Postscript: Comment on wixted (2007)

Psychological Review

Volumn 114, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 201-202

  Parks, Colleen M ^a   Yonelinas, Andrew P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846307781     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.201     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Fortin, N. J., Wright, S. P., & Eichenbaum, H. (2004, September 9). Recollection-like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus. Nature, 431, 188-191.
2. Gonsalves, B. D., Kahn, I., Curran, T., Norman, K. A., & Wagner, A. D. (2005). Memory strength and repetition suppression: Multimodal imaging of medial temporal cortical contributions to recognition. Neuron, 47, 751-761.
3. Heathcote, A. (2003). Item recognition memory and the receiver operating characteristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1210-1230.
4. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
5. Montaldi, D., Spencer, T. J., Roberts, N., & Mayes, A. R. (2006). The neural system that mediates familiarity memory. Hippocampus, 16, 504-520.
6. Slotnick, S. D., & Dodson, C. S. (2005). Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory. Memory & Cognition, 33, 151-170.
7. Smith, D. G., & Duncan, M. J. J. (2004). Testing theories of recognition memory by predicting performance across paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 615-625.
8. Wixted, T. T. (2007a). Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 114, 152-176.
9. Wixted, J. T. (2007b). Spotlighting the probative findings: Reply to Parks and Yonelinas (2007). Psychological Review, 114, 203-209.
10. Woodruff, C. C. Hayama, H. R., & Rugg, M. D. (in press). Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity. Brain Research.
11. Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 25, 747-763.
12. Yonelinas, A. P. (1999a). The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: A formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1415-1434.
13. Yonelinas, A. P. (1999b). Recognition memory ROCs and the dual-process signal-detection model: Comment on Glanzer. Kim. Hilford, and Adams (1999). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 514-521.
14. Yonelinas, A. P., Kroll, N. E., Dobbins, I. G., & Soltani, M. (1999). Recognition memory for faces: When familiarity supports associative recognition judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 654-661.
15. Yonelinas, A. P. Otten, L. J., Shaw, K. N., & Rugg, M. D. (2005). Separating the brain regions involved in recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 3002-3008.