J. E. Anderson (Eds), Leadership, equity, and school effectiveness. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Gamoran, A., & Mare, R. (1989). Secondary school tracking and educational equity: Compensation, reinforcement, or neutrality. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 1146-1183.
30. Gardner, D. (1998). Capacchione et al. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. Expert report to the court.
31. Green v. New Kent County, 430 U.S. 391 (1968).
32. Gurin, P. (1999). Gratz et al. v. Bollinger, et al.; Gutter, et al. v. Bollinger, et al. Expert report to the court.
33. Hallinan, M. T. (1992). The organization of students for instruction in the middle school. Sociology of Education, 65, 114-127.
34. Hallinan, M. T. (1998). Diversity effects on student outcomes: Social science evidence. Ohio State Law Journal, 59, 733-754.
35. Herrnstein, R., & Murray, C. (1994). The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press.
36. Hobson v. Hansen, 269 F. Supp. 401, DC Cir. (1967).
37. Hochschild, J. L. (1984). The new American dilemma: Liberal democracy and school desegregation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
38. Hochschild, J. L. (1997). Is school desegregation a viable policy option? PS: Political Science and Politics, 30, 458-465.
39. Ingersoll, R. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28, 26-37.
40. Jones, J. D., Vanfossen, B. E., & Ensminger, M. E. (1995). Individual and organizational predictors of high school track placement. Sociology of Education, 68, 287-299.
41. Keyes v. School District No.1, Denver, 413 U.S. 189 (1973).
42. Kluger, R. (1977). Simple justice. New York: Random House.
43. Kornhaber, M. L. (1997). Seeking strengths: Equitable identification for gifted education and the theory of multiple intelligences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
44. Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
45. Kulik, C., & Kulik, J. (1982). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 415-428.
46. Lamont, M., & Lareau, A. (1988). Cultural capital: Allusion, gaps, and glissandos in recent theoretical developments. Sociological Theory, 6, 153-68.
47. Lord, J. D. (1999). Changes in racial housing patterns in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, 1960-1997: Implications for school desegregation. Capacchione et al. v . Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. Expert report to the court.
48. Loveless, T. (1999). The tracking wars. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
49. Lucas, S. R. (1999). Tracking inequality. New York: Teachers College Press.
50. Mehan, H., Villanueva, I., Hubbard, L., & Lints, A. (1996). Constructing school success: The consequences of untracking low achieving students. New York: Cambridge University Press.
51. Meier, K. J., Stewart, J. J., & England, R. E. (1989). Race, class, and education: The politics of second generation discrimination. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
52. Mickelson, R. A. (1989). Why does Jane read and write so well? The anomaly of women's achievement. Sociology of Education, 62, 43-67.
53. Mickelson, R. A. (1990) The attitude-achievement paradox among black adolescents. Sociology of Education, 63 (1), 44-61.
54. Mickelson, R. A. (1998). Capacchione et al. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. Expert report to the court.
55. Mickelson, R. A., & Ray, C. A. (1994). Fear of falling from grace: The middle class, downward mobility, and school desegregation. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 10, 207-238.
56. Mickelson, R. A., & Smith, S. S. (1999, November). Race, tracking, and achievement among African-Americans in a desegregated school system: Evidence from the Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools. Paper presented at the Stanford University Conference on Race: African Americans: Research and Policy Perspectives at the Turn of the Century, Stanford, CA.
57. Mickelson, R. A., & Yon, M. G. (2000). From church basement to mainstream classroom: The evolution of a child's place in Charlotte, North Carolina. In R.A. Mickelson (Ed.), Children on the streets of the Americas. Globalization, homelessness, and education in the United States, Brazil, and Cuba (pp. 160-171). New York: Routledge.
58. Missouri v. Jenkins, 515 U.S. 1135 (1995).
59. Nakao, K., & Treas, J. (1995). Updating prestige and socioeconomic scores. Sociological Methodology, 77, 3-72.
60. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. (1991, June 21). School desegregation: A social science statement. In amicus curiae brief of the NAACP et al., Freeman v. Pitts, U.S. Supreme Court on writ of certiorari to U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
61. Natriello, G., McDill, E., & Pallas, A. (1990). Schooling disadvantaged children. Racing against catastrophe. New York: Teachers College Press.
62. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.
63. Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica: RAND.
64. Oakes, J. (1993). Ability grouping, tracking and within-school segregation in the San Jose Unified School District. Diaz v. San Jose Unified School District. Expert report to the court.
65. Oakes, J. (1994a). More than misapplied technology: A normative and political response to Hallinan on tracking. Sociology of Education, 67, 84-88.
66. Oakes, J. (1994b). Ability grouping, tracking and within-school segregation in the New Castle County Schools. Coalition to Save our Children v. State Board of Education et al. Report to the court.
67. Oakes, J., Muir, K., & Joseph, R. (2000, May). Coursetaking and achievement in math and science: Inequalities that endure and change. Paper presented at the NISE conference, Detroit, MI.
68. Orfield, G., & Eaton, S. E. (1996). Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown v. Board of Education. New York: New Press.
69. People Who Care v. Rockford Board of Education School District No. 205, 851 F. Supp. 905 N.D. Ill. (1994).
70. Peterkin, R. (1998). Capacchione et al. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. Expert report to the court.
71. Phillips, M. (1998). Does the black-white test score gap widen after children enter school? In C. Jencks, & M. Phillips (Eds.), The black-white test score gap (pp. 229-273). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
72. Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Everitt, B. (1999). A handbook of statistical analysis using STATA. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
73. Rhiel, C., Pallas, A., & Natriello, G. (1999). Rites and wrongs. Institutional explanations for the student course-scheduling process in urban high schools. American Journal of Education, 107, 116-154.
74. Rosenbaum, J. (1980). Track misperceptions and frustrated college plans: An analysis of the effects of tracks and tracking on perceptions in the National Longitudinal Survey. Sociology of Education, 53, 74-88.
75. Rossell, C. (1992). The carrot and the stick. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
76. Schiff, J., Firestone, W., & Young, J. (1999, April). Organizational context for student achievement: The case of student racial composition. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
77. Shujaa, M. J. (1996). Beyond desegregation: The politics of quality in African American schooling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
78. Slavin, R. (1990). Achievement effects of ability groups in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Education Research, 60, 471-499.
79. Smith, C. (1999, June 15). Study: Segregated schools returning. Witness: We don't teach black children. The Charlotte-Observer, p. 7c.
80. Smith, S. S. (1998). Capacchione et al. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. Expert report to the court.
81. Sorensen, A. B., & Hallinan, M. (1986). Effects of ability grouping on growth in academic achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 529-542.
82. Spade, J., Columbia, L., & Vanfossen, B. E. (1997). Tracking in mathematics and science: Courses and course selection procedures. Sociology of Education, 70, 108-127.
83. St. John, N. (1975). School desegregation: Outcomes for children. New York: Wiley.
84. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, 402 U.S. 1, 15 (1971).
85. Terman, L. (1923). Intelligence tests and school reorganization. New York: World Book Company.
86. Trent, W. (1998). Capacchione et al. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. Expert report to the court.
87. Tyack, D. (1974). One best system. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
88. Useem, E. (1992). Middle schools and math groups: Parents' involvement in children's placement. Sociology of Education, 65, 263-279.
89. Wells, A. S., & Crain, R. L. (1994). Perpetuation theory and the long-term effects of school desegregation. Review of Education Research, 64, 531-556.
90. Wells, A. S., & Crain, R. L. (1996). Crossing the color line. New Haven: Yale University Press.
91. Welner, K. G. (2001). Legal rights, local wrongs. Albany: SUNY Press.
92. Welner, K. G., & Oakes, J. (1996) (Li)Ability grouping: The new susceptibility of school tracking systems to legal challenges. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 451-470.
93. Wheelock, A. (1992). Crossing the tracks: How "untracking" can save America's schools. New York: New Press.
94. Yonazawa, S. (1997). Making decisions about students' lives: An interactive study of secondary school students' academic program selection. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.