Is it impossible to inhibit isoluminant items, or does it simply take longer? Evidence from preview search

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 290-300

  Braithwaite, Jason J ^a   Hulleman, Johan ^a   Watson, Derrick G ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIGHT; MALE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; LIGHT; MALE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33745791581     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193676     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BRAITHWAITE, J. J. (2002). Visual search in space and time: Where attention and inattention collide? Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Birmingham.
2. BRAITHWAITE, J. J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2003). Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: Evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 213-237.
3. BRAITHWAITE, J. J., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & HODSOLL, J. (2003). Color grouping in space and time: Evidence from negative color-based carryover effects in preview search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 758-778.
4. BRAITHWAITE, J. J., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & HODSOLL, J. (2004). Effects of colour on preview search: Anticipatory and inhibitory biases for colour. Spatial Vision, 17, 389-415.
5. BRAITHWAITE, J. J., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & HULLEMAN, J. (2005). Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: Evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 81-101.
6. BRAITHWAITE, J. J., HUMPHREYS, G. W., WATSON, D. G., & HULLEMAN, J. (2005). Revisiting preview search at isoluminance: New onsets are not necessary for the preview advantage. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1214-1228.
7. DONK, M., & THEEUWES, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 891-900.
8. GIBSON, B. S., & JIANG, Y. (2001). Visual marking and the perception of salience in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 59-73.
9. HUMPHREYS, G. W., STALMANN, B. J., & OLIVERS, C. [N. L.] (2004). An analysis of the time course of attention in preview search. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 713-730.
10. HUMPHREYS, G. W., WATSON, D. G., & JOLICŒUR, P. (2002). Fractionating the preview benefit in search: Dual-task decomposition of visual marking by timing and modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 640-660.
11. JIANG, Y., CHUN, M. M., & MARKS, L. E. (2002). Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 717-730.
12. KLEIN, R. M. (1998). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431.
13. KLEIN, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147.
14. LIVINGSTONE, M. S., & HUBEL, D. H. (1987). Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth. Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 3416-3468.
15. OLIVERS, C. N. L., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2002). When visual marking meets the attentional blink: More evidence for top-down, limited capacity inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 22-42.
16. OLIVERS, C. N. L., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2003). Visual marking inhibits singleton capture. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 1-42.
17. OLIVERS, C. N. L., HUMPHREYS, G. W., HEINKE, D., & COOPER, A. C. G. (2002). Prioritization in visual search: Visual marking is not dependent on a mnemonic search. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 540-560.
18. SNYDER, J. J., & KINGSTONE, A. (2000). Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited? Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 452-458.
19. THEEUWES, J., KRAMER, A. F., & ATCHLEY, P. (1998). Visual marking of old objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 130-134.
20. THEEUWES, J., & LUCASSEN, M. P. (1993). An adaptation-induced popout in visual search. Vision Research, 33, 2353-2357.
21. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122.
22. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1998). Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 946-962.
23. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 471-481.
24. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2002). Visual marking and visual change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 379-395.
25. WATSON, D. G., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & OLIVERS, C. N. L. (2003). Visual marking: Using time in visual selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 180-186.
26. YANTIS, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 156-161.
27. YANTIS, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 45-77). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.