Visual search at isoluminance: Evidence for enhanced color weighting in standard sub-set and preview-based visual search

Vision Research

Volumn 50, Issue 14, 2010, Pages 1414-1425

  Braithwaite, Jason J ^a   Watson, Derrick G ^a   Andrews, Lucy ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; Color grouping; Inhibitory processes in selection; Visual Search; Visual selective attention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLOR DISCRIMINATION; COLOR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTRACTIBILITY; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUMINANCE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIGHT; MALE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954757307     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.01.013     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bacon W.F., Egeth H.E. Goal-directed guidance of attention: Evidence from conjunctive visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 23(4):948-961.
2. Braithwaite J.J., Hulleman J., Andrews L., Humphreys G.W. Measuring the spread of spreading suppression: A time-course analysis of spreading suppression and its impact on attentional selection. Vision Research 2010, 50(3):346-356.
3. Braithwaite J.J., Humphreys G.W. Filtering items of mass distraction: Top-down biases against distractors are necessary for the feature-based carry-over to occur. Vision Research 2007, 47:1570-1583.
4. Braithwaite J.J., Humphreys G.W. Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: Evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search. Perception & Psychophysics 2003, 65(2):213-237.
5. Braithwaite J.J., Humphreys G.W., Hodsoll J. Effects of colour on preview search: Anticipatory and inhibitory biases for colour. Spatial Vision 2004, 17(4-5):389-425.
6. Braithwaite J.J., Humphreys G.W., Hodsoll J. Color grouping in space and time: Evidence from negative color-based carry-over effects in preview search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29(4):, 758-778.
7. Braithwaite J.J., Humphreys G.W., Hulleman J., Watson D.G. Fast color grouping and late color inhibition: Evidence for distinct temporal windows for separate processes in preview search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 2007, 33(3):503-517.
8. Braithwaite J.J., Hulleman J., Watson D.G., Humphreys G.W. Is it impossible to inhibit isoluminant items or does it simply take longer? Evidence from preview search. Perception & Psychophysics 2006, 68(2):290-300.
9. Braithwaite J.J., Humphreys G.W., Hulleman J. Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: Evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search. Perception & Psychophysics 2005, 67(1):81-101.
10. Braithwaite J.J., Humphreys G.W., Watson D.G., Hulleman J. Revisiting preview search benefits at isoluminance: New onsets are not necessary for the preview advantage. Perception & Psychophysics 2005, 67(7):1214-1228.
11. Bullier J. Integrated model of visual processing. Brain Research Reviews 2001, 36:96-107.
12. Casagrande V.A. A third parallel pathway to primate area V1. Trends in Neuroscience 1994, 17:305-310.
13. Cave K.R. The feature gate model of visual selection. Psychological Research 1999, 62:182-194.
14. Cave K.R., Wolfe J.M. Modeling the role of parallel in visual search. Cognitive Psychology 1990, 22:225-271.
15. Cheng A., Eysel U.T., Vidyasagar T.R. The role of the magnocellular pathway in serial deployment of visual attention. European Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 20:2188-2192.
16. Dacey D.M. Parallel pathways for spectral coding in primate retina. Annual Review Neuroscience 2000, 23:743-775.
17. Donk M. The preview benefit: Visual marking, feature-based inhibition, temporal segmentation, or onset capture?. Visual Cognition 2006, 14(4-8):736-748.
18. Donk M., Theeuwes J. Prioritizing selection of new elements: Bottom-up versus top-down control. Perception & Psychophysics 2003, 65(8):1231-1242.
19. Donk M., Theeuwes J. Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 93:891-900.
20. Egeth H.E., Virzi R.A., Garbart H. Searching for conjunctively defined targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1984, 10(1):32-39.
21. Duncan J., Humphreys G.W. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review 1989, 96(3):433-458.
22. Hendry S.H.C., Reid R.C. The koniocellular pathway in primate vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2000, 23:127-153.
23. Humphreys G.W., Jung-Stalman B., Olivers C.N.L. An analysis of the time course of visual marking using a probe-dot procedure. Perception & Psychophysics 2004, 66:713-730.
24. Humphreys G.W., Olivers C.N.L., Braithwaite J.J. The time course of preview search with color-defined, not luminance-defined, stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics 2006, 68(8):1351-1358.
25. Jiang Y., Marks L.E., Chun M.M. Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:717-730.
26. Kaptein N.A., Theeuwes J., van der Heijiden A.H.C. Search for a conjunctively defined target can be selectively limited to a color defined subset of elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and Performance 1995, 21:1053-1069.
27. Klein R.M. Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Science 2000, 4:138-147.
28. Li J.C.H., Sampson G.P., Vidyasagar T.R. Interactions between luminance and colour channels in visual search and their relationship to parallel neural channels in vision. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 176:510-518.
29. Livingstone M.S., Hubel D.H. Anatomy and physiology of a color system in the primate visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 1984, 4:309-356.
30. Livingstone M.S., Hubel D.H. Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement and depth. Journal of Neuroscience 1987, 7:3416-3468.
31. Moore C.M., Egeth H. How does feature-based attention affect visual processing?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24(4):1296-1310.
32. Morand S., Thut G., Grave de Peralta R., Clarke S., Khateb A., Landis T., et al. Electrophysiological evidence for fast visual processing through the human koniocellular pathway when stimuli move. Cerebral Cortex 2000, 10:817-825.
33. Olivers C.N.L., Humphreys G.W. Visual marking and singleton capture: Fractionating the unitary nature of visual selection. Cognitive Psychology 2003, 47:1-42.
34. Olivers C.N.L., Humphreys G.W., Heinke D., Cooper A.C.G. Prioritization in visual search: Visual marking is not dependent on mnemonic search. Perception & Psychophysics 2002, 64:540-560.
35. Poisson M.E., Wilkinson F. Distractor ratio and grouping processes in visual search. Perception 1992, 21:21-38.
36. Posner M.I., Cohen Y. Components of visual attention. Attention & Performance 1984, Vol. 10. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
37. Shen J., Reingold E.M. Guidance of eye movements during conjunctive visual search: The distractor-ratio effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2003, 57(2):76-96.
38. Shen J., Reingold E.M., Pomplun M. Distractor ratio influences patterns of eye movements during visual search. Perception 2000, 29:241-250.
39. Snyder J.J., Kingstone A. Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited?. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62(3):452-458.
40. Theeuwes J., Lucassen M.P. An adaptation-induced pop-out in visual search. Vision Research 1993, 33(16):2353-2357.
41. Treisman A., Sato S. Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1990, 16:459-478.
42. Vidyasagar T.R. A neuronal model of attentional spotlight: Parietal guiding the temporal. Brain Research Reviews 1999, 30:66-76.
43. Watson D.G., Humphreys G.W. Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review 1997, 104(1):90-122.
44. Watson D.G., Humphreys G.W., Olivers C.N.L. Visual marking: Using time in visual selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7(4):180-186.
45. Wolfe J.M. Guided search 2.0. A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1994, 1(2):202-238.