Baselines for assessment of choice programs

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 11, Issue , 2003, Pages

  Hill, Paul T ^a,b,c,d,e,f   Guin, Kacey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b Ctr on Reinventing Public Education   (United States)

^c BROOKINGS INSTITUTION   (United States)

^d RAND's Washington Office   (United States)

^e RAND   (United States)

^f Natl Inst Educ's Compensatory E   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042555466     PISSN: 10682341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14507/epaa.v11n39.2003     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Bernholc, A., Baenen, N., & Howell, R. (2000). Measuring up: 1998-99 Advanced Placement Exam results. Wake County Public Schools. Evaluation and Research Department.
2. Betts, J. R., Rueben, K. S., & Danenberg, A. (2000). Equal resources, equal outcomes? The distribution of school resources and student achievement in California. Public Policy Institute of California.
3. Bryk, A. S., Lee, V. & Holland, P. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Bulman, R.C. & Kirp, D.L. (1999). The shifting politics of school choice. In F. Kemmerer & S. Sugarman (Eds.), School choice and social controversy. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
5. Center for Education Reform (2001). Charter School Laws Across the States. http://edreform.com/charter_schools/laws/
6. Cobb, C.D. & Glass, G.V. (1999). Ethnic segregation in Arizona charter schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives. 7(1). Retrieved October 1, 2003 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n1/
7. Coleman, J.S. & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private high schools. New York, NY: Basic Books.
8. Coleman, J., Hoffer, T. & Kilgore, S. (1982). High school achievement: Public, Catholic, and private schools compared. New York, NY: Basic Books.
9. Education Watch Online. New State and National Achievement Gap Report. The Education Trust. www.edtrust.org
10. Elmore, R. F. & Fuller, B. (1996). Empirical Research on Education Choice: What are the Implication fro Policy-Makers? In B. Fuller, R.F. Elmore, & G. Orfield, (Eds.) Who chooses who loses?: Culture, institutions and the unequal effects of school choice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
11. Ford, D. Y. (1998). The underrepresentation of minority students in gifted education: Problems and promises in recruitment and retention. The Journal of Special Education, 32(1), 4-14.
12. Fuller, B. (1996). School Choice: Who Gains, Who Loses? Issues in Science and Technology. 12(3), 61-67
13. Fuller, B. (1996). Is School Choice Working? Educational Leadership, 54(2), 37-40.
14. Goodnough, A. (2001, May 13). How to get your child the right teacher next fall, New York Times Magazine.
15. Gorard, S., Fitz, J. & Taylor, C. (2001). School choice impacts: What do we know? Educational Researcher. 30(7), 22.
16. Hassel, B. (1999). The charter school challenge: Avoiding the pitfalls, fulfilling the promise. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
17. Haycock, K. (2000). Achievement in America 2000, Washington, D.C.: The Education Trust.
18. Henig, J.R. (1994). Rethinking school choice: Limits of the market metaphor. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
19. Hill, P.T. (1999). The supply side of choice. In F. Kemmerer & S. Sugarman (Eds.), School choice and social controversy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
20. Hill, P.T, Foster, G, and Gendler, T. (1990) High schools with character. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
21. Hill, P.T. & Lake, R.J., (2002) Charter schools and accountability in public education, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
22. Hoxby, C. ( 2000 ) Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers? American Economic Review, 90(5), 1209-1238.
23. Kimbrough, J. & Hill, P.T. (1981). The aggregate effects of federal education programs, Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
24. Kohn, A. (1998) Only for my kid: How privileged parents undermine school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(8), 569-577.
25. Kurlaender, M. & Yun, J.T. (2000). Is diversity a compelling educational interest? Evidence from metropolitan Louisville, Cambridge MA, The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
26. Ladner, M. & Hammons, C. (2001). Special but unequal: Race and special education. In C.E. Finn, A.J. Rotherham, & C.R. Hokanson (Eds.) Rethinking Special Education for a New Century. Fordham Foundation.
27. Loveless, T., (1999) The tracking wars: State reform meets school policy, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
28. Mickelson, R. A. (2001). Subverting Swann: First- and second-generation segregation in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools. American Education Research Journal, 38(2), 215-252.
29. National Governors' Association (1993). Strategic investment: Tough choices for America's future. Washington, D.C.
30. Newmann, F.M., Smith, B.A., Allensworth, E. & Bryk, A.S. (2000). School instructional program coherenc: Benefits and challenges. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
31. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.
32. Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
33. Oakes, J. (1995). Two cities' tracking and within-school segregation. Teachers College Record, 96(4), 681-690.
34. Oakes, J. & Guiton, G. (1995). Matchmaking: The dynamics of high school tracking decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 3-33.
35. Orfield, G. (2001). Schools more separate: Consequences of a decade of resegregation, Cambridge, MA, The Civil Rights project, Harvard University.
36. Orfield, G. & Yun, J.T. (1999). Resegregation in American schools. Cambridge, MA, The Civil Rights project, Harvard University.
37. Oswald, D. P., Coutinho, M. J., Best, A. M., & Singh, N. N. (1999). Ethnic representation in special education: The influence of school-related economic and demographic variables. The Journal of Special Education, 32(4), 194-206.
38. Parrish, T. (DRAFT). Disparities in the identification, funding, and provision of special education. Submitted to The Civil Rights Project for The Conference on Minority Issues in Special Education in Public Schools. http://www.law.harvard.edu/civilrights/conferences/SpecEd/parrishpaper2.html
39. Peterson, P.E., Greene, J., & Noyes, C. (1996). School choice in Milwaukee. Public Interest, 125, 38-56.
40. Rose, H. & Betts, J. (2001). San Francisco, Math matters: The links between high school curriculum, college graduation, and earnings. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California
41. Roza, Marguerite and Paul T. Hill (forthcoming 2004) How Within-District Spending Inequalities Help Some Schools to Fail, in Ravitch, Diane (ed.) Brookings Papers on Education Policy 2004, Washington, Brookings Press
42. Schneider, M., Marschall, M., Teske, P., & Roch, C. (1998). School Choice and Culture Wars in the Classroom: What Different Parents Seek form Education. Social Science Quarterly, 79(3), 489-501.
43. Smith, K. B. & Meier, K. J. (1995). School choice: Panacea or Pandora's box? Phi Delta Kappan, 77(4), 312-316.
44. Smith, S.S. & Mickelson, R.A. (2000). All that glitters is not gold: School reform in Charlotte-Mecklenburg, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(3).101-128.
45. Texas Education Agency, Office of Policy Planning and Research (2000). Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate examination results in Texas, 1998-99.
46. The Achievement Council, Inc. Los Angeles, CA. Unpublished. 1991. As cited in Achievement in America 2000, The Education Trust, Inc.http://204.176. 179.36/dc/edtrust/edstart.cfm
47. U.S. Department of Education (1996). Urban Schools: The Challenge of Locational Poverty. National Education Longitudinal Study (NELS) of 1988. National Center for Education Statistics.
48. U.S. Department of Education (2000). The State of Charter Schools 2000, Washington, D.C.
49. U. S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. (2000). Twenty-second annual report to congress on the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. http://www.ed.gov/offices/OSERS/OSEP/OSEP2000AnlRpt/
50. Valdes, L.A., Williamson, C.L., & Wagner, M.M. (1990). The national longitudinal study of special education students. Statistical Almanac, Vol. 3: Youth categorized as emotionally disturbed. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. As cited in Osher, D., Woodruff, D., & Sims, A. (DRAFT). Exploring relationships between inappropriate and ineffective special education services for African American children and youth and the overrerpresentation in the juvenile justice system. www.law.harvard.edu/civilrights/conferences/SpecEd/ osherpaper2.html
51. Valdes, L.A., Williamson, C.L., & Wagner, M.M. (1990). The national longitudinal study of special education students. Statistical Almanac, Vol. 3: Youth categorized as emotionally disturbed. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. As cited in Osher, D., Woodruff, D., & Sims, A. (DRAFT). Exploring relationships between inappropriate and ineffective special education services for African American children and youth and the overrerpresentation in the juvenile justice system. www.law.harvard.edu/civilrights/conferences/SpecEd/ osherpaper2.html
52. Weiner, S.S. & Kellan, K. (1974). The politics and administration of the voucher demonstration in Alum Rock: The first years, 1972-1973. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
53. Wells, A. S. (1998). Charter school reform in California: Does it meet expectations? Phi Delta Kappan, 80(4), 305-312.